Sentences with phrase «action at a distance»
But he acknowledged that current physical theory makes no use of action at a distance.
religion-online.org
This week in biotech was all about action at a distance.
Hence, evidence for action at a distance is to be examined in the same critical spirit as any other evidence.
In a universe for which action at a distance is impossible and the transmission of signals is limited by the speed of light?
What is the best way to take preliminary action at a distance?
IT»S not quantum mechanics, but it is another case of spooky action at a distance.
One who accepts telepathy but denies action at a distance can appeal to some such theory.
For Einstein it was «weird action at a distance.»
We already have what could be considered faster than light travel with quantum physics sp00ky action at a distance so we already know our understanding of the physics is what is flawed, not that there is some need for a supernatural being to explain the parts of it we don't yet understand.
To an alien life form living on another planet billions of light years from us the death of an 8 year old human, while tragic to us, might be linked by what Einstein called «s p o o k y action at a distance» to an alien birth making it one of their most joyous occasions.
Newton introduced action at a distance (although he hoped to get rid of it), which allows for an immediate connection of distant events at the same time.
With the Higgs Boson we confirmed the existence of the Higgs field which goes a long way to explaining the interactions between particles on a quantum level and is giving us a peek into something that has long confounded us, what Einstein called «sp o o ky action at a distance».
«Freaky action at a distance» is no longer just the domain of physicists and gods?
Such an assumption blocks the road of inquiry, whereas the assumption that all particles of matter may be continuous leaves the road open to the possibility of eventually explaining action at a distance, starting with the hypothesis «that one portion of matter acts upon another because it is in a measure in the same place.»
So there is no «instantaneous» spooky action at a distance going on, as some common misinterpretations suggest.
Though this kind of action at a distance appears to contradict Einstein's theory of relativity, nonlocality is now a fact of life following an experiment by Alain Aspect and his co-workers during the early 1980s.
Maxwell used the later - abandoned concept of the ether to explain that electromagnetic radiation did not involve action at a distance.
They «start to recognize how action at a distance, in this case fertilizer that is applied in the larger watershed, can affect conditions locally, and that it is an unintentional process that happens over time,» Grotzer continues.
As one leading quantum expert, IBM's Charles Bennett, has said, what Einstein got wrong was characterizing entanglement as spooky action at a distance.
If the above «evidence for inflation» is somehow evidence for God then the quantum phenomenon of sp00ky action at a distance is proof of house elves.
When you are taught in class about Newtonian gravitation, you do not debate your professor about action at a distance.
Even if the empirical evidence for telepathy is sufficient to warrant its acceptance as a reality, that in itself does not necessitate the view of action at a distance.
«It's spooky,» says Bennett, «but it's not action at a distance.»
He famously called quantum entanglement, which is used in quantum computers, «spooky action at a distance».
This is not impossible, but if there is no a priori objection to action at a distance, then the simplest explanation of telepathy is that the entertaining of a thought by one person can directly affect the experience of another; or, from the other point of view, that one person may prehend directly aspects of the experience of another.
Thus in this concept «action at a distance» is readily explicable, since the point acting and the point «being acted upon» can both share a common component, namely the line they have in common.
provided that physical science maintains its denial of «action at a distance,» the safer guess is that direct objectification is practically negligible except for contiguous occasions; but that this practical negligibility is a characteristic of the present cosmic epoch, without any metaphysical generality.
Einstein referred to the effect as «spooky action at a distance».
Whereas modernity found any action at a distance unacceptable, Whitehead's postmodern view of how the events in the world are interconnected renders evidence of this sort quite plausible.
The denial by physical science of «action at a distance» is a comment about the present cosmic epoch and carries with it no metaphysical generality.