It is almost the same as «will» because «can» is being applied to humans and you have to accept that humans simply don't
act in a rational way (most of the time).
Not exact matches
Empirically, people rarely
act in ways that economists consider
rational.
The notion of creation combines
rational work with free
act,
in such a
way that contingency is no longer the result of imperfection, but expresses the freedom of the almighty Creator:
Thus we speak of a formula as being true if it represents correctly the
way in which certain physical elements
act in relation to one another, and a syllogism is said to be true when the final statement
in a series of statements is derived by
rational necessity from the others
in the series.
There is no
rational reason that the lives of these men should collide, just as there's no
rational reason that a man with everything would
act in the
way of a desperate man who has nothing or that a man who has achieved everything he could
in his career would have nothing.
Rational folks
act in such infuriating
ways for the policy folks.
It added: «As an urgent next step, we have asked the regulators to explore the possibility of agreeing a common view so that we can
act to remove the uncertainty for schools and colleges
in England and Wales, and ensure a coherent and
rational way forward for all our candidates.»
Whilst there may be a few surprises
in store (though I'm not sure that the SA situation has turned out that well), I don't expect humans, collectively, to
act in any
way that could be regarded as
rational.
Collective action dilemma occurs when you have a group of people all
acting in a perfectly
rational way for their own interests
in the short term.
REBT can help clients to strengthen their conviction
in alternative
rational beliefs by
acting in ways that are consistent with them and thus encourage a healthier outlook.