Sentences with phrase «action against employees»

Quite aside from the fines that can be imposed, taking disciplinary action against some employees who contravene the no smoking ban while turning a blind eye to others would almost certainly be unfair.
The principle that the motives of a legislative body are «unknowable» and «deliberative secrecy» do not apply to public employers, the School Board in this case, that decide to take disciplinary action against employees, even if an in camera meeting is ordered.
The principle that the motives of a legislative body are «unknowable» and deliberative secrecy do not apply to public employers, the School Board in this case, that decides to take disciplinary action against employees, even if an in camera meeting is ordered.
Employers can not fire, demote, or take any other adverse action against employees who take legally protected FMLA leave.
Two years ago, the Ontario Securities Commission revised its credit for co-operation program, which, among other things, requires officers and directors to be available for interviews and for companies to take action against employees engaged in wrongdoing.
As a result of the breaches of privacy, the Plaintiffs commenced a class action against the employees of the Hospital (who allegedly accessed the records), as well as against the Hospital itself for failing to supervise those employees.
Chrysler executives said that would take appropriate disciplinary action against any employees imbibing before working on the assembly line.
Every day, companies take action against employees who make unlawful statements about co-workers, or create hostile work environments.
So before taking any action against employees who refuse to work, consider guidance from public authorities and whatever other employers in the same geographic area are doing.
In so doing, it created a new definition of supervisor, essentially as someone who can take tangible actions against the employee, for example, by hiring, firing, or promoting them.
Businesses and banks are in the news for being corrupt and leaders are accused of horrible actions against employees.
Keep a record of all acts of bullying so you have a case, should human resources look at disciplinary action against that employee.
When in doubt, employers should consult an employment attorney to ensure that they are complying with all laws when taking any adverse action against an employee.
Similarly there is no mandated time for the employer to take action against the employee during the active period of the posting.
These types of cases can be complicated because the employer will always try to justify their actions against an employee.
The employer is not able to take any actions against an employee simply because he or she filed a claim.
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits an employer from taking these actions against an employee based on the employee's race, national origin, gender or religion:
«The principles that the motives of a legislative body are «unknowable» and deliberative secrecy do not apply to a public employer the Board in this case, that decides to take disciplinary action against an employee, even if an in camera meeting is ordered,» said the ruling.
Workplace pregnancy discrimination is any type of adverse employment action against an employee or job candidate based upon the fact that the woman is pregnant.
Employees may seek to bring claims against their employers arising out of the subject matter of an investigation, or how the investigation is handled; conversely, an employer may wish to take action against an employee implicated in the conduct under investigation.
(4) No employer or person acting on behalf of an employer shall take any of the following actions against an employee because the employee has acted in accordance with or has sought the enforcement of this Act:
If an employer takes an adverse action against an employee because they took protected FMLA leave, it may be held liable for violating the employee's rights.
Continue to prohibit an employer from taking any discriminatory action against an employee for reporting an offence to a lawful authority
Thou shalt not take adverse action against an employee in response to the employee's protected activity.
The CEO stated that Coinbase will pursue legal action against the employee or contractor that released confidential information on the company's digital asset integration plans.
When a company contemplates taking adverse action against an employee or applicant based on information found in a background check, the subject of the check has a right to a copy of the report.
This question is relevant when employers use information in a consumer report collected by a third - party Consumer Reporting Agency, like a background screening company, to take adverse action against an employee or applicant.

Not exact matches

Reuters reports that while ZTE dismissed the four executives, it took no action against the other employees, and Ross says the company continued to lie to government investigators even after the settlement.
Should an employee refuse to participate, don't take disciplinary action against him or her, says Lauro.
You agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless NBCUniversal, its affiliates and their respective directors, officers, employees and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, suits or proceedings, as well as any and all losses, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses (including reasonable legal fees and costs) arising out of or accruing from (a) any breach of these terms, including any of the foregoing provisions, representations or warranties, and / or from your placement or transmission of any content onto NBCUniversal's servers, and / or from any and all use of your account; (b) any material posted or otherwise provided by you (including without limitation User Content), or any other subscriber or user of your account that infringes any intellectual property right of any person or entity or defames any person or violates their rights of publicity or privacy; (c) any misrepresentation made by you in connection with your use of the online services; and (d) any breach of any of the representation, warranties or other terms or conditions relating to use of your User Content or the online services.
Most recently, an anonymous employee aired a slew of grievances against her former employer, ZocDoc, a Yelp - like service for finding doctors, and said she had hired a lawyer to pursue action.
«WrkRiot is considering legal action against a disgruntled former employee who has launched a slanderous campaign against WrkRiot and some of its employees via social media,» the post begins, going on to accuse the former employee of attempting to extort $ 50,000 from the company.
A potentially devastating lawsuit against ride - hailing company Uber over its classification of drivers as contractors instead of employees is entering an important phase: determining whether drivers can sue together through a class action.
For his part, Travis Kalanick responded by calling the actions Fowler described as «abhorrent & against everything we believe in,» adding that any Uber employee condoning such behaviour would be fired.
SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters)- A lawsuit filed by drivers against ride service Uber should not proceed as a class action, the company argued in a court filing on Thursday, citing written statements of support from hundreds of other Uber drivers in a case that could decide whether they are independent contractors or employees.
«The PSA is always significantly involved with processes, investigations and decisions which result in serious disciplinary actions against any BC Public Service employees,» wrote Whitmarsh.
Attorney Jonathan Delshad filed two class - action lawsuits against Wells Fargo in September on behalf of former employees, including one business banker, who say they were fired for refusing to create fake accounts to hit sales quotas.
Various law firms filed a class action lawsuit last week against Westminster - based brake company Knorr - Bremse AG and its local Pennsylvania rival Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp. on behalf of employees affected by their «no poach» agreements.
Allegations of excessive index fund fees in retirement plans are at the heart of a new proposed class action lawsuit brought by New York Life Insurance Co. employees against the company.
Under what circumstances is it appropriate to lay criminal charges against a publicly listed corporation for the actions of its employees?
This is not the first instance of an established company taking legal action against a startup founded by some of its former employees.
(1) Any customer who enters into a contract with an invention promoter and who is found by a court to have been injured by any material false or fraudulent statement or representation, or any omission of material fact, by that invention promoter (any agent, employee, director, officer, partner, or independent contractor of such invention promoter), or by the failure of that invention promoter to disclose such information as required under subsection (a), may recover in a civil action against the invention promoter (or the officers, directors, or partners of such invention promoter), in addition to reasonable costs and attorneys» fees --
Bartz argued that the Employee Retirement Income Security Act would now pre-empt state law under the rule and that the rule improperly created a private right of action that could set up class - action lawsuits against insurance companies and agents.
While this is not the first time an established company has attempted legal action against its former employees — in January, Tesla sued its former director of Autopilot for poaching people to join his new startup — this is the first time Waymo has taken such action.
A San Francisco federal judge, in what was apparently the first case to cite last month's SCOTUS opinion Cyan v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund remanded a securities class action against a blockchain startup to San Francisco Superior Court while keeping another in federal court.
Last month, WestJet Airlines filed an appeal after the Supreme Court of British Columbia refused to throw out a proposed class - action lawsuit accusing the company of fostering a corporate culture that tolerates harassment against female employees.
If an employee is feeling discriminated against or harassed they can open up the app to talk to a professional advisor, then create an action plan to either address the issue or file a formal complaint.
The actions will serve as settlement for FTC's charges against the ride - hailing company for deceiving customers by failing to monitor the access of Uber employees on personal information of riders and for failing to secure sensitive customer information that is stored in the cloud.
You will not receive any payment for such use and waive any right to bring any action in law or equity against the aforementioned parties, their parents and related companies, affiliates, and licensees, and their past, present and future officers, agents, representatives, employees, service providers, successors and assigns for such use.
You agree to indemnify, defend and hold the USTA Family of Companies, the USTA» Family of Companies» subsidiaries and other affiliated companies / organizations and sponsors and their respective officers, directors, employees and agents harmless from and against any third - party claims, demands, actions, suits, proceedings, liabilities, damages, losses, judgments and expenses (including, but not limited to, the costs of collection, reasonable attorney's fees and other reasonable costs of defense or enforcing your obligations hereunder) resulting from or arising out of any breach of any of your representations or misuse of this or any other USTA Family of Companies site or of any site linking to this or any other USTA Family of Companies site.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z