Not exact matches
Achieving the 2025 target will require a further
emission reduction of 9 - 11 % beyond our 2020 target compared to the 2005 baseline and a substantial acceleration of the 2005 - 2020 annual pace of
reduction, to 2.3 - 2.8 percent per year, or an approximate doubling;» Substantial global
emission reductions are
needed to keep the global temperature rise below 2 degrees Celsius, and the 2025 target is consistent with a path to deep decarbonization.
«We see no evidence of Kyoto actually leading to
reductions in greenhouse gas
emissions, much less of stimulating the fundamental technological change that will be required to
achieve the 60 - 80 %
reductions in greenhouse gas
emissions that scientists tell us the world will
need to
achieve in order to prevent what the Framework Convention calls «dangerous interference with the atmosphere».»
To
achieve the 70 - percent
reduction target for carbon dioxide
emissions used in the study, additional steps would be
needed — and before 2023.
The International Energy Agency for example, reckons that the magic of energy efficiency can
achieve 49 per cent of the GHG
emission reductions needed by 2030 to avoid catastrophic changes in global temperature.
If we are to
achieve the 80 - 90 percent
reduction in carbon
emissions by mid century that Dr. Hansen and other scientists tell us are necessary, we
need to be cutting
emissions a very doable 2 - 3 percent per year.
In California's relatively clean system, new zero -
emission load balancing technologies are
needed much sooner to
achieve the same percentage
emission reductions.
In both, he asserts that the current legislative proposals, by focusing incentives on deployment of today's wind and solar technology, could actually stifle the vital
need to build the capacity for
achieving deep cuts in carbon dioxide
emissions once the easier
reductions are
achieved.
Taking account of their historic responsibility, as well as the
need to secure climate justice for the world's poorest and most vulnerable communities, developed countries must commit to legally binding and ambitious
emission reduction targets consistent with limiting global average surface warming to well below 1.5 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels and long - term stabilization of atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations at well below below 350 p.p.m., and that to
achieve this the agreement at COP15 U.N.F.C.C.C. should include a goal of peaking global
emissions by 2015 with a sharp decline thereafter towards a global
reduction of 85 percent by 2050,
In a forthcoming paper for the Harvard Law and Policy review, «Fast Clean Cheap,» we argue that a regulation - centered approach would only
achieve 10 — 30 percent
emissions reductions in the U.S. by 2050, whereas we
need 80 percent
emissions reductions in the U.S. and 50 percent
emissions reductions worldwide by then if we are to avoid catastrophic global warming.
«To
achieve the target of an 80 %
reduction in (UK) carbon
emissions by 2050 virtually all our electricity will
need to come from clean sources.»
The Pembina Institute's analysis indicates that the oil and gas sector
needs to make a 42 per cent
reduction from its projected 2020
emission level for Canada to
achieve its 2020 climate goals.
It is clear that the building energy code targets set in Section 201 are not only essential for
achieving the energy consumption and GHG
emissions reductions needed, but that they also are the most cost effective approach for doing so.
The report also finds that Brazil
needs to receive more finance for the actual
emissions reductions that have been
achieved in the past decade, (i.e., results - based payments).
However, Australia can not just rely on business action if we are to
achieve the substantial
emissions reductions needed to avoid dangerous climate change.
The independent Electric Power Research Institute recently concluded the nation will
need another 45 more nuclear power plants - to meet growing electricity demand and
achieve a 45 percent
reduction in greenhouse gas
emissions by 2030.
AXIOM: Current global business - as - usual carbon
emissions reductions are nowhere near what they
need to be to
achieve the 2C climate target.
The bar chart above shows how important it will be to decarbonise the power sector, where the largest share of
emissions reductions compared to business as usual
need to be
achieved.
A clear pathway exists for
achieving the
emission reductions that you and many other environmental activists say are desperately
needed.
However, very large CO2
emission reductions from this sector are hard to
achieve and
need significant investments to upgrade industrial plants and deploy CCS technology.
Every little step is
needed, and ultimately decisions regarding how the United States will
achieve these essential
emission reductions must take into consideration not only the expected future profits from existing polluting infrastructure, but also consumer benefits from new energy efficiency and renewables, health impacts from carbon dioxide's co-pollutants, and humanitarian (and geopolitical) considerations from climate damage in the United States and around the world.
In these articles extraordinary admissions are noted from the states leaders about the complete lack of knowledge, expertise and experience of the state government
needed to
achieve these escalated
emissions goals demonstrating that these leaders are cavalierly plunging ahead with SB 32 politically driven
emissions reduction mandates:
To the extent that a nuclear plant's output is replaced by electricity from natural gas, the resulting
emissions set back national efforts to
achieve needed emissions reductions.
The above illustration, following the assumptions about what equity requires made by the authors of the report about how to determine US
emissions reductions obligations, leads to the conclusion not only does the United States
need to
achieve zero carbon
emissions by 2020, the US must reduce its
emissions by -141 % from 1990 levels by 2025.
Because this global challenge can only be met by a global response, we reiterate our willingness to share with all countries the goal of
achieving at least a 50 %
reduction of global
emissions by 2050, recognizing that this implies that global
emissions need to peak as soon as possible and decline thereafter.
The approach builds upon existing state programs by identifying cost - effective actions to increase clean energy in the electric system and to leverage that clean electricity in the transportation and building sectors to
achieve needed emissions reductions.
Significant
emission reductions can be
achieved by energy ‐ efficiency improvements and fossil fuel switching, but they are not sufficient by themselves to provide the deep cuts
needed.
They all accept the IEA estimate that to
achieve a 50 % cut in global CO2
emissions by 2050 (widely believed to be equivalent to limiting the increase in global temperature to 2 °C), CCS will
need to contribute nearly one - fifth of
emissions reductions, across both power and industrial sectors.
If the «Progressives» want to cut global GHG
emissions they
need to advocate removal of the impediments that are blocking the progress and cost
reductions that could be
achieved with nuclear power.
The paper concluded that «the majority of the
emissions reductions needed to decarbonise the global economy can be
achieved in ways that are nationally net - beneficial to countries, even leaving aside the climate benefits.»
Though scientific consensus must always be open to responsible skepticism given: (a) the strength of the consensus on this topic, (b) the enormity of the harms predicted by the consensus view, (c) an approximately 30 year delay in taking action that has transpired since a serious climate change debate began in the United States in the early 1980s, (d) a delay that has made the problem worse while making it more difficult to
achieve ghg
emissions reductions necessary to prevent dangerous climate change because of the steepness of
reductions now
needed, no politician can ethically justify his or her refusal to support action on climate change based upon a personal opinion that is not supported by strong scientific evidence that has been reviewed by scientific organizations with a wide breadth of interdisciplinary scientific expertise.
Fatih Birol, chief IEA economist, said the [2008] fall was «surprising» and would make it «much less difficult» to
achieve the
emissions reductions scientists say are
needed to avoid dangerous global warming.
Along this line there are several issues in particular about which greater awareness is
needed including greater public understanding of the ethical implications of any nation's ghg
emissions reduction commitment in regard to an atmospheric stabilization goal the commitment is seeking to
achieve and the coherence or lack there of the national commitment to an acceptable equity framework.
This latest report was made at the conclusion of these negotiations during which almost no progress was made in defining equity under UNFCCC by the Ad Hoc Working Group on Durban Platform For Enhanced Action (ADP), a mechanism under the UNFCCC that seeks to
achieve a adequate global climate agreement, despite a growing consensus among most observers of the UNFCCC negotiations that nations
need to align their
emissions reductions commitments to levels required of them by equity and justice if the world is going to prevent extremely dangerous climate change.
Although the latter figure was originally proposed by the European Commission, it has been criticized for falling short of the levels that would be
needed to
achieve a minimum target of 80 per cent greenhouse gas
emissions reductions (compared to 1990 levels) put forward in the 2050 Low - Carbon Roadmap.
Achieving the level of
emissions reduction needed to avoid the worst consequences of climate change means we have to start making the right choices about our future energy system now.
In order to
achieve emissions reductions consistent with international climate objectives, we
need to balance these issues, recognising the importance of low - cost energy and the
need to widen the deployment of all low
emission technologies.
If Premier Prentice is committed to
achieving cost - effective, long - term GHG
emission reductions in the electricity sector as part of addressing climate change, wind energy will
need to play a primary and growing role in Alberta's electricity system.
The shift from binding and long term
emissions targets to voluntary Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs) made inevitable the second historic shift in international climate mitigation efforts, which is the formal and explicit recognition that we do not, in fact, have all the technology we
need to
achieve deep
reductions in
emissions.
Cap and trade is preferable to a tax mainly because it would allow us to mandate the
emissions reductions that we
need to
achieve, and then provide sufficient incentive to the market to get that done.
In order to avoid what's internationally considered dangerous levels of global warming, we
need to
achieve tremendous levels of greenhouse gas
emissions reductions.
«Although
emissions reductions are
needed in China, China is unable to shoulder the entire responsibility for
achieving these
reductions without technological and financial support.
While there is some degree of coordination among various agencies and processes, the state
needs to find better ways to coordinate and streamline the collective responsibilities of those agencies to
achieve the state's greenhouse gas
emission reduction, environmental protection, and reliability goals while reducing duplicative or contradictory processes.
We already know that current national climate commitments cover only one - third of the
emissions reductions needed to
achieve that target — and the IPCC report should assess the feasibility of technologies and policy options to get us there.
To
achieve this, the Obama administration
needs first to get its own
emissions reduction legislation through a wary Congress, assuming that the healthcare issue can first be put to bed.
One - third of
emissions reductions needed for 2 degree target could be
achieved with better land management.
However, options now being discussed in Congress can not by themselves
achieve the significant
reductions in the transportation sector
needed to meet the Obama administration's targets for total U.S. greenhouse gas
emissions by 2020.
Today we are faced with the
need to
achieve rapid
reductions in global fossil fuel
emissions and to nearly phase out fossil fuel
emissions by the middle of the century.
«I think [countries]
need to understand that the issue is most urgent and the required rate of
reduction of
emissions is much greater than that which has been
achieved,» said Hansen.
Center for American ProgressWith other smaller changes in global
emissions projections — including a decrease due to the recent economic downturn and reduced
emissions from deforestation and loss of peat lands — the high - end abatement path so far from the Copenhagen Accord commitments leaves us only 5 gigatons short of the 44 gigaton goal by 2020 — two - thirds of the
reductions needed to
achieve climate safety (Figure 3).
To both
achieve emissions reduction goals and fully displace nuclear power, renewable energy would
need to scale up from 17 % of the country's power supply today to a full 57 % of total electricity generation in just nine years» time.