So I move back and forth between fundamental questions of meaning and the problem of responsible
action in a democratic society.
Not exact matches
Even if the justices were able to see on the basis of the French achievement that the political divisions they fear from religious controversy are not inescapable
in today's
democratic society, their own need for consistency as they fashion the developing common law would still prevent them from reversing themselves soon enough to enable the American people to take effective official
action to save nonpublic education.
Fox tells the story from beginning to end: childhood
in the German - American parsonage; nine grades of school followed by three years
in a denominational «college» that was not yet a college and three year's
in Eden Seminary, with graduation at 21; a five - month pastorate due to his father's death; Yale Divinity School, where despite academic probation because he had no accredited degree, he earned the B.D. and M.A.; the Detroit pastorate (1915 - 1918)
in which he encountered industrial America and the race problem; his growing reputation as lecturer and writer (especially for The Christian Century); the teaching career at Union Theological Seminary (1928 - 1960); marriage and family; the landmark books Moral Man and Immoral
Society and The Nature and Destiny of Man; the founding of the Fellowship of Socialist Christians and its journal Radical Religion; the gradual move from Socialist to liberal
Democratic politics, and from leader of the Fellowship of Reconciliation to critic of pacifism; the break with Charles Clayton Morrison's Christian Century and the inauguration of Christianity and Crisis; the founding of the Union for
Democratic Action, then later of Americans for
Democratic Action; participation
in the ecumenical movement, especially the Oxford Conference and the Amsterdam Assembly; increasing friendship with government officials and service with George Kennan's policy - planning group
in the State Department; the first stroke
in 1952 and the subsequent struggles with ill health; retirement from Union
in 1960, followed by short appointments at Harvard, at the Center for the Study of
Democratic Institutions, and at Columbia's Institute of War and Peace Studies; intense suffering from ill health; and death
in Stockbridge, Massachusetts,
in 1971.
Brought to you by: Indivisible The Fight is On Hudson Valley Strong Bard Center for Civic Engagement Bard Democrats Election@Bard Moderators: Karen Scharff and Jasmine Gripper Co-Sponsors (
in alphabetical order): Citizen
Action of Hudson Valley Democracy Matters Dutchess County
Democratic Committee Dutchess County Progressive
Action Alliance Dutchess County Young Democrats HERS (Hudson Valley Empowerment and Research
Society) Hudson Valley Area Labor Federation NY19votes Progressive Turnout Project Strong Economy for All Coalition Working Families Party
Okechukwu, who represents Aninri / Awgu federal constituency of Enugu State, said «these
actions are unacceptable
in a
democratic society.»
Fifteen years ago, our book, Charter Schools
in Action, foresaw this innovative governance and delivery system for education as a hopeful path to stronger student achievement and as an engine «to recreate the
democratic underpinnings of public education and rejoin schools to a vigorous civil
society.»
If we expect students to practice being - and ultimately become - engaged
democratic citizens
in school and
society, we must show them democracy
in action.
It presages a law captured by the rhetoric of the right to freedom of expression without due regard to the value underlying the particular exercise of that right; a law
in which, under the guise of the right to freedom of expression, the «right» to offend can be exercised without responsibility or restraint providing it does not cause a disruption or disturbance
in the nature of public disorder; a law
in which an impoverished amoral concept of «public order» is judicially ordained; a law
in which the right to freedom of expression trumps — or tramples upon — other rights and values which are the vital rights and properties of a free and
democratic society; a law to which any number of vulnerable individuals and minorities may be exposed to uncivil, and even odious, ethnic, sexist, homophobic, anti-Christian, anti-Semitic, and anti-Islamic taunts providing no public disorder results; a law
in which good and decent people can be used as fodder to promote a cause or promote an
action for which they are not responsible and over which they have no direct control; a law which demeans the dignity of the persons adversely affected by those asserting their right to freedom of expression
in a disorderly or offensive manner; a law
in which the mores or standards of
society are set without regard to the reasonable expectations of citizens
in a free and
democratic society; and a law marked by a lack of empathy by the sensibilities, feelings and emotional frailties of people who can be deeply and genuinely affronted by language and behaviour that is beyond the pale
in a civil and civilised
society.