Not exact matches
A one -
of - a-kind
film that really makes other movies» depictions
of sex seem very shallow, this one doesn't have the best
acting, or writing, but it's interestingly
structured and makes it point very well.
Pearce, meanwhile, pulls off a tricky hire - wire
act of his own, keeping the
film's whodunnit
structure tightly screwed without lapsing too far into genre contrivance — with the many, varied screeches and squeaks
of Jim Williams» terrifically rattling score lending a significant hand in this regard.
Though it does have its own version
of a three -
act structure, this
film is not a conventional narrative that will fit into a tidy box and it's not a story so much as an experience.
About the resilience
of one man's mind, body, and spirit in the face
of unending pain and indignity, Angelina Jolie «s POW prestige piece («a true story», according to the
film's intro) is an excruciating watch, but the too neatly - packaged
structuring and presentation
act as something
of a blockade between us and Zamperini's mind.
They clearly were
films of high quality, well -
acted and well shot, but the subject matter and plot
structure did not engage me in the slightest.
Such sequences have become the keystone
of modern action
films, a set - piece as familiar as the three -
act structure.
I Used to Live Here, like all great neo-realist
films, bears a very poignant, deliberate message that culminates in the closing moments, and is crucially told depicted via the more ardent elements
of filmmaking, i.e. — script -
structure, editing, framing and
acting.
The
film's one - note thematic
structure suggests that the boy's stop - start journeys into manhood, bolstered by Christian values, will find worthiness in a single
act of selfless courage.
There is a pretty clear three
act structure at work in Life
of Pi, partially because
of the bizarre choice
of a framing device to introduce and conclude the
film.
Gook is similar in
structure and tone to Spike Lee's masterpiece Do the Right Thing, in that both
films use their first two
acts to give the audience a false sense
of comfort, only to let racial tension slowly boil beneath the surface before exploding in tragedy at the end
of the
film.
When a Twitter user asked Landis why he thought the villagers in the original
film didn't stop the werewolf themselves, the screenwriter revealed that he's exploring this detail in his script, and it will account for one
of the biggest deviations from the original
film: «Answering this question and the nature
of the village's role in the plot in the second and third
act as
of now are the biggest changes I've made to the original
structure... Doing some fun stuff.»
So even the first
film's
structure is replicated, beat - for - beat: at the end
of 21's second
act, the pair's partnership flailed after a chase scene caused Schmidt to miss a school play; the end
of 22's second
act sees the same occur, only this time, it's because a chase scene causes Jenko to miss a football game.
Instead
of a three
act structure, this
film takes a three
film structure; none
of which has a beginning, middle and end.
While Felix von Groeningen «s
film, which centers around a couple whose child is diagnosed with cancer, could easily have strayed into maudlin territory, the deft, non-chronological
structure and the constantly surprising, beautiful performances — both
acting and the musical — elevate it well clear
of any Movie
of the Week associations.
One could argue the tonal disconnect between an
act of terrorism and comedy, and yet the injection
of some quips and the odd running joke about a producer obsessed with balls turns out to be one
of the
film's greatest weapons, moreso than the overly familiar stench
of disdain and dissidence as a poorly planned hostage stunt yields a much more complex discussion about class
structure and the corruption
of the American financial system.
It propels the
film into a tightly
structured first
act focused on character motivations, which unfortunately leads to a second
act that loses a bit
of that momentum.
With Wiseman's
films, it's often tempting to try and work out the underlying
structure, even while you're watching them, to break them down into discrete sequences, and thereby discern the broader thematic movements or
acts (depending on your artistic analogue
of choice).
Addressing the
structure of the medium, the nature
of the cinematic experience, the relationship between still and moving image, the quality
of illusion, the power
of narrative, the live
act and its representation, Wallinger's
film and video works have explored an astonishing thematic range with great intelligence and originality.
Following the three
acts of traditional
film narrative, it is
structured according to the three phases
of description, situation and condition.