Sentences with phrase «accurately measure temperature»

Another way to see the evidence of small change is to accurately measure the temperature.

And not only that, as Oscar Versolato from the Max Planck Institute in Heidelberg, who played an important role in the experiments, explains: «With our methods we can choose and set a rotational temperature between about seven and 60 Kelvin, and are able to accurately measure this temperature in our experiments.»

The development means any laboratory in the world with appropriate skills and equipment could accurately measure temperature.

When it comes to climate change science, researchers typically use atmospheric carbon dioxide levels from the late 19th century as a guideline, because that's when instrumentation was developed to accurately measure temperatures.

Not exact matches

Because it measures temperature within a two percent plus or two degree minus range, we felt confident our reading would accurately reflect a true comparison between electric blankets.

This makes it a great pick for anyone who wants something that can measure almost any temperature accurately.

These include the development of a biochemical sensor that can continuously and accurately measure different substances released by the organ - like system, as well as enhancements that allow the use of multiple physical sensors, which monitor features such as temperature, oxygen levels, and pH values.

By measuring the surface temperature of a Kuiper Belt object, and combining this with optical observations, its surface reflectivity and hence its diameter can be determined accurately.

«Although temperature is a familiar concept to all of us, remarkably it can only be measured accurately at a handful of locations around the globe,» says project leader, Professor Andre Luiten, Director of the University of Adelaide's Institute for Photonics and Advanced Sensing (IPAS), where the experiments were conducted.

So, the U.S. National Weather Service, and every other weather service around the world, wants temperatures to be measured as accurately as possible.

One is to accurately measure your body temperature.

The only way to accurately determine if your pooch has a high body temperature is by measuring it with a thermometer.

The collar will measure heart rate and temperature (how accurately?)

The same holds for changes in temperature (the one degree Fahrenheit Will refers to), which can be measured more accurately than the absolute surface temperature of the Earth.

As Houghton and Hansen have both pointed out, we are looking for a small differential in an ill - defined temperature which is very difficult to measure accurately anywhere and which varies naturally over time, both randomly and systematically.

If so, how much confidence should we have in the ability of these scientific instruments to measure temperature of the ocean that accurately?

They say that accurately measured and studiously recorded temperatures is not a good indicator of temperature trends.

For instance, radiative transfer models (measuring heat balance) are quite well verified, and accurately predict the rise in the temperature (and hence energy) of the atmosphere as the CO2 level increases.

Modern methods are far from being able to accurately measure the planet «s global temperature even today, so measurements made 50 or 100 years ago are even less reliable.

Jul 14, 2014 — Analysis: Solar activity & ocean cycles are the 2 primary drivers of climate, not CO2... The correlation of CO2 alone to global temperature is poor at only 44 %, not... The coefficients of determination are a measure of how accurately the....

... Modern methods are far from being able to accurately measure the planet's overall temperature even today, so measurements made 50 or 100 years ago are even less reliable.»

Pinatubo was particularly good for this, because as Soden et al 2002 showed, the GCMs of the day not only accurately modeled the atmospheric drying after the eruption, but also demonstrated that a positive water vapor feedback was required to explain the MSU - measured lower troposphere temperatures.

It is all arbitrary and I have zero confidence in our ability to accurately measure / estimate Earth's temperature, CO2 concentrations and Anthropogenic contributions to CO2 prior to 1950.

How does any of those quotes equate to: «I have zero confidence in our ability to accurately measure / estimate Earth's temperature,

How does any of those quotes equate to: «I have zero confidence in our ability to accurately measure / estimate Earth's temperature, CO2 concentrations and Anthropogenic contributions to CO2 prior to 1950.»

What I wrote was «I have zero confidence in our ability to accurately measure / estimate Earth's temperature, CO2 concentrations and Anthropogenic contributions to CO2 prior to 1950».

Global temperature can not be measured accurately but it stopped warming in 1998.

Why on earth did we pay so much money for the ARGO floats, the only instrumentation actually designed for the task of measuring global ocean temperature accurately to hundredths of a degree, if we don't use the data?

15 Using an infrared thermometer, I have observed the dawn temperatures within vegetated areas are 10 to 20 °F cooler than surfaces just 20 feet away on paved and gravel country roads, instrumentally confirming that cooler tree ring temperatures are more accurately measuring natural climate change.

Because of the way sensitivity has been defined, per doubling of CO2 concentration, you would have to find a like period of doubling in the past when temperature was also accurately measured, for a comparison.

The up - and - down trend of the measured average global temperature trajectory since it has been reasonably accurately measured worldwide is closely calculated using an emergent structures analysis.

ryland - In response to your second, and quite unrelated question,»»... can ocean temperatures be accurately measured to fractions of a degree or to 100 or so zeta joules?

Combine this with the accuracy of the equipment and the reliability of the observer and we really can manage no more than «around about» for local and regional temperatures» and probably «nowhere near accurate» for global records, quite apart from the consideration that large parts of the globe had not even been explored, let alone accurately measured.

Be aware that the «global temperature» measure is a surface or near - surface measure in the atmosphere, and even if it was possible to measure it very accurately, it is really only a proxy for global warming of little use over periods up to a decade or so.

Spencer's key insight is showing that natural causes with three quantitative measures (PDO, AMO, SOI) can accurately model future temperatures given future measures of those parameters — independently of CO2 concentrations.

In practice, the issue for accurately predicting climate in the long term is going to be some totally impracticable requirement for initial conditions like measuring the temperature in the lower 5 km of atmosphere on a 10 m grid to an accuracy of 0.001 C at every grid point.

Outside of how to accurately measure the earth's atmosphere to detect the supposed anthropogenic global warming signal, there is a mountain of damning evidence relating to the fraudulent tampering of the global temperature record by climate activist government agencies — NASA and NOAA.

We can't calculate some of these fluxes accurately (especially convection), so we run the risk of spouting meaningless gibberish don't base reasoning on the MEASURED temperature of the skin layer (from its infrared emission).

If the worlds most sensitive thermometer is placed in the middle of the field, nothing will measure that temperature more accurately, but it will be horrible at detecting what is happening globally.

Satellites have particular difficulty accurately measuring tropospheric temperatures over land.

By WUWT regular «Just The Facts» I am often amused by claims that we understand Earth's climate system, are able to accurately measure its behavior, eliminate all potential variables except CO2 as the primary driver of Earth's temperature and make predictions of Earth's temperature decades into the future, all with a high degree of confidence.

A simple equation calculates the entire temperature trajectory (since accurately measured) with an accuracy of 88 %.

There are major unresolved issues concerning the ability of a global average surface temperature trend to accurately measure climate system heat changes.

The National Tidal Centre operated by the Australian Bureau of Meteorology maintains an array of 14 Sea - Level Fine Resolution Acoustic Measuring Equipment (SEAFRAME) stations which accurately measure sea level and record meteorological paramaters including temperature.

So, the U.S. National Weather Service, and every other weather service around the world, wants temperatures to be measured as accurately as possible.

The service technician will also calibrate the thermostat to ensure that it measures the outside air temperature as accurately as possible.

Accurately preforms preliminary physical tests such as: measures blood pressure, records weight, temperature, pulse and respiration and other measures as directed by established clinical protocols.