Are
we acting in this way because there is no reason to do otherwise?
Des Lennon, representing Morris, said she was «genuinely remorseful» and his client had
acted in this way because her own father was absent and she wanted to give Darcy the «chance she never had».
Not exact matches
The
act of simplification is great for leaders
because it encourages new
ways of looking at old problems, and sets a standard of continuous improvement that can (and will) become infectious
in your business or organization.
Execs have little incentive to
act in the best interests of their companies
because of the
way they are paid, creating an ugly economic chain reaction.
This world is a dangerous place to live, not
because of the good people that often
act in irrational and / or criminally wrongdoing
ways within the confines of their individual minds, core or enterprise groups, but
because of the good people that don't do anything about it (like reveal the truth through education like Financial Samauri is doing!).
It clerly used the word MURDER Such word has been used regarding the killing of Bin laden, with the excuse that
because, it is true that he was instrumental
in the brutal and inhumane killing of inocent people at the TOWERS, however we must not
act in the same
way or use the same words that such criminal terrorist use, or we should not
act similar as they
acted, if we don't want to be looked as wild uncivilized people as they are.
Stereotypes form
because there is a large population that
acts in a certain
way, regardless of the fact that not all of that population
act in that
way.
It's silly) And since the belief and the book can be used to justify evil actions, then it's really about how YOU interpret the belief,
because others can interpret it
in a completely different
way and
act «immoral» by their exegesis.
Perhaps the song is also suggesting that the reason he is forgiven is
because his
act of betrayal fits into God's plan for the
way in which Jesus would redeem humankind.
The best
way to meet Boswell's argument is to grant for a moment that the O.T. prohibitions reflect idolatrous worship practices, that homosexual
acts are wrong
because they are used liturgically
in false worship of false gods and goddesses.
But for Jesus there is no other
way because only
in this
act can he be the resurrection and the life for the world.
He is the God who
acts in Christ, translating Hosea's vision into actuality and making it possible for men to repent, as Israel could not,
because he assures them,
in the most objective
way possible, that they are already accepted by him.
The highest cause may be (1)
in every sense or aspect «uncaused,»
in no sense or aspect the effect of anything else; or it may be (2)
in some aspects uncaused, and
in others causally influenced, but its manner of both
acting and receiving influences may be the highest conceivable, hence absolutely «perfect,» although even so its whole being may not
in every sense be perfect,
because the influences as coming from other causes, say human beings, may be less admirable than they might be; or the supreme cause may be (3)
in no sense or aspect uncaused, independent of other powers, hence
in no
way wholly exempt from the imperfections of the latter...
What a question i was so pondering upon this i burnt the potatoes for tea but i managed to rescue them from the brink of distruction any
way where was i. To me love is not the
act in itself
because that is a response to love or to be loved.Nor is it a feeling
because sometimes we choose to love others despite our feelings we lay aside our own desires for the sake of others.Nor is love confined to reason
because it isnt always logical or reasonable and can be totally illogical.
13 This freedom is not conditioned
in any
way by anything other than Godself: «God loves
because he loves;
because this
act is His being, His essence and His nature... God's loving is necessary, for it is the being, the essence and the nature of God,» but this is a necessity grounded
in God's freedom and nowhere else.14
In simpler terms, it suggests that players should
act a certain
way because the individuals who make the decisions that afford them their careers demand they must.
If I was living on the wrong path leading to death with all the dumb things I was doing like listening to bad music, goofing around
in class, cussing,
acting like I was a gangster, wanting to try drugs, being suicidal and being around with close friends that are doing the bad then he can change you too
because, I tell you that if you think that your life will go for the worst if you accept them then you're wrong
because, if you have faith
in him and you accept him as your savior and follow his
ways then he has your road all planned out, he's going to give you such blessings and a happiness and love that compares to none others.
Because of God's transcendence it would be mythological to refer to God's action
in terms appropriate only to objects available,
in principle at least, to ordinary sense perception.13 This especially means that one can not speak of God
in terms of the categories of time and space; 14 i.e., whatever is predicated of God can not apply only to some particular time and space, but must apply equally to all times and spaces.15 Thus the implication of Ogden's criterion for non-mythological language about God corresponds to his statement of several years ago, that «there is not the slightest evidence that God has
acted in Christ
in any
way different from the
way in which he primordially
acts in every other event.
It is also good to opt for family counselors who would definitely be the right person to show as wells guide the right
way of thinking and
acting in such crisis times of life The right thing would be to take control of oneâ $ ™ s emotions and
act prudent enough
because the life of not one but two are at stake
in problematic affairs.
Yes, we need to, as Christians, LIVE God's
way, but we also need to be light and salt and not just stick our head
in the sand and
act like... or give the impression that... homosexual marriage, genocide, and abortion are ok, by our lack of speaking out
because we're too busy living our own little holy lives.
The article is describing how people are finally waking up and realizing that yes natural disasters MIGHT be caused by a celestial being but that again does not mean
in ANY
way that it is
because the human race has sinned or committed some specific
act that warrented a natural disaster as punishment.
Hi my name is Lindsey and I'm recovering heroin addict and my mother is a very devoted rightous Christian her favorite saying is I am the head and not the tail meaning she is the head is far better than me and I am the tail and
because the
way Christians have treated me recently through my struggle I have felt that I should convert to Hinduism when I brought this up to my mother she told me I will go to hell
because Jesus is the only God which I do believe to an extent but I also believe
in having peace within your own life and treating others equally fairly with love respect and dignity which my mother and my sister do not do the
act as though they are better than anyone they do not sin they do not make mistakes and they are perfect
in every
way another one of her favorite sayings I'm not perfect but I'm going to try to be BC Jesus loves me that much.
I say only «largely»
because it will include facts of God's
acts, if any, which are a posteriori for him and for us such as a non-necessary decision to
act in a certain
way.
I think God speaks clearly
in these times because of his silence it means he has had enough of our ways we havent listened we have gone our own way we havent acted on what his prophets have spoken so he distances himself until such time that we will take him seriously.Thats how it was in the old testament he allowed his people to go into captivity or bondage when they refused to obey his word.We see this pattern repeated over and over for example In Egypt when they were in slavery it wasnt until the people acknowledged there sin and cried out to God to save them and he did by sending a savior moses.Because we have Christ we have grace he wont spurn us like he used to because Christ took away our reproach and he is free to love us despite our sinfulness.brent
in these times
because of his silence it means he has had enough of our
ways we havent listened we have gone our own
way we havent
acted on what his prophets have spoken so he distances himself until such time that we will take him seriously.Thats how it was
in the old testament he allowed his people to go into captivity or bondage when they refused to obey his word.We see this pattern repeated over and over for example In Egypt when they were in slavery it wasnt until the people acknowledged there sin and cried out to God to save them and he did by sending a savior moses.Because we have Christ we have grace he wont spurn us like he used to because Christ took away our reproach and he is free to love us despite our sinfulness.brent
in the old testament he allowed his people to go into captivity or bondage when they refused to obey his word.We see this pattern repeated over and over for example
In Egypt when they were in slavery it wasnt until the people acknowledged there sin and cried out to God to save them and he did by sending a savior moses.Because we have Christ we have grace he wont spurn us like he used to because Christ took away our reproach and he is free to love us despite our sinfulness.brent
In Egypt when they were
in slavery it wasnt until the people acknowledged there sin and cried out to God to save them and he did by sending a savior moses.Because we have Christ we have grace he wont spurn us like he used to because Christ took away our reproach and he is free to love us despite our sinfulness.brent
in slavery it wasnt until the people acknowledged there sin and cried out to God to save them and he did by sending a savior moses.
Because we have Christ we have grace he wont spurn us like he used to
because Christ took away our reproach and he is free to love us despite our sinfulness.brentnz
Sometimes it's wrong
because of the
ways human beings have
acted in the name of God.
Nevertheless, precisely
because moral
acts are relative
in this
way,
in all sexual relations certain promises are necessary if the parties involved are not to harm one another, affront one another's dignity, or illegitimately rob one another of their liberty.
Just
because this particular one
acting in an abhorrent
way doesn't change that.
When they
act in unsustainable
ways, this is often
because their traditional systems have been disrupted and they can survive only by destructive practices.
It makes us sound ignorant and really we should be thinking about all of those who are lost their live
in the incident or serving as troops I'm not saying that Osama's death is bad,
because personally I am quite happy about this, but we didn't
act the right
way about his death.
But that Buddhist who spends his whole life making the world a better place, feeding the hungry, healing the sick, basically all the
acts (sans miracles) that Christ lived by has no chance of salvation
because he did not believe
in the creator (the
way he was supposed to).
There is literally no
way that anyone can prove that anyone who claims to be
acting on God's commands isn't — you can't even appeal to the Bible to tell you it must be wrong
because god said
in there not to do it,
because even on the Bible he routinely commands people to do things
in specific cases that are otherwise forbidden.
If this is all that is said, an explanation is given (
in the sense of course
in which metaphysical statements aim at «explaining» anything) of the aspect
in which the
act is more, but not how the
act founded and sustained
in that
way, is not only the
act of the finite being
because it is received
in it, as Aquinas puts it, but also
because it is posited by it as a cause.
Jesus is indignant that the scribes and Pharisees (1) will not enter the kingdom of heaven themselves and stand
in the
way of others entering it as well; (2) will do almost anything to win a proselyte only to make that proselyte twice as much a child of hell as they are; (3) confuse people by senseless oaths, telling them that if they swear by the Temple, their oath is not binding, but if they swear by the gold of the Temple, it is binding - the fools ought to realize, Jesus says, that the Temple includes all that is
in it; (4) tithe some of their money but neglect justice and mercy and faith, which are weightier moral matters, when they ought both to tithe and perform these greater
acts of righteousness as well; (5) are careful about outward cleanliness but careless about the inward disposition, so that they are filled with extortion and greed; (6) appear righteous but really are hypocrites,
because their appearance hides all manner of iniquity inside; (7) pretend to revere the prophets of history whom their parents killed but continue to practice the evil of their parents by rejecting those whom God sends to them now (Matt.
Because we are sinful we
act in sinful
ways; we sin and commit sins.
In the same way, public nakedness is shameful because it incites lust, and se.xual sin is rooted in desire (the imagination of a sinful act), as implied in Exodus 20:17 and addressed by Christ in Matthew 5:2
In the same
way, public nakedness is shameful
because it incites lust, and se.xual sin is rooted
in desire (the imagination of a sinful act), as implied in Exodus 20:17 and addressed by Christ in Matthew 5:2
in desire (the imagination of a sinful
act), as implied
in Exodus 20:17 and addressed by Christ in Matthew 5:2
in Exodus 20:17 and addressed by Christ
in Matthew 5:2
in Matthew 5:28.
It's been a joy to hear from women who read A Year of Biblical Womanhood and report that where they once hated Proverbs 31, it's now one of their favorite passages
because it provides a fun
way to celebrate all those daily
acts of faithfulness exhibited by the women
in their lives.
Because of these
acts we know him to be real, accessible, and infinitely gracious, and
in that knowledge we find the promise of both the coming of his kingdom and the ultimate fulfillment of our own lives: «Through the tender mercy of our God, the dayspring from on high hath visited us, to give light to them that sit
in darkness and
in the shadow of death, to guide our feet into the
way of peace.»
I include these examples
because everyone has
acted in such
ways at some point
in their lives, and the fact that we do such ridiculous things serves to illustrate that there is some driving desire
in us that is unquenchable and irresistible.
This is simply another
way of phrasing the Christian faith itself — the faith which declares that God is love and that we are assured of this
because he
acts lovingly, above all has
acted lovingly
in the total event of Jesus Christ.
For through this shift
in the
way of thinking about them, «things» actually become for the most part more «natural»
because seen
in terms of originary and self -
acting units of process.
I simply think it might provide a moment's healthy respite from the tumultuous urgency and banality of this or any electoral cycle
because,
in its general and fabulous
way, it encourages perseverance
in hope and political virtue simply by reminding one that there are eternal harmonies that can not be silenced by the din of contending interests, and that one is best able to
act «politically»
in good conscience when one preserves a proper sense of proportion.
If God does not
act at this level «to design the universe
in a purposeful
way,» he says, then «random chance was extremely lucky,
because the outcome is there to see.»
I disagree severely and there have been many Atheist post that have declared that those of Faith
act in positive
ways because we «live
in fear» of God's judgment.
From an atheistic perspective, it is absurd, unreasonable, and irrational to anonymously give to charity
because there is no one and no God to see your «good»
act, so why give to anyone who can't return the favor
in some
way?
We may believe that God was always seeking to reveal Himself to men, but
because He had created man
in His own likeness and so had given him a degree of freedom, limited but still authentic, He could not do so until He found
in the succession of the prophets and seers of Israel men sufficiently responsive to Him to prepare the
way for His
act in the incarnation.
More commonly and subtly, a mental disorder may so distort an individual's beliefs that he may think he is doing right when
in fact an
act is terribly wrong - as, for example, when a person has the delusion that his wife has literally turned into a zombie and that shooting her is the only
way to protect himself from being eaten alive, or an inpatient attacks the attendants on his ward when they come to take him to an appointment
because he believes they are alien beings sent to kill him.
«I'm perfectly prepared to have the
Act amended along the lines of the Select Committee recommendations
because I think that it's operating
in a slightly more lax
way than was intended, but I'm not prepared to abolish it completely.
We found it
way too spicy as well, and so I googled how to counter
act spicy food
in a dish.I added two huge tablespoons of raw honey, and a generous splash of half and half.It turned out delicious Kerstin!The next time I will add less cayenne,
because I said the same thing» I should have listened to my gut), but Hubby liked it so much, I will make it exactly the same, but with the honey and half and half...
I feel that somehow
in the potty training process I screwed something up or I was disciplining him too much so he is
acting out
in this
way because he knows I can't make him poop.
but, im ok with this vardy transfer... it shows us many things: 1) wenger is changing, something some of us have been demanding for a long time; 2) it shows that wenger is taking risks: think about it, he is buying a men for a not cheap price, knowing he could not getting anything after, with a future sell i mean... this is an
act that shows wengers intentions to win something, the buy is not motivated by any financial or economic reason but only for a «get the f epl once again» reason... this is an
act that shows us hungry, even if we fail, we could said we try... first ever, we really try; 3) finally but very important... vardy is the kind of player we need... he is a warrior, a fighter... he has character... look at how he celebrate his goals... full of energy... he, like alexis, can motivate the team when the things are not going
in our
way (something wenger cant do
because of his age and
because he has never been an active coach on the pitch)... the vardy transfer, if it finish well, is a demostration of a change, and a good one... lets take care of winning things and do nt look the economic side for once... vardy is a bit old, but we can give a chance to welbeck after maybe, or akpom... u are not thinking about the future when we talk about ibra... guys: u complain when wenger do nt spend or
because he is always looking for the bargain when u are the guys who has to pay the very expensive tickets... u complain when wenger buy the always for the future guy... like morata... stop to complain for everything and be consequent with yourself... i would love auba, but it is not going to happen... lukaku is awesome but the asking price is stupid... lets try with vardy, give us the throphy..