This paper considers the issues raised in using standardized
achievement test scores for purposes of examining the academic productivity of schools.
Not exact matches
With our culture and our nation's emphasis on high academic
achievement, the perception that in order to get into college kids need straight As and perfect
test scores, increased course work and more complex curricula, teachers are feeling the pressure to cover more material, and to prepare kids
for the next grade.
The «No Child Left Behind» act, signed by President Bush in January, greatly expands federal oversight of public education, mandating annual
testing of children in grades 3 through 8 and one grade - level in high school, insisting every classroom teacher be fully certified and setting a 12 - year timetable
for closing racial and economic
achievement gaps in
test scores.
The aptitude /
achievement discrepancy method caused many problems
for learning disabled students who did not meet the cutoff
test scores:
If you only praise your child
for getting 100 on a
test, or
for scoring the most goals in the game, your child may think your love is conditional on high
achievement.
However, even after control
for confounding and selection factors associated with infant feeding practices, increasing duration of breastfeeding was associated with small but significant increases in
scores on standardized
tests of ability and
achievement, teacher ratings of classroom performance, and greater success at high school.
Table 1 shows clear and highly significant (P <.0001) tendencies
for increasing duration of breastfeeding to be associated with higher
scores on measures of cognitive ability, teacher ratings of performance, standardized
tests of
achievement, better grades in School Certificate examinations, and lower percentages of children leaving school without qualifications.
On average, children who were breastfed
for ≥ 8 months 1)
scored between 0.35 and 0.59 SD units higher on standardized
tests of ability or
achievement and teacher ratings of school performance than children who were not breastfed, and 2) were considerably less likely than nonbreastfed children to leave school without qualifications (relative risk = 0.38; 95 % CI: 0.25, 0.59).
When compared to control group counterparts in randomized trials, infants and toddlers who participated in high - quality home visiting programs were shown to have more favorable
scores for cognitive development and behavior, higher IQs and language
scores, higher grade point averages and math and reading
achievement test scores at age 9, and higher graduation rates from high school.
By contrast,
achievement scores on the Woodcock Word, Passage, and Reading Comprehension
tests were higher
for breastfed than
for bottle - fed children (Table 4).
The state was prepared to use part of its federal Race to the Top money to pay Wireless Generation to develop software to track student
test scores,
achievement and so on, creating a system similar to the Achievement Reporting and Innovation System, or ARIS, that it developed for the ci
achievement and so on, creating a system similar to the
Achievement Reporting and Innovation System, or ARIS, that it developed for the ci
Achievement Reporting and Innovation System, or ARIS, that it developed
for the city schools.
The Success network is known
for its students» high
achievement on state
tests, and it emphasizes getting — and keeping —
scores up.
«If we're saying that the only thing that's a valid measure of student
achievement is a
test score, versus all the other work they do, it's going to be a sad day
for the students of New York state,» Mulgrew said.
«In addition to gains in
achievement test scores we also saw improvements in engagement with school, such as an increase in attendance of about 2.5 weeks per year» said Jonathan Guryan, Associate Professor of Human Development and Social Policy in the Institute
for Policy Research at Northwestern University and Co-director of the University of Chicago Urban Education Lab.
For instance, in an April 28, 2004, column, Winerip described a school in Florida as unfairly penalized by NCLB, but he failed to mention that the school reported low overall
test scores and had significant
achievement gaps between white and minority students.
For admission, they must
score at an 8th - grade level on standardized reading and math
tests (the Richmond Tech PLC raised that to 9th grade because it had so many applicants), pass an interview, and sign an
achievement contract that also commits them to attend a daily meeting called Morning Motivation.
For instance, data may show that the students who pass through one teacher's class consistently
score lower on state
achievement tests than the students in another teacher's class.
Perhaps it's because white students
score higher on
achievement tests and graduate at substantially higher rates that many of the loudest voices in this debate aren't troubled by asking
for patience and time to get things exactly right before proceeding.
Even if we ignore the fact that most portfolio managers, regulators, and other policy makers rely on the level of
test scores (rather than gains) to gauge quality, math and reading
achievement results are not particularly reliable indicators of whether teachers, schools, and programs are improving later - life outcomes
for students.
Children in smaller groups
score higher in all standard
achievement tests, especially
for reading and maths.
U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan has released broad principles
for renewing the Elementary and Secondary Education Act that seek to address perennial complaints that the law's current version — the No Child Left Behind Act — is inflexible and focuses too narrowly on student
test scores to get a picture of a school's
achievement.
First, we use our entire sample to analyze the extent to which the schools that students attend can explain the overall variation in student
test scores and fluid cognitive skills, controlling
for differences in prior
achievement and student demographic characteristics (including gender, age, race / ethnicity, and whether the student is from a low - income family, is an English language learner, or is enrolled in special education).
Rick Hess and Paul Peterson,
for example, have compared state cut
scores for proficiency on their state
tests to results on the U.S. Department of Education's National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) to show that the level of
achievement required to be declared proficient in many states has been dropping over the last decade.
University of Washington researchers use state
test scores, rates of free and reduced lunch, and the number of AP classes that students enroll in to determine the general level of school
achievement for comparison.
Westinghouse Information Service, a
scoring contractor based in Iowa City, Iowa, blamed «computer error»
for mistakes in the
scores of the Arizona students in grades 1 through 12 who took the California
Achievement Test in April.
In 1999, Michigan increased the reward
for good academic performance by offering the Michigan Merit Award, a one - year $ 2,500 scholarship
for any student who
scores at Level I or Level 2 on the Michigan Educational
Achievement Program (MEAP)
tests in reading, mathematics, science, and writing.
We have known
for decades that teachers were being pushed into using bad
test prep, that states and districts were complicit in this, that
scores were often badly inflated, and even that
score inflation was creating an illusion of narrowing
achievement gaps.
• There was a widespread, well - justified concern that prior accountability measures based primarily on
achievement levels (proficiency rates) unfairly penalized schools serving more disadvantaged students and failed to reward schools
for strong
test score growth.
The matrix converts
scores on standardized
tests — the Stanford
Achievement Test for English - speaking students and the Aprenda exam
for Spanish - speaking students with limited English proficiency —
scores on the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability
Test (NNAT), average course grades, teacher recommendations, and indicators
for socioeconomic status into an overall index
score.
The effect is largest
for students with below - average
test scores, suggesting that later start times would narrow gaps in student
achievement.
The patient responded with strong vital signs
for a time, as
test scores climbed in the 1990s and
achievement gaps narrowed.
However, many education researchers speak and write as though they accept certain contingency - free causal connections —
for example, that small schools are better than large ones; that time on task raises
achievement; that summer school raises
test scores; that school desegregation hardly affects
achievement; and that assigning and grading homework improves
achievement.
The K - 20 EDW includes detailed enrollment, demographic, and program participation information
for each student, as well as reading and math
achievement test scores.
For example, a student who begins the year at the 50th percentile on the state reading and math
test and is assigned to a teacher in the top quartile in terms of overall TES
scores will perform on average, by the end of the school year, three percentile points higher in reading and two points higher in math than a peer who began the year at the same
achievement level but was assigned to a bottom - quartile teacher.
That's a daunting challenge
for any
test maker, but it's further complicated by widespread fears of soaring failure rates and their political consequences, as well as by Arne Duncan's stipulation (in the federal grants that underwrite the assessment - development process) that the states belonging to each consortium must reach consensus on those passing
scores (in government jargon, «common
achievement standards»).
In tackling this task, Feinberg says, they «backed into» the five essential tenets of the KIPP model: High Expectations (
for academic
achievement and conduct); Choice and Commitment (KIPP students, parents, and teachers all sign a learning pledge, promising to devote the time and effort needed to succeed); More Time (extended school day, week, and year); Power to Lead (school leaders have significant autonomy, including control over their budget, personnel, and culture); and Focus on Results (
scores on standardized
tests and other objective measures are coupled with a focus on character development).
To estimate the
achievement of workers born in the United States, we use mathematics
test scores on the NAEP
for 8th graders by birth state between 1990 and 2011.
But
for Core proponents, the timing couldn't be worse: Just as states began implementing the new standards, 40 states receiving No Child waivers are also launching new systems to evaluate teachers, which will incorporate some measures of student
achievement, including, where available,
scores from standardized
tests.
Her litany of complaints about the academic results of Klein's «radical restructuring» is somewhat familiar — «inflating»
test results and «taking shortcuts» to boost graduation — except
for the charge that «the recalibration of the state
scores revealed that the
achievement gap among children of different races in New York City was virtually unchanged between 2002 and 2010, and the proportion of city students meeting state standards dropped dramatically, almost to the same point as in 2002.»
For example, from 1990 to 2007, black students» scale scores increased 34 points on the NAEP 4th - grade mathematics tests (compared with a 28 - point increase for whites), and the black - white achievement gap declined from 32 to 26 points during this peri
For example, from 1990 to 2007, black students» scale
scores increased 34 points on the NAEP 4th - grade mathematics
tests (compared with a 28 - point increase
for whites), and the black - white achievement gap declined from 32 to 26 points during this peri
for whites), and the black - white
achievement gap declined from 32 to 26 points during this period.
For more than three decades, the United States has been
scoring below the international average among participating nations on
tests of math and science
achievement.
These narrow goals will also give
for - profit schools a powerful incentive to admit and encourage those students whom they expect to do well on
achievement tests or who are likely to show the greatest value - added — that is, the greatest improvement in
test scores.
Because of the need
for nationally standardized
achievement tests to provide fine - grained, percentile - by - percentile comparisons, it is imperative that these
tests produce a considerable degree of
score spread — in other words, plenty of differences among
test takers»
scores.
And building
test -
score - based student
achievement into teacher evaluations, while (in my view) legitimate
for some teachers, has led to crazy arrangements
for many teachers whose performance can not be properly linked to reading and math
scores in grades 3 — 8.
A handful of school districts and states — including Dallas, Houston, Denver, New York, and Washington, D.C. — have begun using student
achievement gains as indicated by annual
test scores (adjusted
for prior
achievement and other student characteristics) as a direct measure of individual teacher performance.
«Students who have highly effective teachers three years in a row
score as much as 50 percentile points higher on
achievement tests than those who have ineffective teachers
for three years in a row.»
The Florida Department of Education's Education Data Warehouse provides
test scores from the Florida Comprehensive Achievement Test (FCAT) and demographic characteristics for all students in the public scho
test scores from the Florida Comprehensive
Achievement Test (FCAT) and demographic characteristics for all students in the public scho
Test (FCAT) and demographic characteristics
for all students in the public schools.
As an example of the limitation of this measure, note that the United States is coded as a country where teacher salaries can be adjusted
for outstanding performance in teaching on the grounds that salary adjustments are possible
for achieving the National Board
for Professional Teaching Standards certification or
for increases in student
achievement test scores.
Rather, Duncan's much - touted «loose - tight» proposal entails jettisoning NCLB's overdone remedy cascade
for most schools in return
for a more prescriptive federal role in «turning around» schools that
score in the bottom five percent on
tested achievement.
Baseline
test scores were included to adjust
for the minor baseline differences between the treatment and control groups on the
achievement tests and to increase the precision of the estimated impact.