Not exact matches
On 4 December, the journal removed the
article from its subscription - based Web site and posted a notice that
acknowledged that «Mr. Liberman and Nemesysco Limited... were not invited to comment on the
article prior to its
publication where, in view
of the content
of the
article, it would have been appropriate to invite them to do so.»
I received three emails from an editor at a major magazine
acknowledging the upcoming
publication of three
articles — written by three
of my authors — each
of which will carry my authors» bylines and refer readers back to their book Web sites.
Last time I checked over 75,000 people read that
article and there was even a
publication put out by one
of the lobby groups entitled «Why You Should Have a Screening Mammogram» (and avoid reading garbage on the internet) that was a point by point refutation
of my position without
acknowledging my
article based on both smearing me and authoritarianisms like «only read peer reviewed
article in reputable journals».
They are referring to a 1971
article written by climatologist Stephen Schneider, in which he did, indeed, make that prediction; however, as he himself now
acknowledges, new evidence soon followed its
publication that suggested that 1) the cooling impact
of aerosols was not nearly as high as originally estimated and 2) there were many other gases in the atmosphere, including methane, CFCs and ozone, that had the same warming effect as carbon dioxide.