A number of studies have found that the National Board Certification assessment process identifies teachers who are more effective in raising student
achievement than other teachers.
Not exact matches
Even if we ignore the fact that most portfolio managers, regulators, and
other policy makers rely on the level of test scores (rather
than gains) to gauge quality, math and reading
achievement results are not particularly reliable indicators of whether
teachers, schools, and programs are improving later - life outcomes for students.
Pointing out that student -
achievement gains are more influenced by classroom
teachers than any
other factor, she said the focus...
Research on
teacher quality, charter schools, school leadership, class size, and
other factors in school quality is likely to be as or more important
than research on race - specific policies for reducing gaps in student
achievement.
No study, however, has ever shown that National Board - certified
teachers are any better
than other teachers at raising student
achievement.
But not for all the usual reasons that people raise concerns: the worry about whether we've got good measures of
teacher performance, especially for instructors in subjects
other than reading and math; the likelihood that tying
achievement to evaluations will spur teaching to the test in ways that warp instruction and curriculum; the futility of trying to «principal - proof» our schools by forcing formulaic, one - size - fits - all evaluation models upon all K — 12 campuses; the terrible timing of introducing new evaluation systems at the same time that educators are working to implement the Common Core.
Under the assumption that students in the same year of school are at broadly similar levels of
achievement,
teachers then teach the relevant year - level curriculum, accepting that some students inevitably will learn more of what they teach
than others.
In
other words, we ask whether
teachers who receive higher TES ratings
than other teachers in their school produce larger gains in student
achievement than their same - school colleagues.
This evaluation problem is further complicated by the fact that schools have goals
other than cognitive
achievement (for instance, promoting citizenship, fostering individual development, and reducing drug use and violence) that are difficult to measure and are often achieved only with
teachers» cooperation.
But preliminary new research focusing on Denver's residency program showed that
teachers trained through the program were less effective at improving student
achievement in math
than other novice
teachers in Denver.
It's true that Eisenberg failed to find a correlation between
teachers» GPAs and their students»
achievement, but GPA is considered a fairly crude measure of a
teacher's subject - matter knowledge;
teachers presumably take courses in college
other than those in their subject area, courses that might drag their GPAs down.
«Districts currently pay about $ 8 billion each year to
teachers because they have master's degrees, even though there is little evidence
teachers with master's degrees improve student
achievement more
than other teachers,» Duncan said in a 2010 speech.
Student
achievement remains a far more robust measure of
teacher quality
than many
others available.
Teacher effectiveness has more influence on student
achievement than any
other in - school factor.
Economists Eric Hanushek, John Kain, and Steven Rivkin estimated that, at a minimum, variations in
teacher quality account for 7.5 percent of the total variation in student
achievement — a much larger share
than any
other school characteristic.
Researchers who have studied the Tennessee data, mainly former University of Tennessee professor William Sanders and his colleagues, found that the effectiveness of
teachers has more of an influence on student
achievement than any
other schooling factor.
Other school characteristics associated with better student
achievement included: more time spent on English instruction;
teacher pay plans that were based on
teachers» effectiveness at improving student
achievement, principals» evaluations, or whether
teachers took on additional duties, rather
than traditional pay scales; an emphasis on academics in schools» mission statements; and a classroom policy of punishing or rewarding the smallest of student infractions.
Having
teachers who care, that take time to listen, possess empathy, and demonstrate a positive regard for
others have a greater impact on student
achievement than those who don't (Hattie, Pg.
Scott notes that her study did not examine
teacher perception surveys» uses
other than the EES survey's relationship to student
achievement nor did the research make any claims about whether changes in school goals, processes, and supports result in changes in student outcomes.
Despite ample research indicating that
teachers matter more to student
achievement than any
other in - school factor, 32 both the Trump - DeVos budget and the House appropriations bill proposed eliminating the Supporting Effective Instruction State Grant program, often referred to as Title II grants after the section of the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), a reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, that authorizes the funding.
Models of student
achievement in a given year as a function of prior
achievement and
other controls tend to give higher correlations
than other models, see: Daniel F. McCaffrey, Tim R. Sass, J. R. Lockwood, and Kata Mihaly, «The intertemporal variability of
teacher effect estimates,» Education Finance and Policy, 4, no. 4, (2009): 572 - 606.
Senate Bill 191, which had already passed the Senate, tied evaluations to student
achievement, revamped the tenure - granting process, and based
teacher placement on factors
other than seniority.
U.S.
teachers grade homework far more
than teachers in
other countries, yet at least one study shows a negative correlation between grading homework and student
achievement.
The data also suggest that school leaders who involve their
teachers in student conduct policy decisions has a greater impact on student academic
achievement than many
other measures.
«
Teachers matter more to student
achievement, more
than any
other factor inside our school building,» Melinda Gates said.
Teachers who more effectively demonstrated the types of practices emphasized in any given system had greater student achievement gains than other t
Teachers who more effectively demonstrated the types of practices emphasized in any given system had greater student
achievement gains
than other teachersteachers.
• To identify a direct and thus causational relationship between
teachers and students, all
other factors impacting student
achievement, including out - of - school factors, would have to be controlled, resulting in a process that would cost more money and time
than the state can fund.
Teacher Denise Casco at Vista del Valle Dual Language Academy in San Fernando said the inclusion of student
achievement could disproportionately affect her because she serves a more disadvantaged community
than others in the district.
The author estimates measures of value added for a subset of elementary
teachers and show that charter movers were less effective
than other mobile
teachers and colleagues within their sending schools, by 3 to 4 percent of a student - level standard deviation in
achievement.
The reading classes are grouped by
achievement, not grade level, and are taught by someone
other than the student's regular classroom
teacher, so that more
than one
teacher is intimately familiar with each student.
Membership is open to all who support the health and educational
achievement of our nation's children, and more
than 4 million parents,
teachers, community members, and
other concerned citizens are currently PTA members.
Proponents point to positive benchmarks: District enrollment is growing; D.C. scores on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) have improved (in some cases at a much faster rate
than students in
other large urban districts); and
teachers who left the district after receiving low marks on D.C.'s new
teacher evaluation system were replaced with higher - scoring
teachers who boosted student
achievement.
In Chicago, 100 percent of the
teachers at Maria Saucedo Scholastic Academy voted to boycott the Illinois Standards Achievement Test, backed by the full support of the Chicago Teachers Union, which called it «an obsolete test [that] has no use to educators or administrators... and serves no purpose other than to give students another standardized test
teachers at Maria Saucedo Scholastic Academy voted to boycott the Illinois Standards
Achievement Test, backed by the full support of the Chicago
Teachers Union, which called it «an obsolete test [that] has no use to educators or administrators... and serves no purpose other than to give students another standardized test
Teachers Union, which called it «an obsolete test [that] has no use to educators or administrators... and serves no purpose
other than to give students another standardized test.»
However, the connections manifested at lower levels
than other critical factors influencing
teachers» decisions to remain in a school, including the percentage of
teachers on emergency credentials, student poverty levels, school size, and school designation levels for student
achievement.
His overall findings might be surprising to some; more
than socioeconomic status,
teacher feedback,
teacher - student relationship, and a host of
other factors that one might expect to have a substantial impact on how well students do in school, Hattie found that by far the single strongest influencer of student
achievement is collective
teacher efficacy.
We consider the limited empirical research on the potential for systematic errors in value - added for these
teachers, either because the models do not adequately account for the likely
achievement growth of their students, or because they do not account for
teachers being more or less effective for students with disabilities
than they are for
other students.
These models, which consider student growth on standardized tests, fall roughly into four categories: «value - added models» that do not control for student background; models that do control for student background; models that compare
teachers within rather
than across schools; and student growth percentile (SGP) models, which measure the
achievement of individual students compared to
other students with similar test score histories.
But instead of leaving
teacher effectiveness completely up to local educators, its Encouraging Innovation and Effective
Teachers Act (PDF) surprisingly requires states and districts to develop teacher evaluation systems that use multiple measures of evaluation; incorporate student achievement data; include more than two rating categories; are tied to personnel decisions; and are developed with input from parents, teachers, and othe
Teachers Act (PDF) surprisingly requires states and districts to develop
teacher evaluation systems that use multiple measures of evaluation; incorporate student
achievement data; include more
than two rating categories; are tied to personnel decisions; and are developed with input from parents,
teachers, and othe
teachers, and
other staff.
In fact, the importance of experience may be clearer in the teaching profession
than any
other, as shown in a recent re-analysis of the STAR Tennessee experiment, showing that Kindergarten students had higher
achievement and earnings as adults, depending on how long their
teachers had been in the profession, with gains for every year up to twenty.
However, decisions about how best to use the
achievement growth of students with disabilities for evaluating their
teachers also must consider the accuracy of
other measures of teaching and the costs of relying on these rather
than on value - added.
Along with observations, scores on student learning objectives, and survey responses, [10] they might also include the value that
teachers bring to student outcomes
other than achievement test scores.
Teachers are the most important in - school factor for student achievement.97 Indeed, research estimates that teachers have two to three times the effect of any other school factor, such as school services and leadership, on student academic performance.98 An oft - cited study underscores the scope of this effect, finding that students with three consecutive high - performing teachers scored approximately 50 percentile points higher than students placed with three consecutive low - performing tea
Teachers are the most important in - school factor for student
achievement.97 Indeed, research estimates that
teachers have two to three times the effect of any other school factor, such as school services and leadership, on student academic performance.98 An oft - cited study underscores the scope of this effect, finding that students with three consecutive high - performing teachers scored approximately 50 percentile points higher than students placed with three consecutive low - performing tea
teachers have two to three times the effect of any
other school factor, such as school services and leadership, on student academic performance.98 An oft - cited study underscores the scope of this effect, finding that students with three consecutive high - performing
teachers scored approximately 50 percentile points higher than students placed with three consecutive low - performing tea
teachers scored approximately 50 percentile points higher
than students placed with three consecutive low - performing
teachersteachers.99
Grade 5
teachers are particularly weak, but the data indicates that
Achievement First's
teachers should be evaluated as ineffective and the charter school chain should remove and replace all
teachers other than those teaching in grade 3.
«Some
teachers reliably elicit greater gains [in student
achievement]
than others, because of the differences in how they teach» (Brophy, 1992).
Differences in value - added from high - and low - stakes tests might be due to some
teachers focusing more
than others on superficial aspects of the tests and practices that improve student test scores but not student
achievement.
We then assess the impact of these placements on student
achievement in the classrooms in which student teaching occurs, and find that a
teacher's students perform only slightly worse in math and not significantly better or worse in English Language Arts, all else equal, in years in which the
teacher hosts a student
teacher than in
other years.
About 80 % said that their
teachers are more concerned about
achievement than caring for
others.
Parents United for Responsible Education and the parent group More
Than a Score strongly support the
teachers at Chicago's Saucedo, Drummond, and any
other Chicago Public Schools (CPS) and Illinois
teachers who are refusing to administer the Illinois Standards
Achievement Test to their students beginning on Monday, March 3.
Staff teams have stronger relations with all three
teacher variables
than any of the
other within - school collective leadership sources, and staff teams are the only in - school source of collective leadership related to
achievement (r =.28).
New research has identified
teacher working conditions as having a greater effect on
teacher turnover
than most
other factors, including student
achievement and student characteristics.