And yet, in the midst of the furor 2001 - 2003, we often
acted against the insurer's wishes in order to save their hide.
Not exact matches
And health
insurers, once considered to be a beneficiary of the Affordable Care
Act, aren't really a solid Clinton proxy, as many have been withdrawing from the Obamacare marketplaces, casting shade on the law (not to mention that Clinton has spoken out
against mergers between some of the largest players, including the proposed Aetna (aet)- Humana (hum) and Anthem (antm)- Cigna (ci) deals).
Last June, Faso voted in favor of the cynically dubbed Protecting Access to Care
Act of 2017, a bill that sides with
insurers,
against the rights of patients who have been injured by medical malpractice.
In the U.S., the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination
Act (Gina), signed by President Bush last May, makes it illegal for employers and health
insurers to use their employees» or customers» genetic information to discriminate
against them.
It also clears the way for motor accident victims to seek redress directly from the Motor
Insurers» Bureau (MIB) by relying exclusively on European Union (EU) law, independently of the complex and sometimes conflicting provisions of Pt VI of the Road Traffic
Act 1988; the European Communities Rights
Against Insurers Regulations 2002; the Motor Vehicles (Compulsory Insurance)(Information Centre and Compensation Body) Regulations 2003 and / or the MIB's private law agreements with the Secretary of State for Transport set out in four concurrent schemes.
It therefore sought to establish that it was not liable to cover Barrington's liability to Impact under its professional indemnity insurance agreement as per the Third Parties (Rights
Against Insurers)
Act 1930.
The
insurer denied coverage to Mr. Hoang, and the plaintiffs were forced to bring an action for coverage, under section 258 (1) of the Insurance
Act directly
against the defendant
insurer to have the insurance money payable under Mr. Hoang's motor vehicle policy applied toward satisfaction of the judgment.
Justin Anisman
acted as counsel for the successful plaintiffs and their subrogating
insurer against a negligent welder.
When it comes to Third Parties (Rights
Against Insurers), where the 1930
Act applies, the 2010
Act does not.
Acting for a major hotel group in arbitration proceedings
against their
insurer in respect of property damage and business interaction losses of around US$ 30m arising out of the December 2004 Tsunami.
Cathrine Grubb examines the impact of the coming into force of the Third Parties (Rights
Against Insurers)
Act 2010
392 Despite anything in this
Act, any person may insure
against fire any property situated in Ontario in an exchange not licensed under this
Act, and any property so insured or to be insured may be inspected and any loss incurred in respect thereof adjusted, if such insurance is effected outside Ontario and without any solicitation in Ontario directly or indirectly on the part of the
insurer.
306, 665 A. 2d 112 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1995)-- This appeal arose out of the trial of an arson case in which the
insurer was allowed to introduce otherwise hearsay evidence in order to defend itself
against allegations of bad faith and violations of Connecticut's Unfair Trade Practices
Act.
113 Despite anything in this
Act, any person may insure property situated in Ontario
against fire with an unlicensed
insurer, and any property insured or to be insured under this section may be inspected and any loss incurred in respect thereof adjusted, if such insurance is effected outside Ontario and without any solicitation whatsoever directly or indirectly on the part of the
insurer.
Michelle Crorie Qualified: 2001 Made partner: 2012 Key cases:
Acting for
insurers in relation to coverage litigation arising out of a kidnap and ransom policy in a dispute valued in excess of $ 3m; represented Sea Shepherd UK over claims that it helped facilitate an attack on a fishing boat belonging to Fish & Fish, in a campaign
against illegal fishing.
Sophie advises and
acts in insurance matters, including the construction of insurance policy wordings, breach of warranty claims, avoidance of policies of insurance for misrepresentation and non-disclosure and claims under the Third Parties (Rights
Against Insurers)
Act 1930.
WSP
acted as a trusted advisor to the municipality but never suggested that it could be liable for the damage — even though, as it turned out, WSP had notified its own
insurer in 2013 that there might be a potential claim
against it.
Damian also undertakes other liability work for major
insurers, under public liability policies, including product liability cases and claims arising out of property damage.He has considerable experience of
acting in claims
against Independent Financial Advisers, investment managers, accountants, actuaries and other professionals associated with the financial services sector, as well as solicitors and insurance brokers.
Irene EM [2014] Lloyds Report IR 243; [2014] Lloyds Report 349: Chris
acted for the Defendants in this matter which concerned a claim by the shipowners
against Hull and Machinery
insurers and also her IV and ACR
insurers.
The A: Chris
acted for the owners and managers of a large motor yacht in a claim
against their
insurers and brokers arising out of
insurers» refusal to indemnify the owners
against a personal injury claim being pursued in the USA.
Francesca Kaye & Elliot Elsey herald the coming into force of the Third Parties (Rights
Against Insurers)
Act 2010
The firm
acts for a heavyweight list of international
insurers and Lloyd's syndicates, including XL Catlin Insurance, in claims brought
against insured professionals in the legal, construction, accountancy and financial services sectors.
Other key figures include Andrew Marsh, who has an extensive track record
acting for employers, contractors and their
insurers in the construction and engineering sectors; and Suzanne Wharton, who splits her time between Leeds and Manchester and focuses on high - value claims
against solicitors and financial services professionals.
During her time there she also
acted for a leading UK
insurer defending claims
against Architects and Engineers.
The firm
act on behalf of and
against major
insurers, Non-Departmental Government Bodies together with private individuals and companies.
He also
acted as lead counsel for the General Service Small / General Service Medium customer class in a multi-week hearing before the Manitoba Public Utilities Board for the first Cost of Service Review of Manitoba hydro in over 10 years, and is
acting for
acting for SNC - Lavalin as a plaintiff in a multimillion - dollar coverage claim as
against its
insurer with respect to an E&O claim regarding a major infrastructure project in Manitoba.
She is currently advising a large
insurer on whether the
acts and omissions of a solicitor which led to a multimillion - pound claim being brought
against them are covered or excluded by the insurance document.
Mr. Ackerman's portion of the presentation focused on recent developments in class action litigation
against insurers, including cases involving depreciation of labor costs, depreciation in California, application of deductibles, diminution in value on property insurance claims, Connecticut faulty concrete foundation litigation, and auto insurance cases involving the Medicare Secondary Payer
Act.
Our aligned product safety and insurance teams (including joint team members)
act for clients on product liability and product recall issues and, for those same clients, as policyholder in claims
against insurers.
His other significant success in the area of insurance bad faith include a verdict in Kieffer v. Unum Group in the amount of $ 4.3 million, including $ 3 million in punitive damages; and settlements of $ 6.75 million, $ 3 million and $ 2.9 million
against various
insurers who
acted in bad faith.
Tara
acts for professionals and their professional indemnity
insurers in a wide range of claims including claims
against solicitors, architects, valuers, financial advisors, insurance brokers, engineers and surveyors.
James also has extensive experience of
acting for
insurers and defending professional negligence claims
against solicitors, accountants and IT professionals arising out of complex corporate and commercial transactions.
Acting for a major financial institution in a LCIA arbitration
against its
insurers under a bankers blanket bond policy.
The Insurance
Act states that every motor vehicle liability policy issued in Ontario shall provide that the insured appoints the
insurer as its attorney to defend any action
against the insured arising out of the ownership, use or operation of the automobile: Insurance
Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. I. 8, s. 252 (1)(c).
Our lawyers have been counsel in cases for recovery for innocent victims of investment fraud,
acting for employers in employment fraud cases and in cases defending
insurers against fraudulent claims made
against them.
It makes no attempt to address the many egregious defects in the protection afforded to victims; both within these Motor
Insurers» Bureau (MIB) agreements as well as within Part VI of the Road Traffic
Act 1988 and the European Communities (Rights
against Insurers) Regulations 2002 (SI 2002/3061).
Some of the more frequently overlooked (and therefore dangerous) limitation periods include: i) the limitation period set out in section 38 (3) of the Trustee
Act which applies to certain claims brought by or
against the estate of a deceased person; ii) the 6 month limitation period for dependent's relief claims that is set out in section 61 of the Succession Law Reform
Act; and iii) the one year limitation period set out in section 259.1 of the Insurance
Act, which applies to «a proceeding
against an
insurer under a contract in respect of loss or damage to an automobile or its contents».
He
acts for a range of
insurers and their professional insureds, and specialises in claims
against solicitors, surveyors, accountants and insurance brokers.
We
act as
Insurers Representative on big ticket claims
against professional services organisations around the world.
Traditionally, liability insurance was written on an occurrence basis, meaning that the
insurer agreed to defend and indemnify
against any loss which allegedly «occurred» as a result of an
act or omission of the insured during the policy period.
In case of critical illness insurance policy, the insured person at his own expense must permit the
insurers to perform or do any
act of enforcing or securing the criminal rights or remedies
against the third party who has caused the loss or injury.
Furthering the conclusions of the above investigations, a show - cause notice was issued
against SBI life in April 2013, and the
insurer was questioned as to why the directions under section 34 of the
Act of refunding be not issued for refunding the referred amount which was paid as excess commissions to the members of the group (intermediaries).