Sentences with phrase «achieved nothing in»

You could argue that having achieved nothing in two years as an MP is not as bad as having achieved nothing in * thirty * - two years as an MP.

No one is bigger than the Club... Except Wenger... He has achieved nothing in 10 + years and last one was a disaster.

Labour's attempt to throw money at the north is pure gerrymandering and will achieve nothing in real terms.

The regulations for the new APPR system are going to achieve nothing in the evaluation of teaching faculty.

Not exact matches

This is nothing new in marketing, but rather than thinking about how your product can help achieve those goals, think about how your company can help further resolution on those issues.

John even referred to his apparel company Fubu's $ 300 million in annual sales as «really nothing,» and said that he's never achieved a comfort level where felt like he and the business were successful.

The very fact that there are many hundreds of thousands of men and women who've started from nothing and become millionaires in business and entrepreneurship means that you can achieve these goals for yourself, if you just learn how.

I fear, at least for the moment, history will judge this meeting as nothing more than a Potemkin summit — filled with countless photos designed to pull at your heart, when in fact, zero was achieved.

History is likely to judge this meeting as nothing more than a Potemkin summit — filled with photos designed to pull at your heart, when in fact, zero was achieved.

Gary believes stopping at nothing to achieve everything is a mindset very few in this world share.

Very simply, the entrepreneurs profiled in this book encompass the number - one ethos dictating entrepreneurial success — being willing to stop at nothing to achieve everything.

Seymour and Pierre are true rock stars in the world of gold mining, and what they've managed to achieve is nothing short of legendary.

This approach is nothing new in the Bitcoin world, though, as companies such as Plutus have been working on achieving the same goal.

Later within the interview, Barhydt hinted that Abra might be prolonged to supply far more than currencies of their app, mentioning his intention to supply people in growing markets with the flexibility to achieve publicity to Apple inventory by the use of nothing greater than a smartphone with some bitcoin on it.

There is nothing wrong with working hard to achieve good results — in fact there is every reason to work hard and give our best to what we do.

Oddly enough I tend to thank only those people that actually helped me achieve what I want in life, not something that did nothing.

The primary logical inconstancy that always bothers me however, is the assumption that without a higher power, meaning can somehow applied to the universe through the individual despite the fact that, according to the materialist atheist worldview, in several billion years humanity will be gone, the universe will have expanded into a cold and lifeless husk, and nothing any human being ever did, learned, discovered, or achieved will have mattered at all, so why care?

We must not be defeatist and cry that the whole Church is heading for disaster, but neither should we have the childish idea of a crazy avant - garde that the Church should move ever faster, that what has been achieved is nothing and that everything that is new in the Church is but a modest beginning leading to unheard - of things.

Today nothing can be achieved any longer by means of the traditional location of the concept of God in the gaps of natural science, by means of the assertion that the concept of God is necessary to explain the world, by means of any transformation of the world by theistic proofs.

He has achieved fame by experiments in which, after removing the amygdalae from the brains of cats, he observed that the cats veered «helplessly from one inappropriate affect to another, boredom where there should be fear... sexual arousal where there was nothing that would stimulate an intact animal.»

«Good» is the movement in the direction of home, «evil» is the aimless whirl of human potentialities without which nothing can be achieved and by which, if they take no direction but remain trapped in themselves, everything goes awry.

Atheism offers nothing to me, it never has and never will, it doesn't make me feel good or comfort me, it's not there for me when I'm sick or ill, it won't intervene in my times of need or protect me from hate, it doesn't care if I fail or succeed, it won't wipe the tears from my eyes, it does nothing when I have no where to run, it won't give me wise words or advice, it has no teaches for me to learn, it can't show me what's bad or nice, it's never inspired or excited anyone, it won't help me fulfill all my goals, it won't tell me to stop when I'm having fun, it's never saved one single soul, it doesn't take credit for everything I achieve, it won't make me get down on bended knee, it doesn't demand that I have to believe, it won't torture me for eternity, it won't teach me to hate or despise others, it won't tell me what's right or wrong, it can't tell nobody not to be lovers, it's told no one they don't belong, it won't make you think life is worth living, it has nothing to offer me, that's true, but the reason Atheism offers me nothing is because I've never asked it to, Atheism offers nothing because it doesn't need to, Religion promises everything because you want it to, You don't need a Religion or to have faith, You just want it because you need to feel safe, I want to feel reality and nothing more, Atheism offers me everything that Religion has stolen before.

Writing in 1941, only a month before her death; she proclaimed: «Christianity and war are incompatible, and... nothing worth having can be achieved by «casting out Satan by Satan.

The Church is never old; nothing she has achieved in the days of her youth will become the boast and marvel of a weak senility.

Some initiatives and experiences have already been undertaken in this field, and they prove that it is possible to achieve this goal even if nothing is ever permanent in this area.

And this bonding and union between water and wine in the Lord's cup is achieved in such a way that nothing can thereafter separate their intermingling.

But in this case the whole populations are rejecting the president and the whole of his political party which he represents whom been lying to the people for 30 years and achieved nothing for their populations but manage to secure their people while populations are starving with no jobs, prices rising currency dropping!?

He concludes his critical investigation in The Historical Jesus: The Life of a Mediterranean Jewish Peasant with the astonishing sentence «If you can not believe in something produced by reconstruction, you may have nothing left to believe in...» [5] Yet no critical reconstruction of any kind can achieve a representation of the original reality of Jesus» career beyond the realm of probability.

It seems to exhaust the theoretical options to say that such an answer must be achieved by reference to either: 1) the categories themselves; 2) the noncategorial aspects of events; 3) both categorial and non categorial aspects of events; 4) some alleged factor (e.g., a God, Platonic Forms, «nothing») other than the categorial aspects of events; or 5) by nothing (i.e., by no alleged factor at all, including «nothing»), so that the ultimate issue is meaningless or at least unanswerable in principle.

We need mindless, self indulgent Narcissists who bend with the wind believing in nothing and achieving nothing.

Indeed, the more I strive, in love and wonder, to measure the huge movements of past Life in the light of paleontology, the more I am convinced that this majestic process, which nothing can arrest, can achieve its consummation only in becoming Christianized.

I don't necessarily believe that the current system is beyond reform, there are some positive movements in this direction, but nothing short of a whole change of perception and thought is necessary; not something that can be achieved with just a little nudge and encouragement.

It is also profoundly relevant to the process insistence that nothing valuable achieved and known in the experience of human beings is ever lost.

Furthermore, that aim either would not be achieved by God (in which case God could not yet be prehended), or it would be, but then there would be nothing to grow.

Expectations have been met entirely Axel Jany, Weyermann ® International Customer Consultant, also had nothing but praise for the event: «We have been attending drink technology India for several years now and have always achieved great results in Mumbai.

When the ball flies over 30 yards, you have enough time to stand in its way instead of jumping helplessly to achieve nothing.

Wrote here in the summer after the market closed that if you sack only Wenger and not the whole leadership it will achieve absolutely nothing.

he was also not slow in Bringing back former manager Mourhino - a man with a proven pedigree and understanding of the modern game — Abramovich takes no prisoners he wants to win — While Chelsea continue to sweep aside all in their path, Abramovich stops at nothing to achieve football success!

Although Villa have nothing to play for, Arsenal on the other hand can still achieve second place in the league, if they win and Newcastle manage to beat Spurs at home.

So, along with Granit Xhaka, this means that Arsenal have achieved necessary reinforcement in all three outfield departments, and so left themselves with nothing to do.

He deserves to come off the bench and potentially inject something different, and he deserves to start when the team is rotated, but based on how he's performed this season and the rhythm the team has achieved in his absence, he's earned nothing more than that.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Wenger manage to please them by spending few money and still making the club have profit.Imagine all those clubs outside the top 4 crying for the CL place as there is so much money involved, that why Wenger is untouchable by the board.He is over achieving compare to what he spend and he does not spend in order to win but to compete.Don t come with your crap talk about Ozil and Sanchez, their buy did not solve nothing of the serious needs of the team, it was Hollywood signing just to woaw around people and supporters.

Supposedly, Brendan Rodgers is already in talks with Pirlo over a lucrative short - term deal and it's believed the move could happen if the Turin - based side win the Champions League this season, as the veteran would have nothing left to achieve with his current side.

He has NO excuses and has been desperately blaming fans now, yet he still get's defended for achieving just about nothing in over a decade.

If Wenger can achieve the incredible double of winning the EPL and Europa it will bring in extra hundreds of millions of Dollars to the Clubs kitty; TV Rights and Revenues; More sponsors;, advertising Contracts — especially in a World Cup year if you are in CL — and so many myriad avenues for raking in the moolah if you are the EPL Champion and Europa Cup winner and are in the CL and a small matter of having high - profile players or hugely talented stars / starlets in your squad — it will attract the big ad - spenders to the Club like nothing else does.

We have been in the champions league for over some time and nothing is achieved I think it's better we start from the Europa league this time....

I suggest sir you achieved nothing and that as early as in the 1st half yesterday you realised you little more than make a fool of yourself with the thick - skinned and callous mind you possess.

Wenger is a deluded idiot who is clueless and still thinks we play teams like 16 years ago, football has changed and we have been sussed the way play where other clubs have moved on AFC has stagnated, Wenger has become too big for his boots and shows he's arrogance towards fans paying the highest prices in Europe for watching mediocre players achieve nothing.

which is certainly not a slight on the young french national player; like him or not, Sanchez has provided some real world - class performances for club and country in recent years... if you do this move, you need to really clean house or face some serious consequences for the foreseeable future... half measures are rarely rewarded, that's how we got here... tear down the wall... we need to get rid of Giroud, not because he isn't a talented player, his skill - set simply doesn't make sense if we hope to maximize the offensive potential of a quick passing, one - touch scheme... we need to evolve, like Barcelona, who realized you needed to have clinical finishers or face a mind - numbing future of horizontal passes and largely ineffective crosses... Barca went and got Suarez, even though they had Messi and Neymar on the roster (just imagine the possibilities — another in the litany of Wenger «what ifs»)... we need to be as clinical in the boardroom as on the pitch... accept nothing less or move on... personally I would move on from Welbeck, Giroud and Walcott, even Ox if he isn't all in... I think the most intriguing player might be Perez, which runs counter to the thoughts in my head when he arrived late last summer... we need a deep lying DM with quick feet and long ball potential, midfielders who can counter quickly even when they are spread out and 4 or 5 players who know how to attack the lanes (kind of a cross between Barca, Dortmund and Monaco)... this is seriously an achievable goal, one that logically should have been achieved quite a few years ago... did no one in the Arsenal organization see the financial restructuring of the football universe... think of the players we could have had but we weren't willing to cough up the dough only for those individuals to have their value double or triple within a 12 to 24 month period... even if just from an investment perspective these «no deals» represent a failure of monumental proportions... only if you cared, of course