A Lincoln paralysis injury lawyer can offer you valuable insight into your legal options and take the first steps towards
achieving justice on your behalf.
The inquisition was a rational and controlled response aimed at
achieving justice on the basis of evidence rather than hearsay.
Although money won't bring your loved one back, it can help
you achieve justice on their behalf and secure your family's future well - being.
With a tradition of service to families in Bergen County and northern New Jersey that goes back to the 1930s, the attorneys of Breslin & Breslin work hard to
achieve justice on behalf of people whose reliance on nursing homes for safe and dependable care has proved to be misplaced.
Not exact matches
Supreme Court
justices disagree
on the virtues of diversity and the means for
achieving it.
«As Hispanic Catholics in the U.S
achieve upward mobility, they may become a little more conservative
on social
justice and concern for the poor,» Dillon says, «but currently many of the issues that are especially important to Catholics in Latin America are also very important to Hispanic Catholics in the U.S.»
Because the birth control cases all focus
on a 1993 federal law, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, not the Constitution, the
Justices will face questions about whether the mandate to provide free access to 20 forms of birth control drugs or devices, sterilization, screenings, and counseling imposes a «substantial burden»
on religious freedom of nonprofit employers with religious objections to some or all contraceptives, whether the mandate in fact serves a «compelling interest» of the government, and whether an attempt to provide an exemption from the mandate satisfies the requirement that such an accommodation is «the least restrictive means» of
achieving the government's policy interest.
Much of the motivation for this form of action for
justice depends
on hope for success in
achieving the declared goals within a foreseeable time span.
A non-Marxian and more insidious justification for reliance
on minimum wage legislation to
achieve distribution equity is founded
on a twisted interpretation of traditional scholastic teaching
on economic
justice.
Third, the context has shifted: in contrast to the traditional Catholic conception of the political community, and politics within such communities, as the means of
achieving real if limited
justice for human life in the world, and a corresponding theory of international relations, recent Catholic thought
on war often treats the state as a locus of injustice and the goals of particular states as inherently at odds with the achievement of common human goals, while an internationalism defined in terms of the United Nations system is proposed as the best means to those common goals.
Freedom is not and can not be
achieved unless the society is based
on justice, radical
justice, in which the worth of every life is equally affirmed.
We've just got to work harder, get more politically involved, and stay strong until we've successfully
achieved justice and peace
on earth.»
I am confident that the prosecutors in Florida have ample statutory authority to deal with the case and that the Florida law
on self - defense will not be an impediment to
achieving justice.
Second, Ed Miliband's Labour was highly divided
on how to
achieve the equilibrium between the two elements in the golden formula of social
justice and healthy finances.
LAGOS — As President Muhammadu Buhari is set to touch ground today in Ogun State
on a two - day state visit, former Attorney - General and Minister of
Justice, Prince Bola Ajibola (SAN), has lent his voice
on how he will
achieve success in anti-corruption fight and governance.
Think, for example, of what IDS has
achieved on social
justice and David Davis
on civil libertarianism.
On the podcast, Gangi said that when the mayor was elected in 2013, he was hopeful that policing and criminal justice reform would be achieved, based on de Blasio's campaign rhetori
On the podcast, Gangi said that when the mayor was elected in 2013, he was hopeful that policing and criminal
justice reform would be
achieved, based
on de Blasio's campaign rhetori
on de Blasio's campaign rhetoric.
«Today,
on the first day of 2018, we celebrate how far Rockland County has come in just four short years and, as importantly, how much more we will
achieve going forward,» Day said after taking the oath of office, administered by Clarkstown
Justice Craig E. Johns.
(3) Neither the Executive Committee nor the County Leader shall designate, nominate or propose any candidate for judicial offices which are to be elected county - wide in New York County, or which are to be proposed for appointment by the Mayor of the City of New York or by the Governor of the State of New York, exclusive of recommendations for interim appointment by the Mayor or the Governor, unless such candidate shall have been approved in that calendar year for such office by the independent panel., except that once a candidate for the office of
Justice of the Supreme Court has been reported as highly qualified by at least two of the last four independent screening panels for that office, that candidate shall be considered as having been approved by the panel for such office during each of the four calendar years after the year in which the candidate shall have last achieved such status, (not counting a year in which there are no vacancies for the office of Justice of the Supreme Court other than a vacancy resulting from the expiration of the term of office of a justice eligible for and seeking re-election to that office, or a vacancy which has been filled by an interim Supreme Court justice seeking re-election who has been appointed by the Governor and who satisfies the requirements of sub-paragraph 4 (b), provided in each case that such justice has been determined by the independent panel to merit continuation in office), and such candidate shall not make application to the panel during any of such years unless the Committee on the Judiciary shall require the candidate to make such an appli
Justice of the Supreme Court has been reported as highly qualified by at least two of the last four independent screening panels for that office, that candidate shall be considered as having been approved by the panel for such office during each of the four calendar years after the year in which the candidate shall have last
achieved such status, (not counting a year in which there are no vacancies for the office of
Justice of the Supreme Court other than a vacancy resulting from the expiration of the term of office of a justice eligible for and seeking re-election to that office, or a vacancy which has been filled by an interim Supreme Court justice seeking re-election who has been appointed by the Governor and who satisfies the requirements of sub-paragraph 4 (b), provided in each case that such justice has been determined by the independent panel to merit continuation in office), and such candidate shall not make application to the panel during any of such years unless the Committee on the Judiciary shall require the candidate to make such an appli
Justice of the Supreme Court other than a vacancy resulting from the expiration of the term of office of a
justice eligible for and seeking re-election to that office, or a vacancy which has been filled by an interim Supreme Court justice seeking re-election who has been appointed by the Governor and who satisfies the requirements of sub-paragraph 4 (b), provided in each case that such justice has been determined by the independent panel to merit continuation in office), and such candidate shall not make application to the panel during any of such years unless the Committee on the Judiciary shall require the candidate to make such an appli
justice eligible for and seeking re-election to that office, or a vacancy which has been filled by an interim Supreme Court
justice seeking re-election who has been appointed by the Governor and who satisfies the requirements of sub-paragraph 4 (b), provided in each case that such justice has been determined by the independent panel to merit continuation in office), and such candidate shall not make application to the panel during any of such years unless the Committee on the Judiciary shall require the candidate to make such an appli
justice seeking re-election who has been appointed by the Governor and who satisfies the requirements of sub-paragraph 4 (b), provided in each case that such
justice has been determined by the independent panel to merit continuation in office), and such candidate shall not make application to the panel during any of such years unless the Committee on the Judiciary shall require the candidate to make such an appli
justice has been determined by the independent panel to merit continuation in office), and such candidate shall not make application to the panel during any of such years unless the Committee
on the Judiciary shall require the candidate to make such an application.
But lord chief
justice Lord Bingham said: «The democratic process is liable to be subverted if,
on a question of moral and political judgment, opponents of the act
achieve through the courts what they could not
achieve in parliament.»
Monday 11 March 2013 2.30 pm Oral Questions Plans to tackle inequality in income and wealth in the UK - Lord Dubs Consequences for access to
justice for those who will not be able to receive free legal advice
on social welfare law matters from 1 April - Lord Bach Future railway re-openings - Lord Faulkner of Worcester Progress towards
achieving the projected increase in the size of the UK's reserve forces - Lord Rosser Legislation Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill - Report stage (Day 4)- Viscount Younger of Leckie Short Debate Recommendations of the Francis Report into the Mid-Staffordshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust - Lord Patel Short Debate Impact of NHS innovation and research strategies
on health improvement and wealth creation - Lord Kakkar
Supreme Court
justices disagree
on the virtues of diversity and the means for
achieving it.
He thought there was, and created Educational
Justice Activists, a nonprofit that enlists high -
achieving juniors and seniors and allows them to pair with struggling, younger students for one -
on - one tutoring and mentoring, for a span of two years.
Ali, R., & Pérez, T.E. Guidance
on the Voluntary Use of Race to
Achieve Diversity and Avoid Racial Isolation in Elementary and Secondary Schools (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of
Justice, Civil Rights Division and U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights, December 2011).
Breathing Joy and
Justice into School and Community Leadership is an interactive, four - day institute utilizing the latest research
on achieving collective impact for equitable and excellent schools.
This initiative will be dedicated to fighting the victimization of gays and lesbians worldwide and is the latest in Daniel Loeb's efforts to
achieve progress and
justice for L.G.B.T. people
on a global scale.
The U.S. Departments of Education and
Justice on Tuesday sent a letter providing guidance to confirm that the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, issued last month, leaves untouched previous Court holdings
on the permissibility of race - conscious methods of
achieving diversity goals at elementary and secondary schools.
Executive Order 12898, «Federal Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low - Income Populations (February 11, 1994), (E.O. 12898 or E.O.) requires each Federal agency to «make achieving environmental justice part of its mission by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects of its programs, policies and activities on minority populations and low - income populations.
Justice in Minority Populations and Low - Income Populations (February 11, 1994), (E.O. 12898 or E.O.) requires each Federal agency to «make
achieving environmental
justice part of its mission by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects of its programs, policies and activities on minority populations and low - income populations.
justice part of its mission by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects of its programs, policies and activities
on minority populations and low - income populations.»
Executive Order (EO) 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low - Income Populations (February 11, 1994), requires each Federal agency to «make achieving environmental justice part of its mission by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects of its programs, policies, and activities on minority populations and low - income populations.
Justice in Minority Populations and Low - Income Populations (February 11, 1994), requires each Federal agency to «make
achieving environmental
justice part of its mission by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects of its programs, policies, and activities on minority populations and low - income populations.
justice part of its mission by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects of its programs, policies, and activities
on minority populations and low - income populations.»
We are going to do everything in our power to
achieve some form of
justice for her, and we are counting
on the public's help to find the person responsible» said Sophie Gaillard, Lawyer and Campaigns Manager for the Montreal SPCA's Animal Advocacy Department.
A focus
on current and future housing initiatives demonstrates how New Yorkers continue to promote subsidized housing as a way to
achieve diversity, neighborhood stability, and social
justice.
Despite this fact, the international media, at least in most developed countries, is utterly failing to report
on the ethical and
justice dimensions of issues that are so central to
achieving a favorable outcome in Warsaw.
Jessie Smith Noyes Fdn grant for «General support for an organization working to ensure that low income communities, indigenous groups, and communities of color participate in policy debates
on climate change and food
justice issues in Minnesota and the Midwest to
achieve solutions»
In summary, a strong case can be made that the US emissions reduction commitment for 2025 of 26 % to 28 % clearly fails to pass minimum ethical scrutiny when one considers: (a) the 2007 IPCC report
on which the US likely relied upon to establish a 80 % reduction target by 2050 also called for 25 % to 40 % reduction by developed countries by 2020, and (b) although reasonable people may disagree with what «equity» means under the UNFCCC, the US commitments can't be reconciled with any reasonable interpretation of what «equity» requires, (c) the United States has expressly acknowledged that its commitments are based upon what can be
achieved under existing US law not
on what is required of it as a mater of
justice, (d) it is clear that more ambitious US commitments have been blocked by arguments that alleged unacceptable costs to the US economy, arguments which have ignored US responsibilities to those most vulnerable to climate change, and (e) it is virtually certain that the US commitments can not be construed to be a fair allocation of the remaining carbon budget that is available for the entire world to limit warming to 2 °C.
Social
Justice and Environment Preservation (
achieving the Millennium Development Goals with food, water, and energy security; sustainable economic development; non-intensive agriculture; education
on climate change and environment to inform and change behavior; public health; mental health; support for small - scale farmers, women and children; rights of small - island and coastal peoples; sustainable forestry; conservation; humane treatment of animals, avoiding species extinction, maintaining biodiversity).
Because allocation of national ghg emissions is inherently a matter of
justice, nations should be required to explain how their ghg emissions reduction commitments both will lead to a specific atmospheric greenhouse gas concentration that is not dangerous, that is, what remaining ghg CO2 equivalent budget they have assumed that their commitment will
achieve, and
on what equitable basis have they determined their fair share of that budget.
Although distributive
justice would also allow for other morally relevant considerations to be considered in allocating ghg emissions that diverge from strict equality, including such considerations as historical ghg emissions levels, these other considerations can be built into a C&C framework either by negotiating the convergence dates in a C&C regime or in side - agreements
on such issues as financing technologies for low - emitting nations at levels that would allow them to
achieve per capita emissions limitations.
«How are we ever going to
achieve climate
justice,» Gualinga asks, «if we keep
on criminalizing those who are actually fighting climate change, and not just only talking about it?»
For this reason, Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs) should identify: (1) tonnes of CO2eq emissions reduced rather than a percent reduction from a baseline year, (b) the temperature limit and associated carbon budget that the INDC is seeking to
achieve, (c) the equity principles that the nation relied
on to assure the
justice of its INDC, and (d) For Annex 1 countries, ghg emissions in 1990, the common baseline year.
This latest report was made at the conclusion of these negotiations during which almost no progress was made in defining equity under UNFCCC by the Ad Hoc Working Group
on Durban Platform For Enhanced Action (ADP), a mechanism under the UNFCCC that seeks to
achieve a adequate global climate agreement, despite a growing consensus among most observers of the UNFCCC negotiations that nations need to align their emissions reductions commitments to levels required of them by equity and
justice if the world is going to prevent extremely dangerous climate change.
Any national ghg emissions reduction commitment is implicitly a position
on two ethical questions, namely, first, what safe atmospheric ghg concentration level the commitment aims to
achieve and, second, what equity framework or principles of distributive
justice the percent reduction is based
on.
Our plan for tackling climate change is based
on the kind of
justice we had great success in
achieving this year through the courts and the political system.
When an entire issue has every appearance of looking like it's steered by emotionally - driven figurative lynch mobs whose goal is to
achieve «climate
justice» by any means possible, including negating facts from critics through character assassination, you have one very serious problem
on your hands.
«Will countries be able to
achieve a climate agreement in Paris based
on science and
justice when developed countries can't even cobble together US$ 4.7 billion for the Green Climate Fund?»
The Labor Network for Sustainability was founded in 2009 based
on an understanding that long - term sustainability can not be
achieved without environmental protection, economic fairness, and social
justice.
Any national ghg emissions reduction commitment is implicitly a position
on two ethical questions, namely, first, what safe atmospheric ghg concentration level the commitment is designed to
achieve and, second, what equity framework or principles of distributive
justice the INDC is based
on.
Although some nations have acknowledged their ethical duties to base their INDC
on ethically justifiable criteria, almost all INDC submissions have not explained how specific emissions reductions commitments link to a specific desired atmospheric ghg concentration levels and its associated carbon budget that will provide some level of confidence that a warming limit will be
achieved nor why their ghg emissions reductions commitment is fair as a matter of distributive
justice.
Achieving emissions reductions for environmental
justice communities through climate change mitigation policy by Nicky Sheats, PhD This paper focuses
on emissions reductions for EJ communities under the Clean Power Plan in particular as well as climate change mitigation policy in general and argues that these reductions should be both mandatory and planned.
It's part of the special issue
on Achieving 1.5 °C and Climate
Justice
Many law review presidents and editors have gone
on to
achieve great success and wield great influence: Barack Obama was the first black president of the Harvard Law Review; Brooksley Born — who warned against impending global economic crisis and was awarded the John F. Kennedy Medal of Courage this year — was the first woman president of the Stanford Law Review; former Chief
Justice of the United States William H. Rehnquist, and former Associate Justice Sandra Day O'Connor — the first woman Supreme Court justice — were both Stanford Law Review e
Justice of the United States William H. Rehnquist, and former Associate
Justice Sandra Day O'Connor — the first woman Supreme Court justice — were both Stanford Law Review e
Justice Sandra Day O'Connor — the first woman Supreme Court
justice — were both Stanford Law Review e
justice — were both Stanford Law Review editors.