We must wonder whether U.S. Education Secretary Betsy DeVos is choosing to remain ignorant to the potential consequences of
her actions against public schools, or if she understands the damage she is doing and is refusing to acknowledge it.
Not exact matches
For instance a US Education department report concerning American
public schools shows large scale contemporary abuse, with little
action being taken
against admitted offenders.
Despite mea culpas and the
public backing of his boss, Education Secretary Arne Duncan, Kevin Jennings, a so - called
schools czar in the Obama administration, continues to be the target of a conservative campaign
against his long - ago
actions as a schoolteachers.
A class -
action lawsuit is being brought by nearly 200 East Ramapo
public school parents
against the Board of Education for repeatedly misusing
public funds.
Groups like Citizen
Action and the Alliance for Quality Education have long been fighting
against tests used to determine if teachers and
schools are effective and are fighting the push by members of the current
school board for more charter
schools and potentially conversion of some
public schools into charters.
CMSA is perhaps best known for having fired a pregnant teacher in 2010 who was involved in organizing a union at the
school, then defending itself
against a labor relations board
action by claiming it was a private, not a
public school.
Commonly known as the «Anti-Affirmative
Action Proposition,» among other things, it prohibited ``... the state, local governments, districts,
public universities, colleges, and
schools, and other government instrumentalities from discriminating
against or giving preferential treatment to any individual or group in
public employment,
public education, or
public contracting on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin.»
During the 2012 - 2013
public school year,
actions against high - stakes tests included a successful teachers strike in Chicago, an effective boycott in Seattle, student walkouts in Denver and Portland, demonstrations in Providence and opt - out movements in dozens of communities.
The process, and persistent charter claims of being short - changed, has spurred court battles, acrimonious policy debates in the state legislature and even suggestions of a massive, class -
action lawsuit
against traditional
public schools.
Broward
school officials will wait for the investigation to be completed before deciding whether to take any disciplinary
action against a Stoneman Douglas teacher who left his gun in a
public restroom.
You hereby indemnify to the fullest extent DC Bilingual
Public Charter
School from and
against any and / or all liabilities, costs, demands, causes of
action, damages and expenses arising in any way related to your breach of any of the provisions of these Terms.
While such a comment would get any other
public school administrator, teacher or student arrested, fired or suspended, neither the Hartford superintendent of
schools nor the Hartford Board of Education took any disciplinary
action against Perry for his
actions.
For instance, Bradley notes, «WILL has represented
School Choice Wisconsin in various
actions against the Department of
Public Instruction,» (WILL, GPR, 11/10/15).
Please join Milwaukee
Public Schools leadership and PPS - MKE to learn more about the contents of the MPS Takeover proposal and what we can all be doing to inform our community at large and how we can continue to build momentum to push back
against this egregious
action.
(a) Whenever the Attorney General receives a complaint in writing signed by an individual to the effect that he is being deprived of or threatened with the loss of his right to the equal protection of the laws, on account of his race, color, religion, or national origin, by being denied equal utilization of any
public facility which is owned, operated, or managed by or on behalf of any State or subdivision thereof, other than a
public school or
public college as defined in section 401 of title IV hereof, and the Attorney General believes the complaint is meritorious and certifies that the signer or signers of such complaint are unable, in his judgment, to initiate and maintain appropriate legal proceedings for relief and that the institution of an
action will materially further the orderly progress of desegregation in
public facilities, the Attorney General is authorized to institute for or in the name of the United States a civil
action in any appropriate district court of the United States
against such parties and for such relief as may be appropriate, and such court shall have and shall exercise jurisdiction of proceedings instituted pursuant to this section.
(2) signed by an individual, or his parent, to the effect that he has been denied admission to or not permitted to continue in attendance at a
public college by reason of race, color, religion, or national origin, and the Attorney General believes the complaint is meritorious and certifies that the signer or signers of such complaint are unable, in his judgment, to initiate and maintain appropriate legal proceedings for relief and that the institution of an
action will materially further the orderly achievement of desegregation in
public education, the Attorney General is authorized, after giving notice of such complaint to the appropriate
school board or college authority and after certifying that he is satisfied that such board or authority has had a reasonable time to adjust the conditions alleged in such complaint, to institute for or in the name of the United States a civil
action in any appropriate district court of the United States
against such parties and for such relief as may be appropriate, and such court shall have and shall exercise jurisdiction of proceedings instituted pursuant to this section, provided that nothing herein shall empower any official or court of the United States to issue any order seeking to achieve a racial balance in any
school by requiring the transportation of pupils or students from one
school to another or one
school district to another in order to achieve such racial balance, or otherwise enlarge the existing power of the court to insure compliance with constitutional standards.
The fracas eventually culminated in the creation of the ad - hoc organization
Action Against Racism in the Arts (AARA) and ushered in an era of lively public debates about institutional racism in the art world.1 As a result of this sort of multicultural activism and affirmative action policies, elite art schools like Yale came under greater political pressure to accept students of
Action Against Racism in the Arts (AARA) and ushered in an era of lively
public debates about institutional racism in the art world.1 As a result of this sort of multicultural activism and affirmative
action policies, elite art schools like Yale came under greater political pressure to accept students of
action policies, elite art
schools like Yale came under greater political pressure to accept students of color.
The principle that the motives of a legislative body are «unknowable» and deliberative secrecy do not apply to
public employers, the
School Board in this case, that decides to take disciplinary
action against employees, even if an in camera meeting is ordered.
The principle that the motives of a legislative body are «unknowable» and «deliberative secrecy» do not apply to
public employers, the
School Board in this case, that decide to take disciplinary
action against employees, even if an in camera meeting is ordered.
Two new issues, related but readily distinguishable, have arisen in the past few months, about the residential
school experience, neither of which were
public knowledge at the time of the apology and certainly not at the times of the out - of - court settlement that was negotiated
against a class
action law suit brought
against the Government and the churches.