Instead of acting as a reasonable person would
act under the same circumstances, a beach patrol professional is required to act in the same manner that a reasonable beach patrol professional (with the same circumstances, training, and education) would have acted.
Not exact matches
For example, in a motor vehicle accident case, a defendant driver owes all other drivers on the road to
act as a reasonably prudent and careful driver would
act under the
same or similar
circumstances.
«Would a reasonable person,
acting under similar
circumstances, have
acted in the
same way?»
Medical malpractice claims occur when a doctor
acts or fails to
act in a manner in which a reasonably prudent doctor (with the
same training, education, and practicing in the
same field of medicine) would
act under the
same set of
circumstances.
For example, if a person dies on the operating table because the anesthesiologist administers too much anesthesia, then the question becomes whether a properly trained anesthesiologist,
under the exact
same circumstances, would have
acted differently.
The
Act lists a variety of proceedings in respect of which there is no limitation period (section 16): proceedings for declarations; proceedings to enforce court orders and other orders that are enforceable in the
same way as court orders; proceedings
under the Family Law
Act relating to support; proceedings to enforce arbitration awards; proceedings by persons in possession of collateral to redeem or realize on it; proceedings arising from sexual assault in certain
circumstances; proceedings to recover fines, taxes and penalties owing to the Crown; proceedings relating to claims by the Crown (or by a delivery agent
under social welfare legislation) in various
circumstances; proceedings to recover money owing in respect of certain student loans, awards and grants.
The definition of negligence is the failure to
act with the level of care that a reasonable person would have exercised
under the
same or similar
circumstances.
The property owner will normally be held to the standard of care of a reasonable person
acting under the
same or similar
circumstances.
Negligence is defined as the failure by someone to
act with the level of care that a reasonable person would have exercised
under the
same or similar
circumstances.
Any person who, without lawful excuse, knowing or having reason to believe the
same to have been stolen or obtained in any way whatsoever
under such
circumstances that if the
act had been committed in Kenya the person committing it would have been guilty of a felony or misdemeanour, receives or has in his possession any property so stolen or obtained outside Kenya, is guilty of an offence of the like degree (whether felony or misdemeanour) and is liable to imprisonment for seven years.
The Second Motion Judge concluded «In my view, it is essentially an alternative theory of liability for the
same complaint... I agree with the Plaintiffs that the Amended Claim does not advance a «new cause of action» for the purposes of the Limitations
Act and
under normal
circumstances an amendment would be permissible
under Rule 26.01 [of the Rules of Civil Procedure, R.R.O. 1990, Reg.
Under the new Rules, dual agency, the practice of
acting on behalf of both the buyer and seller on the
same trade, will be prohibited except in extremely limited
circumstances.
The licensee
acting for the second buyer should also advise the second buyer to obtain legal advice
under the
same circumstances.