First, he said that there is no cause of
action under federal law.
«I'm glad the New York City Council is setting aside funds for what are in some ways the most disadvantaged among those eligible for deferred
action under the federal law,» Yoshikawa said.
Not exact matches
The class
action, filed in United States District Court, Southern District of New York, and docketed
under 18 - cv - 02213, is on behalf of a class consisting of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired BRF American Depositary Receipts («ADRs») between April 4, 2013 and March 2, 2018, both dates inclusive (the «Class Period»), seeking to recover damages caused by Defendants» violations of the
federal securities
laws and to pursue remedies
under Sections 10 (b) and 20 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the «Exchange Act») and Rule 10b - 5 promulgated thereunder, against the Company and certain of its top officials.
The class
action, filed in United States District Court, for the District of Illinois, Eastern Division, is on behalf of a class consisting of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Akorn's securities between March 1, 2017 through February 26, 2018, both dates inclusive (the «Class Period»), seeking to recover damages caused by defendants» violations of the
federal securities
laws and to pursue remedies
under Sections 10 (b) and 20 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b - 5 promulgated thereunder, against the Company and certain of its top officials.
Taking a page from
laws creating sanctuary cities for illegal immigrants, a group of lawmakers have submitted a bill that bans California
law enforcement from working with
federal authorities if they attempt to take
action against marijuana grow facilities or dispensaries that operate legally
under state
law.
The Once Upon A Child ®, Play It Again Sports ®, Music Go Round ®, Plato's Closet ® and Style Encore ® trademarks and logos utilized in this website are owned by Winmark Corporation and any unauthorized use of these trademarks by others is subject to
action under federal and state trademark
laws.
You will want to discuss all of your options with your attorney or tax advisor before taking
action, especially if creditor protection is a concern for you, as the Supreme Court has ruled that Inherited IRAs are not protected
under federal bankruptcy
laws (although state
law creditor protection of inherited IRAs still varies).
The Freedom From Religion Foundation sent a letter threatening legal
action because it considers the discount illegal
under federal civil rights
laws.
«A restaurant or similar retail food establishment shall not be liable in any civil
action in
Federal or State court (other than an
action brought by the United States or a State) for any claims arising out of an alleged violation of this clause or any State
law permitted
under section 403A (a)(4).»
The court found that the plaintiff had a private right of
action under Illinois state
law and the identical
federal law did not apply to preempt the state
law claim.
In the event you fail to pay for the access granted (if applicable), and / or share the access granted with any person or entity, or misuse the Service by any means actionable
under a
federal, state, or local statute, code, regulation,
law, and / or civil
action, we will consider your access as having been acquired by fraud or misrepresentation and will terminate your access.
The Once Upon A Child ®, Play It Again Sports ®, Music Go Round ®, Plato's Closet ® and Style Encore ® trademarks and logos utilized in this website are owned by Winmark Corporation and any unauthorized use of these trademarks by others is subject to
action under federal and state trademark
laws.
Any unauthorized use of this trademark by others is subject to
action under federal and state trademark
laws.
«This latest
action by EFCC has confirmed rumours making the rounds that the
federal government wants to give the former Minister of Aviation the Dasuki / Naamdi Kanu treatment, a treatment alien to our
laws but is fast becoming the norm
under the current administration.
With two states affected, either Cuomo or New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie had the power
under federal law to kill the proposal if they took
action by Dec. 21.
A 2007 article in the Administrative
Law Review noted how some federal agencies» usage of signing statements may not withstand legal challenges under common law standards of judicial deference to agency acti
Law Review noted how some
federal agencies» usage of signing statements may not withstand legal challenges
under common
law standards of judicial deference to agency acti
law standards of judicial deference to agency
action.
Prosecutors said the Boyland ruling, which held that
under a different
federal law a wider variety of
actions was sufficient for conviction, strengthened their hand.
But in her motion challenging the EFCC's ex parte application, Mrs. Jonathan, through her lawyers, argued that the EFCC's «Ex parte Originating Summons» was not one of the modes of commencement of
action under Order 3, Rule 1 of the
Federal High Court (Civil Procedure Rules) 2009, and that it was not known or provided for by any
law or rules of court.
A typical ad from the group praising a piece of legislation, for instance, does not count as lobbying
under federal law because it does not specifically call viewers to
action.
Additionally, a recent Supreme Court ruling determined that professional licensing boards (e.g. Dietetics boards and their members) are now liable
under federal law, and may be prosecuted and sued for civil damages for anti-competitive
actions.
One proposal comes from the Education Trust, which has a 17 - year track record of commitment to school reform.The Ed Trust proposes that parents of children in Title I schools, those that have a disadvantaged population and are the main recipients of
federal funds, be vested with a private right of
action «to enforce their rights
under the
law.»
• School Expansion, Growth & Strategic Planning • State and
Federal Employment
Law • School Board and Nonprofit Governance • Administrative
Law & Appeals of State and
Federal Agency Decisions and
Actions • Special Investigations & Legal / Compliance Audits • Policy Guidance and Development • Constitutional Challenges and Claims • School Employee and School Board Training • Litigation in
Federal and State Courts • Administrative Hearings and Appeals Before State and
Federal Agencies • Public Entity Purchasing and Procurement; Business Transactions; & Contract Negotiation, Review and Drafting • Construction
Law, AIA Construction Contracts, Review and Drafting • Real Estate Transactions and Condemnation • Special Education
under IDEA and Section 504 • Student Rights & Discipline Issues and Hearings • State and
Federal Claims of Discrimination • State and
Federal Civil Rights • Administrative Grievances and Hearings • False Claims Act / Qui Tam Defense for Local Government Entities
What each and every one of them forgets is that their
actions constitute a criminal act
under US
Federal and State
law.
Under federal law, you're entitled to a free credit report if a company takes adverse
action against you, such as denying your application for credit, insurance, or employment, and you ask for your credit report within 60 days of receiving notice of the
action.
The enforcement
actions complement the
actions under consideration by the
federal and state regulatory and
law enforcement agencies, and do not preclude those agencies from taking additional enforcement
action.
Under federal law, if the employer uses information from the consumer report for an «adverse
action» - that is, denying the job applicant, terminating the employee, rescinding a job offer, or denying a promotion - it must take the following steps:
A:
Under federal law, you're entitled to a free report if a company takes adverse
action against you, such as denying your application for credit, insurance, or employment, and you ask for your report within 60 days of receiving notice of the
action.
Federal law also outlines that credit card issuers are not allowed to take any legal
actions or try to collect the questioned amount while the dispute is
under investigation.
take any other
action, including, but not limited to,
action permitted pursuant to Section 12, provided for in this Agreement or permitted
under state or
federal law.
The Humane Society of the United States asks the
Federal Trade Commission to bring enforcement action under federal consumer protection laws against 17 retailers for false advertising of fur ga
Federal Trade Commission to bring enforcement
action under federal consumer protection laws against 17 retailers for false advertising of fur ga
federal consumer protection
laws against 17 retailers for false advertising of fur garments.
President Bush and members of his administration have criticized environmentalists» moves
under the endangered species
law and other statutes to force
federal action on climate change.
Therefore, the failure of
law societies to take
action against a problem the size and duration of unaffordable legal services, justifies government intervention
under the
federal government's «trade and commerce» power of s. 91 of The Constitution Act, 1867.
Representing clients in multiple putative class
action litigations including: claims
under the Massachusetts independent contractor
law; claims that employees were not paid for meal and rest breaks; and claimed violations of the state and
federal tip credit statutes
Laura McNally defends clients in class and individual
actions brought
under federal securities
law, challenges to mergers and acquisitions, derivative suits, and appraisals.
Successfully represented private insurance brokerage agency in defense of a wage and hour
action brought by a broker
under federal and state
law.
The bill also clarifies that
actions taken by an employer that are required to comply with
federal I - 9 verification requirements
under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) do not violate California
law.
The Commissioner is an advocate for the privacy rights of Canadians and her powers include: Investigating complaints, conducting audits and pursuing court
action under two
federal laws - Privacy Act and Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA); Publicly reporting on the personal information - handling practices of public and private sector organizations; Supporting, undertaking and publishing research into privacy issues; and Promoting public awareness and understanding of privacy issues.
His environmental and tort litigation experience includes dozens of products liability
actions in California State and
Federal District Courts and multi-district litigation proceedings in the Southern District of New York that arise out of MTBE contamination of drinking water aquifers, as well as actions brought under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act («CERCLA»), the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act («RCRA»), California Proposition 65, the Clean Air Act, and various state and federal criminal laws, environmental laws, or tort doc
Federal District Courts and multi-district litigation proceedings in the Southern District of New York that arise out of MTBE contamination of drinking water aquifers, as well as
actions brought
under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act («CERCLA»), the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act («RCRA»), California Proposition 65, the Clean Air Act, and various state and
federal criminal laws, environmental laws, or tort doc
federal criminal
laws, environmental
laws, or tort doctrines.
How, exactly, do you explain the idea of «deprivation of civil rights
under color of
law» (a
federal crime and a cause of
action in
federal courts) if only lawful
actions are
under color of
law?
It argued that the can not enforce
federal law and such an
action is at the discretion of the congress
under the Supremacy clause.
Among other areas, our litigation experience in the environmental area includes governmental and private - party
actions under CERCLA (including serving as lead counsel for PRP groups at major Superfund sites throughout the United States), citizen suits
under RCRA, the Clean Water Act and other environmental
laws, claims for property damage and personal injury arising from industrial emissions or environmental contamination, and defending clients against state and
federal governmental enforcement
actions.
In Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates v. Allstate Insurance Company, the Supreme Court held that a New York
law placing limits on class
actions did not preclude a
federal district court sitting in diversity from entertaining a class
action under Rule 23.
Doug has also defended many cases challenging state
law or state governmental
action under the state and
federal constitutions.
With extensive experience in state and
federal courts, before administrative agencies, and in arbitrations, Bran defends single and multi-plaintiff claims, as well as class and collective
actions,
under the FLSA, ADA, Title VII, FMLA, ADEA, NLRA, and New York Human Rights and Labor
Laws.
We have substantial experience in representing employers in lawsuits filed by these agencies, and we have successfully defended clients in individual and class
action lawsuits and class
actions brought
under federal and state discrimination
laws.
We also represent industry clients in toxic tort
actions, citizens suits and government agency enforcement
actions arising
under local, state and
federal laws.
How Insight Predict's Unique Capabilities Cut Review by Two Thirds In a major shareholder class
action alleging violations of
federal securities
laws, the defendant's legal team was
under a tight deadline to review a collection of mixed English and Spanish documents.
How Insight Predict's Unique Capabilities Cut Review by Two Thirds In a major shareholder class
action alleging violations of
federal securities
laws, the defendant's legal team was
under a tight deadline... >>
Brad defends clients in class
actions under the
federal securities
laws, various
federal and state consumer protection
laws, including the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), the Fair and Accurate Credit Transaction Act (FACTA) and many state false advertising statutes.
We represent businesses in toxic tort and common
law actions, white collar crimes, CEQA
actions, Proposition 65
actions, CERCLA and state Superfund cost recovery and contribution
actions, as well as government agency enforcement
actions arising
under CERCLA, RCRA, CWA, CAA, and other
federal, state, regional and local
laws.