Not exact matches
The main focus of coaching and mentoring conversations for school
improvement is to build the competency and capability of teachers, so that they can take steps towards
achieving the school's strategic vision and priorities
in the curriculum, teaching and
learning, and assessment, and can effectively make judgments about
students» progress and outcomes.
The fact that such large
improvements in student learning could be
achieved with these common metrics going
in the «wrong direction» reinforces a common finding
in education research: teacher credentials and turnover are not always good barometers of effectiveness.
This school year, teams from nine public NYC middle, high, and transfer schools are working closely with Eskolta facilitators Alicia Wolcott, Jessica Furer, and Katie Gleason using
improvement science methods featured
in Anthony Bryk's book
Learning to Improve: How America's Schools Can Get Better at Getting Better to help their
students develop habits, skills, and beliefs for confronting challenges and
achieving success
in school and life.
As Michael J. Schmoker notes
in his 2006 analysis of the American educational system, Results Now: How We Can
Achieve Unprecedented
Improvements in Teaching and
Learning, providing teachers with time to meet regularly to carefully examine assessment data, set goals, share and create lessons, develop common formative assessments, and review
student work will ultimately lead to a better end result.
June Rimmer, associate director at CEL, highlights the role of the principal
in closing achievement gaps, describes the work of an equity - centered instructional leader
in the
improvement of instructional practice and explains how we can build the capacity and expertise of principals to equip them to be leaders of schools that ensure equity so that every
student experiences excellence
in their
learning and
achieves at high levels.
While
improvements in student learning of mathematics has often occurred
in pockets of school or district
student populations, implementing and sustaining systems for
improvement is best
achieved as a collective whole through school teams.
The study, which analysed the results of different methods of teaching maths
in three American high schools, found that an approach that involved
students not being divided into ability groups, but being given a shared responsibility for each other's
learning, led to a significant
improvement in the achievements of high and low
achieving students.
A partnership with AIR means that school districts and schools can expect to
achieve a coherent, disciplined approach to teaching and
learning embedded throughout the school's and district's practices,
improvement in school climate and culture, more effective teachers and leaders,
improvement in parent and community engagement, and higher expectations and results for all
students.