The world's two biggest economies have imposed import tariffs on each other's goods, including Chinese aluminum and U.S. aluminum scrap, and threatened more
action in a trade dispute that has roiled metals markets.
Not exact matches
«Syngenta remains engaged with U.S. government officials to monitor impacts
in renegotiations and
trade -
dispute actions,» Peterson says.
China's
action could be an escalation
in a much broader
trade dispute.
Workers
in Osun who have declared a
trade dispute since December 24 today called off their industrial
action.
The
dispute has not only given rise to proceedings before the WTO (providing more wood for the ongoing fiery debate on the legality of PPM - measures), but has also found its way to Luxembourg
in the form of a number of direct
actions for annulment of EU regulations banning
trade in seal products.
His practice covers a range of litigation, including commercial, class
action defense, product liability, mass tort, environmental,
trade secret, insurance coverage, and real property title
disputes in state and federal courts.
Our lawyers have significant experience
in assisting our clients protect and develop the full value of their intellectual property by prosecuting and defending copyright and trademark infringement cases, unfair competition
actions, Internet and technology
disputes, franchise
disputes, false advertising claims, litigation concerning
trade secrets and restrictive covenants, and other claims relating to intellectual property.
This version is the distillation of the authoritative 11 - volume treatise, Securities Regulation,
in one convenient volume, offering expert analysis of every significant aspect of securities law, including: Primary liability under 10 (b); Insider
trading; Sanctions; Disclosure requirements; Rules and forms for offerings; SEC reporting; Forward - looking statements; Class
action suits; Bespeaks caution cases; ADR
in securities
disputes.
During his 21 - year legal career, Mr. Goldberg has litigated hundreds of cases
in federal and state courts throughout the United States involving claims of retaliation, discrimination, wrongful termination, fraud, defamation, breach of fiduciary duty, and breach of contract, as well as commercial contract
disputes, civil RICO, ERISA,
trade secrets and restrictive covenants, corporate governance
disputes, minority shareholder
disputes, partnership
disputes, Madoff counseling and defense, advancement and indemnification proceedings, whistleblower
actions (SOX and CEPA), executive compensation counseling, litigation, and arbitration, international litigation and arbitration, antitrust litigation and arbitration, products liability litigation, environmental and toxic tort litigation, and securities fraud.
Actions relating to records within the Canadian Intellectual Property Office, such as
disputes over ownership or inventorship of a patent or
trade - mark must be brought
in the Federal Court — s. 20 (1)(a).
Dan's business litigation included defending a truck manufacturer
in suits by disgruntled dealers, the defense of numerous officers and directors of failed savings and loans, a recovery for limited partners
in a franchise who were misled by a franchisor, defense of libel
actions,
trade secret litigation on behalf of both plaintiffs and defendants, lease covenant
disputes for commercial tenants of shopping centers, and business partnership
disputes.
In his litigation and arbitration practice, Eric has represented clients in matters including international - trade disputes, securities class actions, IP litigation, and commercial dispute
In his litigation and arbitration practice, Eric has represented clients
in matters including international - trade disputes, securities class actions, IP litigation, and commercial dispute
in matters including international -
trade disputes, securities class
actions, IP litigation, and commercial
disputes.
He has experience representing clients
in a wide - range of high - stakes litigation, including class
actions, contract claims, business torts, unfair
trade practices,
trade secrets, and other business
disputes.
Mr. Geiger represents business clients
in all types of
disputes, such as product liability (including pharmaceuticals and medical devices), toxic torts, medical and genetics negligence, breach of privacy, other personal injury claims, class
actions, multidistrict litigation, governmental
actions, insurance litigation, breaches of contract, allegations of fraud and unfair
trade practices, commercial warranty
disputes and intellectual property controversies.
Mr. Hensley's litigation experience is broad
in nature, encompassing such diverse practice areas as: real estate issues of almost any nature; construction defect litigation (both plaintiff and defense, representing developers, contractors, managers, subcontractors, and design professionals); federal and state securities class
action / derivative defense; partnership / corporate governance issues; UCC / commercial paper / letter of credit issues; intellectual property /
trade secret / unfair competition issues; wrongful termination / harassment trials; wage / hour class
action defense; contract formation and interpretation issues; bankruptcy adversary proceedings; health care
disputes; telecommunications issues; and debtor / creditor financing issues involving both secured and unsecured interests.
Lamb's recent client successes include securing a dismissal on behalf of the board of a publicly
traded company of three shareholder derivative and class
action complaints
in Ohio and Texas challenging the fairness of a $ 2.5 billion merger transaction and prevailing
in an arbitration involving a
dispute over the proper accounting treatment of certain items
in connection with another client's purchase of a business.
Additionally, recognizing that a cyber - or privacy - related development can expand to encompass a number of other significant legal issues, our group works hand -
in - glove with attorneys
in our White Collar Defense, Regulatory and Investigations, Securities Litigation, Complex Commercial Litigation, Business Finance & Restructuring and Employment Litigation practices, among others, to address subsequent risks such as government or regulatory inquiries, shareholder, consumer, or employee class
action litigation,
trade secrets theft, funding or financial issues, and
disputes with vendors, service providers and other third parties.
Litigation: Our litigators represent hospitality and restaurant clients
in commercial, consumer, employment and class
action lawsuits, including intellectual property and
trade secret
disputes, lease
disputes, contract
disputes, injunctions, vendor
disputes, ADA suits, and construction
disputes.
He also specializes
in cases involving intellectual property,
trade secrets, unfair business competition and employment related claims, and he has substantial experience
in representing financial institutions
in lender liability
actions, interbank
disputes and claims involving directors and officers.
In addition, our employment lawyers also litigate restrictive covenant and
trade secret issues, employment contract
disputes, employment tort
action cases and other statutory causes of
action such as claims asserted under the Family and Medical Leave Act, Fair Labor Standards Act and Whistleblower statutes.
Our attorneys have litigated on behalf of defendants and plaintiffs
in a wide variety of entertainment matters, including
disputes alleging copyright, trademark, and
trade dress infringement; right of publicity violations; idea theft; breaches of licensing and distribution, participation, film financing, and executive employment agreements;
trade secret violations; and a variety of fraud, interference, personal injury, and other tort
actions.
He has represented clients
in a wide variety of commercial
disputes, including claims involving securities fraud, breach of contract, class
actions, partnership
disputes,
trade secrets, common law fraud, and commercial torts.
We have represented both plaintiffs and defendants
in trademark, copyright and patent infringement
actions,
trade secret
disputes, contract breaches and general business litigation clients
in Federal and State Courts across the country, as well as
in the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board and Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Clifford acts
in most types of commercial and insolvency litigation including Pre-emptive remedies, Minority Shareholder
Actions, claims against Directors for breach of duty, claims for Unjust Enrichment or for Breach of Fiduciary duties, Shareholder Disputes, Partnership Disputes, claims under the Commercial Agents Directive, Directors» Disqualifications, actions for Breach of Confidence and Database Rights and proceedings to enforce Restraint of Trade Cov
Actions, claims against Directors for breach of duty, claims for Unjust Enrichment or for Breach of Fiduciary duties, Shareholder
Disputes, Partnership
Disputes, claims under the Commercial Agents Directive, Directors» Disqualifications,
actions for Breach of Confidence and Database Rights and proceedings to enforce Restraint of Trade Cov
actions for Breach of Confidence and Database Rights and proceedings to enforce Restraint of
Trade Covenants.
In addition, he has handled a significant number of
disputes before US administrative agencies, including 337
actions before the US International
Trade Commission and proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeals Board.
He has represented clients
in matters involving partnership
disputes, derivative
actions, breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, theft of
trade secrets and real estate
disputes and transactions.
Bergman has extensive trial experience
in state and federal courts, litigating unfair competition, false advertising, trademark,
trade dress and copyright infringement cases along with class
actions and other complex business
disputes.
Govia Thameslink Railway Ltd v ASLEF [2016] EWHC 1320 QBD, 2 June 2016; [2016] IRLR 686 Interim injunction granted to prevent union from inducing train drivers employed on Southern and Gatwick Express services from taking part
in industrial
action, where GTR was likely to succeed at trial
in showing (i) there had been a prior call by the
trade union to take part
in industrial
action to which the ballot related; and (ii) the ballot had been extended to workplaces ta which there was no union member directly affected by the
dispute.
At Gorodissky & Partners, notable work included representing Russian confectioner Chocolate Toy
in a copyright infringement
dispute; defending Decor Rus against an infringement
action brought by a competitor; and representing Perfetti Van Melle
in a
trade mark infringement case filed by New Technologies regarding its «FOOTBALL» mark.
We have represented clients
in false advertising and unfair competition lawsuits, consumer class
actions,
disputes before the National Advertising Division and proceedings before Federal
Trade Commission, Food and Drug Administration and state Attorneys General.
He has represented clients
in complex litigation, including class and collective
actions, involving employment discrimination, noncompetition agreement and
trade secret issues, wage and hour compliance, employment contract
disputes, and other matters.
Our leading expertise
in dispute resolution and international
trade litigation has also involved litigation against both the federal and provincial governments on matters relating to international
trade regulations, government measures, and
actions and policies that impede access to the Canadian and foreign markets.
He has deep experience handling various types of intellectual property
disputes, including patent infringement
actions in the U.S. District Courts and before the U.S. International
Trade Commission.
This is not just seen
in IP - related litigation, such as
actions for
trade mark infringement, but also
in commercial
disputes.
He is a commercial litigation specialist, who is particularly experienced
in handling complex commercial litigation involving commercial contracts, financial services, fraud, insurance, international
trade, joint - ventures, shareholder and share purchase
disputes and regulatory
actions as well as cross-border
disputes and enforcement
actions in a wide number of jurisdictions.
Nothing
in this section shall be construed so as to make unlawful any
action lawfully taken by a party to a
trade dispute (as defined in the Trade Unions Act
trade dispute (as defined
in the
Trade Unions Act
Trade Unions Act (Cap.
Nathaniel has broad experience representing clients
in complex civil litigation, such as contract
disputes, unfair
trade practices, ERISA violations, and
actions brought under the False Claims Act.