Sentences with phrase «action in the right circumstances»

Not exact matches

It lies in your ability to stop, go inward, and reflect on the course of action that you know is the right one rather than succumbing to external pressures and circumstances.

Under very precise circumstances naming someone a heretic or viper could be appropriate if it actually stirs the people of God in the right direction in thinking and action.

But the qualifier «in such and such circumstances» must be added, for rights and duties are not independent of the context of action.

I concluded at the time of the riots that of all the things the government now needed to do, it was the married family which most urgently needed to be rebuilt: I was and remain as certain of that as anything I have ever written, and I have been saying it repeatedly for over 20 years: I was saying it, for instance, when I was attacking (in The Mail and also The Telegraph), as it went through the Commons, the parliamentary bill which became that disastrous piece of (Tory) legislation called the Children Act 1989, which abolished parental rights (substituting for them the much weaker «parental responsibility»), which encouraged parents not to spend too much time with their children, which even, preposterously, gave children the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smack.»

He suggests that Church teaching is unnecessarily morally objective, that Catholic claims to truth are like the Stalinist propaganda machine, and: «A particular action is right or wrong only in relation to the circumstances in which it is performed.»

Surely if Professor Arkes is right about the «shading and calibration» of Catholic teaching, then stating that my actions are motivated in part by the immediate circumstances should not automatically place me within a proportionalist framework.

Although they typically hold that abortion and terror bombing are «usually,» or even «virtually always,» wrong, they maintain that these actions could be right in circumstances in which performing them would conduce to the net best proportion of good to bad in the world overall and in the long run.

Byrne Dairy Web sites will disclose your personal information, without notice, only if required to do so by law or in the good faith belief that such action is necessary to: (a) conform to the edicts of the law or comply with legal process served on Byrne Dairy or the site; (b) protect and defend the rights or property of Byrne Dairy; and, (c) act under exigent circumstances to protect the personal safety of users of Byrne Dairy, or the public.

We may access and / or disclose your personal information if we believe such action is necessary to: (a) comply with the law or legal process served on Fantasy Labs; (b) protect and defend the rights or property of Fantasy Labs (including the enforcement of our agreements); or (c) act in urgent circumstances to protect the personal safety of users of Fantasy Labs services or members of the public.

Challenge Success websites will disclose your personal information, without notice, only if required to do so by law or in the good faith belief that such action is necessary to: (a) conform to the edicts of the law or comply with legal process served on Challenge Success or the site; (b) protect and defend the rights or property of Challenge Success; and, (c) act under exigent circumstances to protect the personal safety of users of Challenge Success, or the public.

Disclosures Founding Moms will not disclose any of your personal information to third parties without your permission except in the following circumstances: (i) to investigate and defend Founding Moms against any third party claims or allegations or otherwise to protect Founding Moms from liability, (ii) to investigate, prevent or take action regarding suspected or actual illegal activities, (iii) to assist government enforcement agencies, respond to a legal process or comply with the law, (iv) to exercise or protect the rights, property or personal safety of the users of the Service and / or (v) to protect the security or integrity of the Service.

The Speaker stated that the Presiding Officers retained, absolutely and solely, the right to determine admission to the Gallery, and that although he had and would, in normal circumstances, consult with the Gallery Committee, under no circumstances would he take action to prevent any media representative whom he judged to be qualified and competent to report proceedings from coming to the Gallery to report them.121

Nebraska School Nurses Association Web sites will disclose your personal information, without notice, only if required to do so by law or in the good faith belief that such action is necessary to: (a) conform to the edicts of the law or comply with legal process served on Nebraska School Nurses Association or the site; (b) protect and defend the rights or property of Nebraska School Nurses Association; and, (c) act under exigent circumstances to protect the personal safety of users of Nebraska School Nurses Association, or the public.

Cars.com expressly reserves the right to release any personally identifiable information or other information you provide to third parties under the following circumstances: (a) when required by law or legal process, (b) to investigate and / or take action against illegal activity, suspected abuse or unauthorized use of the Site, (c) to protect the property or safety of our users or others, (d) to enforce our Terms of Service and (e) in connection with any sale or other transfer of ownership of all or a part of Cars.com.

We may access and / or disclose your personal information if required to do so by law or in the good faith belief that such action is necessary to: (a) conform to the edicts of the law or comply with legal process served on us; (b) protect and defend our rights or property; or (c) act under exigent circumstances to protect the personal safety of our users or the public.

We will disclose your personal information, without notice, only if required to do so by law or in the good faith belief that such action is necessary to: (a) conform to the edicts of the law or comply with legal process served on Le French Book or the site; (b) protect and defend the rights or property of Le French Book (including enforcing this agreement); and, (c) act under exigent circumstances to protect the personal safety of users of Le French Book, or the public.

And while I think that some of the most egregious - to - retailers (you give up your right to sue or form class action lawsuits; comiXology has the right to use your service marks to promote their digital service; you're obligated to promote the service in - store to existing customers; there are some circumstances where you don't receive even a single penny until you sell well over 600 comics, and so on and so forth) sections of the current could certainly be made less egregious, I think the root core of the problem is that comiXology wants to be the retailer of digital, and not the distributor, and that's what we'll end up calling «irreconcilable differences» at the end of the day.

We may disclose personal information if required to do so by law or in the good - faith belief that such action is necessary to (1) conform to the edicts of the law or comply with legal process served on Company or its parent company, subsidiaries or affiliates, (2) protect and defend the rights or property of Company or the users of the Site, or (3) act under exigent circumstances to protect the safety of the public or users of the Site.

Jacaranda Animal Hospital Web sites will disclose your personal information, without notice, only if required to do so by law or in the good faith belief that such action is necessary to: (a) conform to the edicts of the law or comply with legal process served on Jacaranda Animal Hospital or the site; (b) protect and defend the rights or property of Jacaranda Animal Hospital; and, (c) act under exigent circumstances to protect the personal safety of users of Jacaranda Animal Hospital, or the public.

Ehrlich Animal Hospital & Arthritis Therapy Center Web sites will disclose your personal information, without notice, only if required to do so by law or in the good faith belief that such action is necessary to: (a) conform to the edicts of the law or comply with legal process served on Ehrlich Animal Hospital & Arthritis Therapy Center or the site; (b) protect and defend the rights or property of Ehrlich Animal Hospital & Arthritis Therapy Center; and, (c) act under exigent circumstances to protect the personal safety of users of Ehrlich Animal Hospital & Arthritis Therapy Center, or the public.

Gateway Miniature Schnauzer Club Web sites will disclose your personal information, without notice, only if required to do so by law or in the good faith belief that such action is necessary to: (a) conform to the edicts of the law or comply with legal process served on Gateway Miniature Schnauzer Club or the site; (b) protect and defend the rights or property of Gateway Miniature Schnauzer Club; and, (c) act under exigent circumstances to protect the personal safety of users of Gateway Miniature Schnauzer Club, or the public.

Fear Free will disclose your personal information, without notice, only if required to do so by law or in the good faith belief that such action is necessary to: (a) conform to the edicts of the law or comply with legal process served on Fear Free or the site; (b) protect and defend the rights or property of Fear Free; and, (c) act under exigent circumstances to protect the personal safety of users of Fear Free, or the public.

In addition, Telegraph Cove Resort reserves the right to disclose your personally identifiable information based on the good faith belief that such action is necessary or appropriate to: (a) protect and defend the rights or property of Telegraph Cove Resort, or (b) act in urgent circumstances to protect the safety or security of the public or of users of the Telegraph Cove Resort's services and / or the websitIn addition, Telegraph Cove Resort reserves the right to disclose your personally identifiable information based on the good faith belief that such action is necessary or appropriate to: (a) protect and defend the rights or property of Telegraph Cove Resort, or (b) act in urgent circumstances to protect the safety or security of the public or of users of the Telegraph Cove Resort's services and / or the websitin urgent circumstances to protect the safety or security of the public or of users of the Telegraph Cove Resort's services and / or the website.

13.4 If the the World Photography Organisation is in breach of any of its obligations under these Terms and Conditions or the Rules or under statute or common law, Your rights and remedies will be limited to the right (if any) to recover damages in an action at law and in no circumstances will You be entitled by reason of any such breach to enjoin or restrain the distribution, exhibition, broadcasting, advertising or exploitation of any photographs or any Entry

Lucky Street Gallery will disclose your personal information, without notice, only if required to do so by law or in the good faith belief that such action is necessary to: (a) conform to the edicts of the law or comply with legal process served on Lucky Street Gallery or the site; (b) protect and defend the rights or property of Lucky Street Gallery; and, (c) act under exigent circumstances to protect the personal safety of users of Lucky Street Gallery, or the public.

Stoller Family Estate Web sites will disclose your personal information, without notice, only if required to do so by law or in the good faith belief that such action is necessary to: (a) conform to the edicts of the law or comply with legal process served on Stoller Family Estate or the site; (b) protect and defend the rights or property of Stoller Family Estate; and, (c) act under exigent circumstances to protect the personal safety of users of Stoller Family Estate, or the public.

However, under most circumstances you maintain the right to seek compensation through legal action even in cases where a helmet was not worn.

In those instances, civil courts have the ability to stay an action pending resolution of the criminal matter in «exceptional or extraordinary circumstances where there is a real risk that the right to a fair criminal trial will be seriously prejudiced by the continuation of the civil case.&raquIn those instances, civil courts have the ability to stay an action pending resolution of the criminal matter in «exceptional or extraordinary circumstances where there is a real risk that the right to a fair criminal trial will be seriously prejudiced by the continuation of the civil case.&raquin «exceptional or extraordinary circumstances where there is a real risk that the right to a fair criminal trial will be seriously prejudiced by the continuation of the civil case.»

At common law, what was expected in these circumstances was that the attorney general would institute proceedings to uphold public rights and duties either acting ex officio or through a «relator action», ie one in which the attorney general proceeded to assert a public right on the relation of a private person or a corporation.

Is this right or wrong given the unique circumstances in this case?Should the evaluations of the actions for accuracy and logical consistency, to the same issue, be protected under Free Speech?

But if someone was led into committing a crime in such circumstances, an action for breach of copyright does not seem like the right remedy — and the inadvertent criminal could not assert it anyway.

The Indemnified Party shall have the right to employ separate counsel in any such action and to participate in the defense thereof, but the fees and expenses of such counsel shall not be at the expense of the Indemnifying Party if the Indemnifying Party has assumed the defense of the action with counsel reasonably satisfactory to the Indemnified Party; provided that the fees and expenses of such counsel shall be at the expense of the Indemnifying Party if (i) the employment of such counsel has been specifically authorized in writing by the Indemnifying Party or (ii) the named parties to any such action (including any impleaded parties) include both the Indemnified Party or parties and the Indemnifying Party and, in the judgement of counsel for the Indemnified Party, it is advisable for the Indemnified Party or parties to be represented by separate counsel (in which case the Indemnifying Party shall not have the right to assume the defense of such action on behalf of the Indemnified Party or parties, it being understood, however, that the Indemnifying Party shall not, in connection with any one such action or separate but substantially similar or related actions in the same jurisdiction arising out of the same general allegations or circumstances, be liable for the reasonable fees and expenses of more than one separate firm of attorneys for the Indemnified Party or parties.

California Injury Attorneys web sites will disclose your personal information, without notice, only if required to do so by law or in the good faith belief that such action is necessary to: (a) conform to the law or comply with legal process served on California Injury Attorneys or the site; (b) protect and defend the rights or property of California Injury Attorneys; and, (c) act under exigent circumstances to protect the personal safety of users of California Injury Attorneys, or the public.

Although in the past trial by jury was typical in defamation actions, the right to jury trial has recently been abolished in this context, and trial will now be by judge save in exceptional circumstances.

That, as aboriginal peoples, Métis and non-status Indians have the same right to consultation and negotiation in circumstances where government actions may impact their aboriginal and treaty rights.

«(iii) Where (and only where) there is a reasonable belief that there are no other means whatsoever whereby a breach of the peace or imminent breach of the peace can be obviated, the lawful exercise by third parties of their rights may be curtailed by the police; (iv) this is a test of necessity which it is to be expected can only be justified in truly extreme and exceptional circumstances; and (v) the action taken must be both reasonably necessary and proportionate.»

The circumstances of Gionni's birth — drastically different than women who are not incarcerated — brings to mind various causes of action in tort and under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms against OCDC.

Generally speaking a party to an action has the right to attend the entire trial or the examinations for discovery of other parties to the action and exclusion of a party is an uncommon event, but appropriate in some circumstances.

There is no fee to file an RFA however rights holders are liable for costs related to storage, handling and destruction of any detained goods in specified circumstances, and must begin a civl action within 10 days of any notice of detention (extendable by 10 days) or the goods will be released.

If an application overcomes the hurdles in CA 2006, s 263 (2) the court will then take into account the discretionary factors set out in s 263 (3) which states: «(3) In considering whether to give permission (or leave) the court must take into account, in particular --(a) whether the member is acting in good faith in seeking to continue the claim; (b) the importance that a person acting in accordance with section 172 (duty to promote the success of the company) would attach to continuing it; (c) where the cause of action results from an act or omission that is yet to occur, whether the act or omission could be, and in the circumstances would be likely to be --(i) authorised by the company before it occurs, or (ii) ratified by the company after it occurs; (d) where the cause of action arises from an act or omission that has already occurred, whether the act or omission could be, and in the circumstances would be likely to be, ratified by the company; (e) whether the company has decided not to pursue the claim; (f) whether the act or omission in respect of which the claim is brought gives rise to a cause of action that the member could pursue in his own right rather than on behalf of the company.&raquin CA 2006, s 263 (2) the court will then take into account the discretionary factors set out in s 263 (3) which states: «(3) In considering whether to give permission (or leave) the court must take into account, in particular --(a) whether the member is acting in good faith in seeking to continue the claim; (b) the importance that a person acting in accordance with section 172 (duty to promote the success of the company) would attach to continuing it; (c) where the cause of action results from an act or omission that is yet to occur, whether the act or omission could be, and in the circumstances would be likely to be --(i) authorised by the company before it occurs, or (ii) ratified by the company after it occurs; (d) where the cause of action arises from an act or omission that has already occurred, whether the act or omission could be, and in the circumstances would be likely to be, ratified by the company; (e) whether the company has decided not to pursue the claim; (f) whether the act or omission in respect of which the claim is brought gives rise to a cause of action that the member could pursue in his own right rather than on behalf of the company.&raquin s 263 (3) which states: «(3) In considering whether to give permission (or leave) the court must take into account, in particular --(a) whether the member is acting in good faith in seeking to continue the claim; (b) the importance that a person acting in accordance with section 172 (duty to promote the success of the company) would attach to continuing it; (c) where the cause of action results from an act or omission that is yet to occur, whether the act or omission could be, and in the circumstances would be likely to be --(i) authorised by the company before it occurs, or (ii) ratified by the company after it occurs; (d) where the cause of action arises from an act or omission that has already occurred, whether the act or omission could be, and in the circumstances would be likely to be, ratified by the company; (e) whether the company has decided not to pursue the claim; (f) whether the act or omission in respect of which the claim is brought gives rise to a cause of action that the member could pursue in his own right rather than on behalf of the company.&raquIn considering whether to give permission (or leave) the court must take into account, in particular --(a) whether the member is acting in good faith in seeking to continue the claim; (b) the importance that a person acting in accordance with section 172 (duty to promote the success of the company) would attach to continuing it; (c) where the cause of action results from an act or omission that is yet to occur, whether the act or omission could be, and in the circumstances would be likely to be --(i) authorised by the company before it occurs, or (ii) ratified by the company after it occurs; (d) where the cause of action arises from an act or omission that has already occurred, whether the act or omission could be, and in the circumstances would be likely to be, ratified by the company; (e) whether the company has decided not to pursue the claim; (f) whether the act or omission in respect of which the claim is brought gives rise to a cause of action that the member could pursue in his own right rather than on behalf of the company.&raquin particular --(a) whether the member is acting in good faith in seeking to continue the claim; (b) the importance that a person acting in accordance with section 172 (duty to promote the success of the company) would attach to continuing it; (c) where the cause of action results from an act or omission that is yet to occur, whether the act or omission could be, and in the circumstances would be likely to be --(i) authorised by the company before it occurs, or (ii) ratified by the company after it occurs; (d) where the cause of action arises from an act or omission that has already occurred, whether the act or omission could be, and in the circumstances would be likely to be, ratified by the company; (e) whether the company has decided not to pursue the claim; (f) whether the act or omission in respect of which the claim is brought gives rise to a cause of action that the member could pursue in his own right rather than on behalf of the company.&raquin good faith in seeking to continue the claim; (b) the importance that a person acting in accordance with section 172 (duty to promote the success of the company) would attach to continuing it; (c) where the cause of action results from an act or omission that is yet to occur, whether the act or omission could be, and in the circumstances would be likely to be --(i) authorised by the company before it occurs, or (ii) ratified by the company after it occurs; (d) where the cause of action arises from an act or omission that has already occurred, whether the act or omission could be, and in the circumstances would be likely to be, ratified by the company; (e) whether the company has decided not to pursue the claim; (f) whether the act or omission in respect of which the claim is brought gives rise to a cause of action that the member could pursue in his own right rather than on behalf of the company.&raquin seeking to continue the claim; (b) the importance that a person acting in accordance with section 172 (duty to promote the success of the company) would attach to continuing it; (c) where the cause of action results from an act or omission that is yet to occur, whether the act or omission could be, and in the circumstances would be likely to be --(i) authorised by the company before it occurs, or (ii) ratified by the company after it occurs; (d) where the cause of action arises from an act or omission that has already occurred, whether the act or omission could be, and in the circumstances would be likely to be, ratified by the company; (e) whether the company has decided not to pursue the claim; (f) whether the act or omission in respect of which the claim is brought gives rise to a cause of action that the member could pursue in his own right rather than on behalf of the company.&raquin accordance with section 172 (duty to promote the success of the company) would attach to continuing it; (c) where the cause of action results from an act or omission that is yet to occur, whether the act or omission could be, and in the circumstances would be likely to be --(i) authorised by the company before it occurs, or (ii) ratified by the company after it occurs; (d) where the cause of action arises from an act or omission that has already occurred, whether the act or omission could be, and in the circumstances would be likely to be, ratified by the company; (e) whether the company has decided not to pursue the claim; (f) whether the act or omission in respect of which the claim is brought gives rise to a cause of action that the member could pursue in his own right rather than on behalf of the company.&raquin the circumstances would be likely to be --(i) authorised by the company before it occurs, or (ii) ratified by the company after it occurs; (d) where the cause of action arises from an act or omission that has already occurred, whether the act or omission could be, and in the circumstances would be likely to be, ratified by the company; (e) whether the company has decided not to pursue the claim; (f) whether the act or omission in respect of which the claim is brought gives rise to a cause of action that the member could pursue in his own right rather than on behalf of the company.&raquin the circumstances would be likely to be, ratified by the company; (e) whether the company has decided not to pursue the claim; (f) whether the act or omission in respect of which the claim is brought gives rise to a cause of action that the member could pursue in his own right rather than on behalf of the company.&raquin respect of which the claim is brought gives rise to a cause of action that the member could pursue in his own right rather than on behalf of the company.&raquin his own right rather than on behalf of the company.»

Disputes and Governing Law: Except where prohibited, entrant agrees that: (1) any and all disputes, claims and causes of action arising out of or connected with this Contest or any prize awarded shall be resolved individually, without resort to any form of class action, and exclusively by a federal or state court located in the province of Alberta any and all claims, judgments and awards shall be limited to actual out - of - pocket costs incurred, including costs associated with entering this Contest, but in no event attorneys» fees; and (3) under no circumstances will entrant be permitted to obtain awards for, and entrant hereby waives all rights to claim, indirect, punitive, incidental and consequential damages and any other damages, other than for actual out - of - pocket expenses, and any and all rights to have damages multiplied or otherwise increased.

SimplyInsured may disclose personal information if required to do so by law or in the good faith belief that such action is necessary to: (1) conform to the edicts of the law, comply with legal process served on SimplyInsured, or take precautions against liability; (2) protect SimplyInsured and others from fraudulent, abusive, predatory, or unlawful uses or activity; (3) investigate and defend SimplyInsured against any third party claims or allegations; (4) protect and defend the rights or property of SimplyInsured; or (5) act in urgent circumstances to protect the personal safety of users of SimplyInsured, the Service, or the public.

Arcade Drivers School and Sears Driving School may disclose your personal information if required to do so by law or in the good - faith belief that such action is necessary to: (a) conform to the edicts of the law or comply with legal process served on Arcade Drivers School and Sears Driving School or our Website (s); (b) protect and defend the rights or property of Arcade Drivers School and Sears Driving School and its Website (s), or (c) act in urgent circumstances to protect the personal safety of Arcade Drivers School and Sears Driving School employees, users of Arcade Drivers School and Sears Driving School services, or members of the public.

Mary Jeanne Vincent, Career Expert + Strategist will disclose your personal information, without notice, only if required to do so by law or in the good - faith belief that such action is necessary to: (a) conform to the edicts of the law or comply with legal process served on Mary Jeanne Vincent, Career Expert + Strategist or the site; (b) protect and defend the rights or property of Mary Jeanne Vincent, Career Expert + Strategist; and, (c) act under exigent circumstances to protect the personal safety of users of Mary Jeanne Vincent, Career Expert + Strategist, or the public.

Inspire Careers Inc Outplacement, Career Coaching and Career Consulting Web sites will disclose your personal information, without notice, only if required to do so by law or in the good faith belief that such action is necessary to: (a) conform to the edicts of the law or comply with legal process served on Inspire Careers Inc Outplacement, Career Coaching and Career Consulting or the site; (b) protect and defend the rights or property of Inspire Careers Inc Outplacement, Career Coaching and Career Consulting; and, (c) act under exigent circumstances to protect the personal safety of users of Inspire Careers Inc Outplacement, Career Coaching and Career Consulting, or the public.