«This is a class
action arising out of Defendants» failure to perform the material terms of an offer made to Plaintiff and other consumers comprising the class for a Starwood Preferred Guest («SPG»)- branded American Express credit card; namely, the promise of 35,000 hotel loyalty points, called SPG Starpoints, in exchange for $ 5,000.00 in qualifying purchases made to the card during the first six months after issuance,» Heilman said in the filing.
Not exact matches
Attorneys won affirmance
of a grant
of summary judgment in a putative medical monitoring class
action arising out of alleged neighborhood exposure to beryllium dust and fumes from
defendants» plant over the course
of many decades.
Assume that Mr. Grutman's proposed test is as follows: «If the state long - arm statute is satisfied and
defendant has engaged in purposeful conduct directed at the forum state
out of which conduct the cause
of action arises, and that conduct satisfies the minimum contacts under which substantial justice and fair play make it reasonable to hail
defendant into court there, and the forum state has an interest in providing a forum to the plaintiff, then the forum has personal jurisdiction over the
defendant for that cause
of action.»
Acting for the
defendants in respect
of substantial and complex fraud claims
arising out of a commercial transaction, which involved dealing with freezing injunctions obtained against the
defendants and the co-ordination
of actions in various jurisdictions.
Plaintiff Donald Brier brought a cause
of action against a practice group and an orthopedic surgeon, Greater Hartford Orthopedic Group P.C., and David Kruger, MD, an orthopedic surgeon (collectively,
Defendants), alleging medical malpractice
arising out of a spinal surgery that went bad.
In the
action he claims damages against the prosecution and police
defendants for conduct
arising out of his arrest, trial
Kavenga v. Wiet Peeters (2009)- Frank successfully brought an Application on behalf
of one
of the
defendants (co-applicant) pursuant to Section 31
of Workplace Safety and Insurance Act to take away the plaintiff's right to commence an
action (in tort)
arising out of a motor vehicle accident.
Seven
of these appeals
arose out of multiple
actions commenced by Mr. Van Sluytman against various
defendants regarding alleged interactions with government agencies, law enforcement officials and health care professionals in various parts
of Ontario.
The Ontario Court
of Appeal recently overturned an Order from the Ontario Superior Court
of Justice finding that Intact Insurance Company had a duty to defend a
defendant in an
action arising out of a fatal trip and fall accident which occurred while the deceased was in the course
of his employment.
Successfully represented the
defendant in a proposed international mass tort class
action arising out of the 2013 collapse
of a building in Bangladesh, obtaining a dismissal
of the
action at certification.