Revealing to the public the active, vicious, and well - funded campaign of denial that seeks to delay
action against climate change likely constitutes a classic public good.
Drawing on case studies of past environmental debates such as those over acid rain and ozone depletion, science policy experts Roger Pielke Jr. and Daniel Sarewitz argue that once next generation technologies are available that make meaningful
action on
climate change lower - cost, then much of the argument politically over scientific uncertainty is
likely to diminish.26 Similarly, research by Yale University's Dan Kahan and colleagues suggest that building political consensus on
climate change will depend heavily on advocates for
action calling attention to a diverse mix of options, with some
actions such as tax incentives for nuclear energy, government support for clean energy research, or
actions to protect cities and communities
against climate risks, more
likely to gain support from both Democrats and Republicans.