(The suits are referred to as a mass action because they involve multiple suits that raise similar claims, but they don't seek to be certified as a class
action under the federal rules of civil procedure.)
Not exact matches
The class
action, filed in United States District Court, Southern District of New York, and docketed
under 18 - cv - 02213, is on behalf of a class consisting of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired BRF American Depositary Receipts («ADRs») between April 4, 2013 and March 2, 2018, both dates inclusive (the «Class Period»), seeking to recover damages caused by Defendants» violations of the
federal securities laws and to pursue remedies
under Sections 10 (b) and 20 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the «Exchange Act») and
Rule 10b - 5 promulgated thereunder, against the Company and certain of its top officials.
The class
action, filed in United States District Court, for the District of Illinois, Eastern Division, is on behalf of a class consisting of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Akorn's securities between March 1, 2017 through February 26, 2018, both dates inclusive (the «Class Period»), seeking to recover damages caused by defendants» violations of the
federal securities laws and to pursue remedies
under Sections 10 (b) and 20 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
Rule 10b - 5 promulgated thereunder, against the Company and certain of its top officials.
You will want to discuss all of your options with your attorney or tax advisor before taking
action, especially if creditor protection is a concern for you, as the Supreme Court has
ruled that Inherited IRAs are not protected
under federal bankruptcy laws (although state law creditor protection of inherited IRAs still varies).
At that session, Northern People's Congress (NPC), with National Council of Nigeria and the Cameroon (NCNC) partisans pushed for a
federal take - over of the West,
under the
ruling Action Group (AG).
By deciding to sue the
Federal Communications Commission to protect «net neutrality»
rules established
under Obama in 2015, his office took its 100th
action against the Trump administration and Republicans in Congress.
Prosecutors said the Boyland
ruling, which held that
under a different
federal law a wider variety of
actions was sufficient for conviction, strengthened their hand.
But in her motion challenging the EFCC's ex parte application, Mrs. Jonathan, through her lawyers, argued that the EFCC's «Ex parte Originating Summons» was not one of the modes of commencement of
action under Order 3,
Rule 1 of the
Federal High Court (Civil Procedure
Rules) 2009, and that it was not known or provided for by any law or rules of c
Rules) 2009, and that it was not known or provided for by any law or
rules of c
rules of court.
Additionally, a recent Supreme Court
ruling determined that professional licensing boards (e.g. Dietetics boards and their members) are now liable
under federal law, and may be prosecuted and sued for civil damages for anti-competitive
actions.
Adoption of these
rules is a nondiscretionary, ministerial
action that FMCSA may take without issuing a notice of proposed rulemaking and receiving public comment, in accordance with the good cause exception available to
Federal agencies
under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).
Without limiting your right to file arbitration claims against Capital One Investing
under FINRA
Rule 12200 or its affiliates or successors, you consent to the personal jurisdiction and venue of the
federal and state courts in King County, Washington for any court
action or proceeding relating to your Account and you agree that all such claims by you against us or our affiliates or successors will be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction and venue of the
federal and state courts in King County, State of Washington.
In the recent decision of Dennis v Canada, the
Federal Court upheld the principle of the «no - costs» approach for plaintiffs who wish to discontinue an
action under Rule 334.39 (1) of the
Federal Court
Rules (the «
Rules»).
Canadian Class
Actions Monitor
Federal Court confirms no cost awards granted against Plaintiffs for discontinuance of class proceedings
under Rule 334.39 (1)
In response to the policy argument against allowing relitigation of class certification, the Court noted that stare decisis and comity are the legal system's remedies for repetitive litigation that falls outside of the
rules of preclusion, and that once a class
action is removed to federal court under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA), 28 U.
action is removed to
federal court
under the Class
Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA), 28 U.
Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA), 28 U.S.C.??
In Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates v. Allstate Insurance Company, the Supreme Court held that a New York law placing limits on class
actions did not preclude a
federal district court sitting in diversity from entertaining a class
action under Rule 23.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the
Federal Circuit recently
ruled that a plaintiff not named as a joint inventor on several patents and pending patent applications has standing to maintain an
action to correct inventorship
under 35 U.S.C. § 256, despite the fact that he previously assigned all rights...
Lead counsel for investor in a toy company sued in
federal court in a class
action securities fraud
action under Rule 10b - 5 for alleged insider trading
Defended national bank and its directors in class
action securities fraud case
under Rule 10b - 5 in
federal court
The article discusses the decision in Riverside Church v. City of St. Michael, where a
federal court in Minnesota
ruled that
actions taken
under RLUIPA's safe harbor provision absolved a local government of possible RLUIPA violations.
I. Whether differences among individual class members may be ignored and a class
action certified
under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 (b)(3), or a collective
action certified
under the Fair Labor Standards Act, where liability and damages will be determined with statistical techniques that presume all class members are identical to the average observed in a sample; and
We also have significant experience in administrative and other regulatory litigation, including agency
rule challenges, regulatory investigations
under state and
federal false claims acts and unfair trade practice statutes, and defending clients in related individual and class
action civil suits.