Sentences with phrase «action for judicial review»

In Canada, law professor Daniel Turp attempted to bring an action for judicial review in federal court against the Minister of Foreign Affairs for approving permits to provide light armored vehicles produced by General Dynamics Land Systems Canada to Saudi Arabia.

Notwithstanding any other law, this subsection applies in any action for judicial review of any agency action that is authorized by law.

Not exact matches

It's wonderful that the production team has revived a judicial action that is ultimately heroic, ground - shaking, celebrating the good work of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), its representative lawyers noting that only one out of four hundred cases is even accepted for review, i.e. certiorari.

(d) If any State is dissatisfied with the Secretary's action under subsection (b) or (c) of this section, such State may appeal to the United States district court for the district where the capital of such State is located and judicial review of such action shall be on the record in accordance with the provisions of chapter 7 of title 5, United States Code.

When the Commission issues a decision against a given party, such party has at its disposal the complete system of judicial review provided by EU law, which includes the action for annulment at the General Court and the appeal to the CJEU.

Duncan Lewis have experience in all aspects of judicial review claimant work, including obtaining emergency orders and other interim relief to prevent breaches of human rights, following up judicial reviews with actions for damages in both the County and High Court and successfully pursuing judicial review matters to the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court.

The deputy principal then made an application to the High Court to review this decision, by way of judicial review (a review procedure for decisions / actions of public bodies).

We regularly act in references to the Court of Justice of the European Union, as well as in the UK courts and tribunals when EU law issues arise — for instance in judicial review claims, tax and social security tribunals, employment tribunals and damages actions.

The Federal Court may also direct that applications for judicial review be treated as actions (Federal Courts Act, s. 18.4 (2)-RRB-.

A judicial review is a court action in which a judge reviews the decision of a tribunal or other legal decision - maker for serious errors or unfairness.

The London Criminal Courts Solicitors Association (LCCSA) and Criminal Law Solicitors Association (CLSA) brought a successful judicial review action against consultation process for the new two tier contracts.

Bindmans scooped two awards — Charlotte Haworth Hird won the Inquests / Actions Against State award for her work on a judicial review which led to an inquiry into deaths of 18 - 24 year olds in custody; Mike Schwarz won Criminal Defence Lawyer for his work exposing misconduct by undercover police officers.

First, the demise of the distinction between jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional error of law, along with the eradication in Ridge v Baldwin of the distinction between quasi-judicial and administrative decisions, paved the way for the development of a unified set of principles — of legality, rationality and procedural propriety — of judicial review of administrative action.

In the first action, the Law Society brought a claim seeking judicial review of the decision of the Legal Services Commission (LSC) to seek offers from firms of solicitors and not - for - profit organisations on the basis of the new unified contract.

The case is an application for judicial review, attempting to strike down Ministry of the Environment action that allowed Suncor to increase production (and presumably emissions) from its refinery in Chemical Valley.

In the absence of judicial review, an independent judiciary is still a direct check on government power and holding them accountable for their actions.

(d) actions brought by students involving academic matters may be dismissed even where a student has been successful on a prior application for judicial review.

Congressional action does not substitute for judicial review of the Attorney General's decisions.

Her practice is of an advisory, regulatory litigious nature and has included judicial review, actions for damages before UK courts, the superior courts of Ireland, specialized tribunals, the European Court of Justice and General Court in cases concerning a wide range internal market issues, ranging from public procurement to goods and services, energy, agriculture competition and social and employment law.

Tamara has vast experience of all forms of Property law representing landlords and tenants as well as Lenders in proceedings ranging from standard possession claims to more complex issues of art 8 and unreasonableness, undue influence in mortgage fraud (Ertridge), Judicial Review and reasonableness of action on the part of social housing authorities, co-habitee and family resulting / constructive Trusts, injunctions and applications under s91 of the LPA 1925 to the High Court for orders for sale in mortgage possession proceedings.

Her practice is of an advisory, regulatory litigious nature and has included judicial review, actions for damages before UK courts, the superior courts of Ireland, specialized tribunals, the European Court of Justice and General Court in cases concerning a wide range -LSB-...]

My perspective is that of an experienced SRL who prevailed in the first of a series of court actions and who more recently, having acted for another person in bringing a complaint to the Law Society, challenged the result by filing a judicial review petition in her name.

The Child Poverty Action Group (CPAG) has launched judicial review proceedings over proposals to cut housing benefit for private sector tenants on 1 April 2011.

The European Court and Actions for Annulment: Codebook for Data Set on Actions under Article 230, 1954 - 2006 Alec Stone Sweet and Thomas L. Brunell The data set, which is made accessible here, contains the first 5,143 Art. 230 actions for annulment — applications for the judicial review of the legality of Community acts — filed with the European Court of JActions for Annulment: Codebook for Data Set on Actions under Article 230, 1954 - 2006 Alec Stone Sweet and Thomas L. Brunell The data set, which is made accessible here, contains the first 5,143 Art. 230 actions for annulment — applications for the judicial review of the legality of Community acts — filed with the European Court of JActions under Article 230, 1954 - 2006 Alec Stone Sweet and Thomas L. Brunell The data set, which is made accessible here, contains the first 5,143 Art. 230 actions for annulment — applications for the judicial review of the legality of Community acts — filed with the European Court of Jactions for annulment — applications for the judicial review of the legality of Community acts — filed with the European Court of Justice.

Abstract The standard of review analysis for judicial review of administrative action developed over the course of four decades by the Supreme Court of Canada had two important features.

Described by Chambers & Partners as «A high - profile team deserving of all its praise», our Actions Against the Police, Civil Liberties and Human Rights team specialises in claims for false imprisonment, assault, malicious prosecution, discrimination, deaths in custody, and the judicial review of decisions taken by public authorities.

The Divisional Court, a branch of the Superior Court of Justice, is the principal forum for judicial review of government action and also hears statutory and some civil appeals from a broad range of administrative tribunals in Ontario.

Our litigation lawyers focus on assisting with applications for judicial review of administrative decisions and actions.

Likewise the (non) possibility for individuals to challenge regulations before the CJEU, the right of action (and rule of law) principle can not circumvene the Treaties: the issue is that the CJEU stated that judicial review on CFPS is a matter «within» the sphere of EU Treaties, so that MS (and EU Institutions) can not take action which may impact on them by using «outside» procedures; the rationale is the same used in other cases: if the matter is covered by EU law, absence of a specific rule in EU law does not enable MS (or the Institutions) to act: in the Advice on the Lugano Convention on Jurisdiction, the mere indirect effect of the Convention of the 44/2001 Regulation was considered sufficient to make the matter fall «wholly» within EU competence, thus depriving the MS of the power to act.

One of Australia's most respected legal texts For two decades, this work has both mapped and supported development of the law and practice of judicial review of administrative action throughout..

Indeed, the latter provides a model for the future development of the procedural law of judicial review of administrative action by Canadian courts.

This applies both in judicial review or in damages actions, and it is inevitably of interest for an advocate.

Stanton says she anticipates it will take a while for the judicial council to review the information from the multiple complaints and come to a decision regarding further action.

In investigating an alleged conflict of interest of a member for statements made in Question Period, finding a breach and recommending sanctions, she was acting within the parliamentary privilege over the regulation of members and her actions are not subject to judicial review.

Also, see Section 13 (b), Power to Take Disciplinary Action; Section 19 (c), Appeals from the Decision of the Grievance Committee Related to an Ethics Complaint; Section 42 (c), Appeals from the Decision of Grievance Committee Related to a Request for Arbitration; Section 20 (c) and (d), Initiating an Ethics Hearing; Section 23, Action of the Board of Directors; Sections 24 and 49, Initial Action by Directors; Sections 25 and 50, Preliminary Judicial Determination Prior to Imposition of Discipline; Section 45, Board's Right to Decline Arbitration; Section 47 (c), Manner of Invoking Arbitration; Section 55, Request for Procedural Review by Directors;

Also, see Section 13 (b), Power to Take Disciplinary Action; Section 19 (c), Appeals from the Decision of the Grievance Committee Related to an Ethics Complaint; Section 42 (c), Appeals from the Decision of Grievance Committee Related to a Request for Arbitration; Section 20 (c) and (d), Initiating an Ethics Hearing; Section 23, Action of the Board of Directors; Sections 24 and 49, Initial Action by Directors; Sections 25 and 50, Preliminary Judicial Determination Prior to Imposition of Discipline; Section 45, Board's Right to Decline Arbitration; Section 47 (c), Manner of Invoking Arbitration; Section 55, Request for Procedural Review by Directors; Part Fourteen, State Association Professional Standards Committee, Composition of Hearing Panels and Appellate or Review Panels.