In MPS, the teachers and leaders are committed to the vision of high expectations for achievement, equal access to high levels of instruction,
the achievement of academic proficiency for all students, and the closing of the achievement gap among subgroups within the schools.
Not exact matches
Academic achievement, closing
achievement gaps, four - year adjusted cohort graduation rates, «speed to
proficiency»
of English - language learners
For instance, states might assign separate ratings to each
of the five indicator types the law requires:
academic achievement, student growth, graduation rates, progress toward English language
proficiency, and other indicators
of school quality and student success.
They suggested that, rather than measuring
academic achievement based on
proficiency rates alone, states should either look at scale scores or some sort
of an index providing partial credit for getting students to a basic level (and additional credit for getting students to an advanced one).
The new law also requires states to use, as part
of their rating systems, an indicator
of academic achievement «as measured by
proficiency on the annual assessments.»
Scenario 3 essentially projects the results
of realizing the
achievement goals
of NCLB — getting all students to a basic level
of academic proficiency — but by the year 2025.
ESSA requires state accountability systems to include an indicator
of academic achievement «as measured by
proficiency on the annual assessments.»
Each
of the three
academic indicators (
achievement, growth, and progress toward English
proficiency) must carry «substantial» weight.
The promise
of preparing children for
academic achievement and upward mobility depends upon a base level
of language
proficiency.
Since ESSA requires the use
of proficiency rates, one design objective is a combination
of measures on
academic achievement to reduce both the short - term gaming around «bubble kids» (both real and perceived) and also the long - term incentive to lowball cut - scores for various
achievement bands on statewide tests.
The Act (Section 1111 (c)(4)(B)(i)(I)-RRB- requires states to use an indicator
of academic achievement that «measures
proficiency on the statewide assessments in reading / language arts and mathematics.»
Annually measures, for all students and separately for each subgroup
of students, the following indicators:
Academic achievement (which, for high schools, may include a measure of student growth, at the State's discretion); for elementary and middle schools, a measure of student growth, if determined appropriate by the State, or another valid and reliable statewide academic indicator; for high schools, the four - year adjusted cohort graduation rate and, at the State's discretion, the extended - year adjusted cohort graduation rate; progress in achieving English language proficiency for English learners; and at least one valid, reliable, comparable, statewide indicator of school quality or student succ
Academic achievement (which, for high schools, may include a measure
of student growth, at the State's discretion); for elementary and middle schools, a measure
of student growth, if determined appropriate by the State, or another valid and reliable statewide
academic indicator; for high schools, the four - year adjusted cohort graduation rate and, at the State's discretion, the extended - year adjusted cohort graduation rate; progress in achieving English language proficiency for English learners; and at least one valid, reliable, comparable, statewide indicator of school quality or student succ
academic indicator; for high schools, the four - year adjusted cohort graduation rate and, at the State's discretion, the extended - year adjusted cohort graduation rate; progress in achieving English language
proficiency for English learners; and at least one valid, reliable, comparable, statewide indicator
of school quality or student success; and
The purpose
of Title III is to help ensure that students with limited English
proficiency master English and meet the same challenging state
academic achievement standards that all children are expected to meet.
ESSA in § 1111 (c)(4)(B)(i)(I) requires states to use an indicator
of academic achievement that «measures
proficiency on the statewide assessments in reading / language arts and mathematics.»
The bill replaces AYP standards with a requirement for states to annually measure all students and individual subgroups by: (1)
academic achievement as measured by state assessments; (2) for high schools, graduation rates; (3) for schools that are not high schools, a measure
of student growth or another valid and reliable statewide indicator; (4) if applicable, progress in achieving English
proficiency by English learners; and (5) at least one additional valid and reliable statewide indicator that allows for meaningful differentiation in school performance.
The use
of mean scores places the focus on improving the
academic achievement of all students within a school and not just those whose performance is around the state
proficiency cut score (Center for Education Policy, 2011).
Establishes a system
of meaningfully differentiating all public schools on an annual basis that is based on all indicators in the State's accountability system and that, with respect to
achievement, growth or the other
academic indicator for elementary and middle schools, graduation rate, and progress in achieving English language
proficiency, affords: Substantial weight to each such indicator; and, in the aggregate, much greater weight than is afforded to the indicator or indicators
of school quality or student success.
As for participation and
achievement, the addition
of one sport increases the number
of students at or above
academic proficiency by 0.2
of a percentage point.
That's because our friends at the Department
of Education read ESSA's language to mean that
proficiency rates — and
proficiency rates alone — must be the sole measure
of «
academic achievement.»
Principal - evaluation systems must be «based in significant part on evidence
of improved student
academic achievement and growth and student outcomes, including the English language
proficiency of English language learner students, and evidence
of providing strong instructional leadership and support to teachers and other staff.»
Code § 4.26, declares that Pennsylvania's local education agencies (LEA) must provide a program for each student whose dominant language is not English for the purpose
of facilitating the student's
achievement of English
proficiency and the
academic standards.
BART does not discriminate on the basis
of race, color, national origin, creed, sex, ethnicity, sexual orientation, mental or physical disability, ancestry, athletic performance, special needs,
proficiency in the English language or other language, or prior
academic achievement.
It will not be used to discriminate on the basis
of race, color, national origin, creed, sex, ethnicity, sexual orientation, mental or physical disability, age, ancestry, athletic performance, special need,
proficiency in the English language or a foreign language, or prior
academic achievement.
In addition, no person shall be discriminated against in admission to Brooke Charter School or in obtaining the advantages, privileges and access to the courses
of study and extracurricular activities offered by the School on the basis
of race, sex, color, creed, religion, ethnicity, national origin, ancestry, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, mental or physical disability, age, ancestry, athletic performance, socioeconomic status, housing status or homelessness, special need,
proficiency in the English language or a foreign language, or prior
academic achievement, as required by federal and state law, including M.G.L. c. 71, § 89 (l); 603 CMR 1.06 (1); M.G.L. c. 76, § 5 and 603 CMR 26.00: Access to Equal Educational Opportunity.
Under the regulation, schools and districts would receive an overall rating
of one to five stars as determined by school performance (very low to very high) on multiple indicators —
proficiency, a separate
academic indicator for science and social studies, growth (elementary and middle school),
achievement gap closure, transition readiness, graduation rate (high school) and opportunity and access.
The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) requires that each state meaningfully differentiates its schools based at least on the following indicators:
Academic achievement; Another academic indicator (growth and / or graduation rates); English Learner Language proficiency; and An indicator of school quality or student success — The indicator of school quality or student success (SQ / SS), should be Read more about What are states using as School Quality and Student Success Ind
Academic achievement; Another
academic indicator (growth and / or graduation rates); English Learner Language proficiency; and An indicator of school quality or student success — The indicator of school quality or student success (SQ / SS), should be Read more about What are states using as School Quality and Student Success Ind
academic indicator (growth and / or graduation rates); English Learner Language
proficiency; and An indicator
of school quality or student success — The indicator
of school quality or student success (SQ / SS), should be Read more about What are states using as School Quality and Student Success Indicators?
Henry specifically cited the
achievement school district (ASD) model that Tennessee is using, which allows private charter school operators to take over public schools, fire the teachers and principals, and use their own school management approaches to try to bring students»
academic proficiency rates up into the top quartile
of the state's public schools.
The primary purpose
of Title III is to «help ensure that children who are limited English proficient, including immigrant children and youth, attain English
proficiency, develop high levels
of academic attainment in English, and meet the same challenging state
academic content and student
academic achievement standards as all children are expected to meet» (Title III, Part A, Sec. 3102).
According to the U.S. Department
of Education, the purpose
of Title 1 funding, «is to ensure that all children have a fair, equal, and significant opportunity to obtain a high quality education and reach, at minimum,
proficiency on challenging state
academic achievement standards and state
academic assessments.»
The purpose
of Title I is to ensure that every student has access to an equal, fair, and high - quality education that meets, at a minimum,
proficiency on challenging state
academic achievement standards and assessments.
Policy Research Report No. 10:
Academic Achievement of Elementary Students with Limited English
Proficiency in Texas Public Schools.
Courses will examine first and second language development; second language literacy development, assessment, and instruction; successful approaches to assessing and teaching oral language and content skills including designs for differentiating instruction according to students» levels
of language
proficiency; and the multiple factors that influence
academic achievement among this student population.
«The range
of academic, workforce and social
proficiency achievement students should acquire to successfully transition from high school to skilled employment, advanced military training, an associate degree, bachelor's degree, or technical or industry certification, without the need for remediation.
Using publicly available data from the California Department
of Education (CDE), the results show that charter schools are making significant gains in narrowing the
achievement gap, with African American students consistently earning higher
Academic Performance Index (API) scores and
proficiency rates statewide in many urban districts and across subjects.
KIPP: MA does not discriminate on the basis
of race, color, national origin, sex, gender identity, ethnicity, sexual orientation, mental or physical disability, age, ancestry, athletic performance, special need,
proficiency in the English language or in a foreign language, or prior
academic achievement (M.G.L. Chapter 71, Section 89 (m); 603 CMR 1.06 (1).
Research shows young children are wired to learn multiple languages, that the brain is most receptive to language learning in the earliest years
of life, and that the home language is central to developing English
proficiency and overall
academic achievement.
Examples
of a standardized
achievement tests include the California Achievement Test (CAT); Comprehensive Test of Basic Skills (CTBS), which includes the «Terra Nova»; Iowa Test of Basic Skills (ITBS) and Tests of Academic Proficiency (TAP); Metropolitan Achievement Test (MAT); and Stanford Achievement
achievement tests include the California
Achievement Test (CAT); Comprehensive Test of Basic Skills (CTBS), which includes the «Terra Nova»; Iowa Test of Basic Skills (ITBS) and Tests of Academic Proficiency (TAP); Metropolitan Achievement Test (MAT); and Stanford Achievement
Achievement Test (CAT); Comprehensive Test
of Basic Skills (CTBS), which includes the «Terra Nova»; Iowa Test
of Basic Skills (ITBS) and Tests
of Academic Proficiency (TAP); Metropolitan
Achievement Test (MAT); and Stanford Achievement
Achievement Test (MAT); and Stanford
Achievement Achievement Test (SAT.)
A key mechanism for determining the effectiveness
of this
proficiency - based system is the use
of Education Quality Reviews that incorporate quantitative and qualitative data in five dimensions
of school quality:
academic achievement, personalization, safety and school climate, high - quality staffing, and financial efficiencies.
(e) The board shall establish the information needed in an application for the approval
of a charter school; provided that the application shall include, but not be limited to, a description
of: (i) the mission, purpose, innovation and specialized focus
of the proposed charter school; (ii) the innovative methods to be used in the charter school and how they differ from the district or districts from which the charter school is expected to enroll students; (iii) the organization
of the school by ages
of students or grades to be taught, an estimate
of the total enrollment
of the school and the district or districts from which the school will enroll students; (iv) the method for admission to the charter school; (v) the educational program, instructional methodology and services to be offered to students, including research on how the proposed program may improve the
academic performance
of the subgroups listed in the recruitment and retention plan; (vi) the school's capacity to address the particular needs
of limited English - proficient students, if applicable, to learn English and learn content matter, including the employment
of staff that meets the criteria established by the department; (vii) how the school shall involve parents as partners in the education
of their children; (viii) the school governance and bylaws; (ix) a proposed arrangement or contract with an organization that shall manage or operate the school, including any proposed or agreed upon payments to such organization; (x) the financial plan for the operation
of the school; (xi) the provision
of school facilities and pupil transportation; (xii) the number and qualifications
of teachers and administrators to be employed; (xiii) procedures for evaluation and professional development for teachers and administrators; (xiv) a statement
of equal educational opportunity which shall state that charter schools shall be open to all students, on a space available basis, and shall not discriminate on the basis
of race, color, national origin, creed, sex, gender identity, ethnicity, sexual orientation, mental or physical disability, age, ancestry, athletic performance, special need,
proficiency in the English language or
academic achievement; (xv) a student recruitment and retention plan, including deliberate, specific strategies the school will use to ensure the provision
of equal educational opportunity as stated in clause (xiv) and to attract, enroll and retain a student population that, when compared to students in similar grades in schools from which the charter school is expected to enroll students, contains a comparable
academic and demographic profile; and (xvi) plans for disseminating successes and innovations
of the charter school to other non-charter public schools.
(m) Charter schools shall be open to all students, on a space available basis, and shall not discriminate on the basis
of race, color, national origin, creed, sex, gender identity, ethnicity, sexual orientation, mental or physical disability, age, ancestry, athletic performance, special need, or
proficiency in the English language or a foreign language or
academic achievement.
States are supposed to give separate, «substantial weight» to student
achievement, graduation rates, English - language
proficiency and another
academic indicator, as well as an indicator
of school quality or student success.
Non-Discrimination Phoenix does not discriminate on the basis
of race, color, creed, sex, national origin, ethnicity, religion, gender identity, sexual orientation, mental or physical disability, age, ancestry, homelessness, special needs, English language
proficiency or foreign language
proficiency, athletic ability or prior
academic achievement.
For a district qualifying under this paragraph whose charter school tuition payments exceed 9 per cent
of the school district's net school spending, the board shall only approve an application for the establishment
of a commonwealth charter school if an applicant, or a provider with which an applicant proposes to contract, has a record
of operating at least 1 school or similar program that demonstrates
academic success and organizational viability and serves student populations similar to those the proposed school seeks to serve, from the following categories
of students, those: (i) eligible for free lunch; (ii) eligible for reduced price lunch; (iii) that require special education; (iv) limited English - proficient
of similar language
proficiency level as measured by the Massachusetts English Proficiency Assessment examination; (v) sub-proficient, which shall mean students who have scored in the «needs improvement», «warning» or «failing» categories on the mathematics or English language arts exams of the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System for 2 of the past 3 years or as defined by the department using a similar measurement; (vi) who are designated as at risk of dropping out of school based on predictors determined by the department; (vii) who have dropped out of school; or (viii) other at - risk students who should be targeted to eliminate achievement gaps among different groups o
proficiency level as measured by the Massachusetts English
Proficiency Assessment examination; (v) sub-proficient, which shall mean students who have scored in the «needs improvement», «warning» or «failing» categories on the mathematics or English language arts exams of the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System for 2 of the past 3 years or as defined by the department using a similar measurement; (vi) who are designated as at risk of dropping out of school based on predictors determined by the department; (vii) who have dropped out of school; or (viii) other at - risk students who should be targeted to eliminate achievement gaps among different groups o
Proficiency Assessment examination; (v) sub-proficient, which shall mean students who have scored in the «needs improvement», «warning» or «failing» categories on the mathematics or English language arts exams
of the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System for 2
of the past 3 years or as defined by the department using a similar measurement; (vi) who are designated as at risk
of dropping out
of school based on predictors determined by the department; (vii) who have dropped out
of school; or (viii) other at - risk students who should be targeted to eliminate
achievement gaps among different groups
of students.
The authors find that statewide accountability measures fall into one
of seven main categories
of indicators:
achievement indicators, such as
proficiency in reading and mathematics; student growth indicators in multiple
academic subjects; English language acquisition indicators; early warning indicators, such as chronic absenteeism; persistence indicators, such as graduation rates; college - and career - ready indicators, such as participation in and performance on college entry exams; and other indicators, such as access to the arts.
The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) requires states to provide the public with a greater amount
of information about how the
academic achievement of English learners (ELs) and how they are progressing towards English
proficiency, than its predecessor, known as the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB).
M.G.L. c. 71 § 89 (l) states that charter schools shall be open to all students, on a space available basis, and shall not discriminate on the basis
of race, color, national origin, creed, sex, ethnicity, sexual orientation, mental or physical disability, age, ancestry, athletic performance, special need, or
proficiency in the English language or a foreign language, and
academic achievement.
The middle school received the ELPA Excellence Award for achieving the highest English language and
academic growth among English learners and the highest
academic achievement for English learners who transition out
of the English language
proficiency program.
The purpose
of Title I, Part A Improving the
Academic Achievement of the Disadvantaged is to ensure that all children have a fair, equal, and significant opportunity to obtain a high - quality education and reach proficiency on challenging state academic achievement standards and asse
Academic Achievement of the Disadvantaged is to ensure that all children have a fair, equal, and significant opportunity to obtain a high - quality education and reach proficiency on challenging state academic achievement standards and a
Achievement of the Disadvantaged is to ensure that all children have a fair, equal, and significant opportunity to obtain a high - quality education and reach
proficiency on challenging state
academic achievement standards and asse
academic achievement standards and a
achievement standards and assessments.
Academic data has found that these students often have lower academic proficiency rates than their English - only counterparts and this achievement gaps continues to widen over the course of their academic
Academic data has found that these students often have lower
academic proficiency rates than their English - only counterparts and this achievement gaps continues to widen over the course of their academic
academic proficiency rates than their English - only counterparts and this
achievement gaps continues to widen over the course
of their
academic academic careers.
i3 funds are competitive grants (Development, Validation and Scale - up) given to LEAs and nonprofit organizations that have significantly closed the
achievement gaps between economically disadvantaged students, students from major racial and ethnic groups, students with limited English
proficiency, students with disabilities; or have demonstrated success in significantly increasing student
academic achievement for all groups
of students; or have made significant improvements in other areas such as graduate rates or increased recruitment and placement
of high - quality teachers and principals.