Sentences with phrase «achieve the target allocation»

Target - date funds tend to be more tax efficient, in general, because they often use index funds to achieve their target allocations.

However, the lack of opportunities makes it very challenging for investors to achieve the target allocation for industrial.

Not exact matches

You can use them as part of your long - term approach to lower costs, to reduce tax liabilities, and to achieve a solid and well - targeted asset allocation.

The investor can either choose to do all of the exchanges and purchases at once to achieve the target asset allocation, or purchase the new funds over a period of time, perhaps using a value averaging approach.

While Instant X-Ray is easy to use, there isn't much insight of the result such as what I can achieve if I maintain the allocation and the current contribution level or what will happen if I change the allocation to a different target.

This is because the strategy involves achieving your target asset allocation by selling a portion of the assets that have risen in price and buying more of the assets that have fallen in price.

You can use them as part of your long - term approach to lower costs, to reduce tax liabilities, and to achieve a solid and well - targeted asset allocation.

The target volatility model uses dynamic asset allocation to achieve a stable level of volatility.

The Index seeks to achieve its target sensitivity through the allocation of a weighting to the relevant long - dated Treasury futures contract, as traded on the Chicago Board of Trade, underlying the Index.

Personally, I achieve this by setting target currency allocations in my portfolio, and then try to invest / reinvest accordingly.

For example, I don't invest in a target - date fund, but my portfolio is lower risk than a young person investing in say a Target Retirement 2030 fund, because my allocation to stocks is lower, due to my lower need to take risk to achieve my investment target - date fund, but my portfolio is lower risk than a young person investing in say a Target Retirement 2030 fund, because my allocation to stocks is lower, due to my lower need to take risk to achieve my investment Target Retirement 2030 fund, because my allocation to stocks is lower, due to my lower need to take risk to achieve my investment goals.

The appropriate annual amount to save, rate of return to target, investment allocation to achieve, and more.

In summary, a strong case can be made that the US emissions reduction commitment for 2025 of 26 % to 28 % clearly fails to pass minimum ethical scrutiny when one considers: (a) the 2007 IPCC report on which the US likely relied upon to establish a 80 % reduction target by 2050 also called for 25 % to 40 % reduction by developed countries by 2020, and (b) although reasonable people may disagree with what «equity» means under the UNFCCC, the US commitments can't be reconciled with any reasonable interpretation of what «equity» requires, (c) the United States has expressly acknowledged that its commitments are based upon what can be achieved under existing US law not on what is required of it as a mater of justice, (d) it is clear that more ambitious US commitments have been blocked by arguments that alleged unacceptable costs to the US economy, arguments which have ignored US responsibilities to those most vulnerable to climate change, and (e) it is virtually certain that the US commitments can not be construed to be a fair allocation of the remaining carbon budget that is available for the entire world to limit warming to 2 °C.

This is so because identifying a percentage reduction by a date in the future would not prevent a nation from far exceeding its budget allocation before the target date even if the percent reduction committed to is achieved by the target date.

Although there are are other ethically relevant facts that arguably should be considered in an allocation of ghg emissions such as economic capability to reduce emissions or historical emissions levels, these considerations are more controversial ethically particularly in regard to how they are operationalized in setting a numeric targets and therefore are more amenable to negotiated settlements on issues such as when convergence on equal per capita levels will be achieved rather than in setting basic allocation target levels.

Because it would be impossible to achieve equal per capita emissions allocations in the short - term, C&C allows higher emitting nations to converge on a equal per capita target at some future date thus giving these nations some time to achieve an equal per capita target goal.

Strategies: Determine community needs and establish Service Level Agreements; coordinate efforts to achieve the best outcomes for all Indigenous people; influence funding allocations; target agencies and organisations for specific partnerships; improve the health and well being of individuals and families; enhance services with appropriate cultural content; spread understanding on how to access services.

Strategies: Determine community needs and establish Service Level Agreements; coordinate efforts t achieve the best outcomes for all Indigenous people; influence funding allocations; target agencies and organisations for specific partnerships; improve the health and well being of individuals and families; enhance services with appropriate cultural content; spread understanding on how to access services.