Sentences with phrase «acentric nature of reality»

That's the nature of reality.

God can not possess that attribute unless the fundamental nature of reality itself is such that it permits a consistent distinction between that which is a person, and that which is not.

Einstein, Heisenberg and Dirac proved that the nature of reality is, in many cases, illogical, and non-intuitive, thus the ONLY thing that can be relied upon is EVIDENCE.

What is the main difference between my claim about the subject of my dream and your claim about the nature of reality?

If physics proves right about the nature of reality itself (and the concept the universe is a simulation), you're short - changing yourself by not believing in a loving high intelligence.

In order to be honest with one's self, a person would have to be able to accurately determine the exact nature of reality, which to date I don't think any of us our capable of that task.

I do not doubt any person's experience, but that does not mean that I believe their experience is necessarily a «truth» about the nature of reality.

Both sides in the dispute over the reality of an educational canon argue in just this way, presupposing the truth of their predetermined views concerning the nature of reality and hence of how best to learn about it.

Part of the reason I wrote the book was so in the culture, we could have a conversation about this, a substantive, civil, sober conversation on the meaning of life and the nature of reality.

This not only helps to explain religion's primordial, irrepressible, widespread, and seemingly inextinguishable character in the human experience, it also suggests that the skeptical Enlightenment, secular humanist, and New Atheist visions for a totally secular human world are simply not realistic — they are cutting against a very strong grain in the nature of reality's structure and so will fail to achieve their purpose.

«What is the nature of reality?

I found in him one who did dispute the nature of reality with modernity in rich detail and with powerful analysis.

Finally, the Christian hope in the Kingdom of God or the New Jerusalem is a hope in such a «nothingness,» for it is a hope that contradicts the inherent nature of reality.

It is possible that the unbelievable intertwined and complex nature of reality could only be a result of a divine hand at work.

Using human experience as a model to depict the nature of reality, Whitehead argues that every actuality (i.e., every actual event) has both a present subjective immediacy and a past objectivity.

I believe that in its broadest and most general meaning love is central to all reality and order, and that it is grounded in the very nature of reality.

How much the CES actually cares about «the most profound metaphysical questions concerning human existence and the nature of reality» within any recognisably Catholic perspective is, however, to put it as mildly as possible, perhaps in some doubt.

Does logic reflect the nature of reality, or is it a merely formal structure governing the use of language»?

While most people do not recognize it, they also have a view of the nature of reality which undergirds and shapes these other notions.

This explanation has the virtue that it avoid having to look hard at the nature of reality

In a recent book, Our Mathematical Universe: My Quest for the Ultimate Nature of Reality, Max Tegmark, a physics professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, argues that the idea of equivalence means that the universe is a mathematical structure rather than a reality merely describable by mathematics.

«In RE pupils have the opportunity to engage not only with the most profound metaphysical questions concerning human existence and the nature of reality, but also with the most pressing ethical problems of our day.

This explanation has the virtue that it avoid having to look hard at the nature of reality» No, not before a test, I never mentioned that.

With the philosophy of Rene Descartes (1596 - 1650), the nature of reality was no longer seen as writ large over the universe only to be discovered by the exercise of reason but rather was what the human mind perceived, interpreted, made it to be («Cogito, ergo sum.

And this at once gave assurance of a wholly rational interpretation of its processes and the growing conviction that mechanism and materialism as a final reading of the nature of reality were indisputable.

He explained how it is that each droplet comes into existence and perishes simply because it is the nature of reality to flow.

You're saying that I'm ignoring the nature of reality and insinuating that the nature of reality it's more possible to have a premonition given to me by....

Just as I can't possibly grasp the true nature of the reality of science, I've had to admit that I also can't possibly grasp the true nature of the divine, sacred, God, whatever you want to call it.

Also, attention to the experience of women has brought to light much about the past and present and the nature of reality in general that could have been learned only in this way.

17 Linguistic analysis can not develop as a discipline by ignoring ontology, i.e., a reflection on the nature of reality.

Since there was a «seed» of this cosmic principle of reason in each and every human being, humans, through the exercise of reason, could understand the nature of reality and seek «the good life.»

That would in no way require cessation of meditation or a rejection of profound Buddhist wisdom about the nature of reality.

It could be that no explanation of these questions is possible, that this is just the essential nature of reality.

Charles W. Morris, in Six Theories of Mind, writes: «Whitehead's course of procedure is to give a comprehensive description of human experience and then to take this description as a key to the nature of reality» (quoted in 1:51).

Their level of value depends on how language and actions collaborate with the unfolding nature of reality, that is the unfolding, subsummation, and reconciliation of all things.

It is almost a given that children should be taught the known nature of reality.

Thus, as we shall see in more detail later, James's theory as a whole did make the extension into considerations of the nature of reality as a whole.

This essay attempts to make a contribution to that ongoing dialogue by corroborating some of the central features of Harry Stack Sullivan's interpersonal theory of psychiatry in light of Alfred North Whitehead's philosophical insights about the nature of reality.

A major difference, however, between Bergson's theory and James's notion of the stream of thought as outlined in his Psychology is a matter of stress: whereas James, in the Psychology, was hesitant in extending his conclusions beyond the flow of our experience itself, 1 Bergson was always concerned primarily with what is revealed in our experience about the nature of reality, and in particular the nature of time.

By virtue of his own research Sullivan arrived at the same fundamental vision about the nature of reality that Whitehead professed and molded it quite independently into a viable personality theory, suitable for use in psychotherapy.

Here he contends that just as Chuang - tzu tried to perceive the nature of reality from the perspective of fish or butterfly, so, too, should Christians seek to transcend the boundaries of history, religion and culture to develop deeper contacts with the mysterious ways in which God operates.

Throughout the early portions of Star Maker the cosmic mind is unable to accept the perpetual perishing of civilizations, this waxing and waning nature of reality.

Both offer large scale systematic accounts of the nature of reality in general, largely dismissing the suggestion that the only world we can know is one whose main structure is determined by the human cognitive system and which, therefore, only exists for us.

This is the view of the Trinity as immanent, the way in which God embodies the very nature of reality as relational or communal.

In a time of a global transformation of consciousness, the church needs to engage the world based on its radical roots in God's revelation, but informed by current views of the nature of reality.

The realization of the crucial significance of relations between persons, and of the fundamentally social nature of reality is the necessary, saving corrective of the dominance of our age by the scientific way of thinking, the results of which, as we know, may involve us in universal destruction, and by the technical mastery of things, which threatens man with the no less serious fate of dehumanization.

One intuition is that the nature of reality is such that these needed spontaneous intuitions are possible and do occur.

His defense of the revivals and of emotion in religion rested on a broad argument which included God and the nature of reality itself.

Between 1933 and 1936 Collingwood wrote in the manuscripts «Notes Towards a Metaphysics,» «The Nature of Metaphysical Study,» «Method and Metaphysics,» and «Realism and Idealism,» that metaphysics was an attempt to find out what we can about the general nature of reality.

If the church did not maintain a voice in the contemporary debate about the nature of reality and the purpose of human life, it could not hold or attract the kind of leaders it needed for the future.