Our team is experienced in underground storage tank regulation and litigation of actions brought pursuant to California Proposition 65, the Federal Clean Water Act and various state environmental laws and tort doctrines, including
actions alleging contamination, product defect and failure to warn regarding methyl tertiary butyl ether («MTBE»).
Not exact matches
Our lawyers have defended class
actions and individual cases
alleging personal injury and property damage from environmental
contamination or exposure to chemical products based on all types of legal theories, including negligence, fraud, failure to warn, negligent misrepresentation, trespass, private and public nuisance and damage claims such as «fear of cancer» and medical monitoring.
In a complex products liability
action involving
alleged PCB
contamination of a state office building, the Appellate Practice Group joined forces with litigation counsel to convert a $ 60 million judgment to a defense verdict for a large, multinational company.
Smith v. Inco, 2011 ONCA 628, was a class
action by thousands of Port Colborne residents who
alleged loss in property value due to public concern about potential health risks from nickel
contamination on their property.
Defense of high visibility mass
action toxic tort claims against major energy concern by residents of beach community for
alleged contamination of public and private real property and for
alleged exposure to carcinogenic chemicals and compounds
He also represents clients in environmental litigation, including class
action suits
alleging ground water
contamination and landfill suits
alleging improper acceptance, classification and disposal of liquid wastes.
Defense of a chemical manufacturer in mass
action claims for medical monitoring, property damage and personal injury arising out of
alleged environmental
contamination in West Virginia.
Banga: multi-party Commercial Court
action arising out of
alleged vapour phase
contamination of gasoil cargo raising technical issues as to mechanism, seaworthiness and due diligence.
He has litigated a broad range of issues, including Federal preemption; electrocution injuries; failure to warn and design defect; the admissibility of economic testimony; price - fixing and essential facilities; groundwater
contamination; primary and exclusive administrative jurisdiction;
alleged asbestos exposure; the extraterritorial application of Federal and state law, and the certification and decertification of consumer class
actions.
The
actions have been brought by various states, including Vermont and New Jersey, seeking to recover damages for
alleged groundwater
contamination at sites throughout those states.
Venezia v. Coldwell Banker Sammis Realty (270 A.D. 2d 480)- buyer's
action against seller for fraud for failing to disclose toxic
contamination of untapped ground water beneath the property and surrounding area dismissed; cause of
action against brokers severed; buyer's claim of fraud against seller was extinguished upon closing as a result of specific merger clause in contract of sale; moreover, buyer's failed to
allege that seller made any representation about the condition of the land's subsurface or groundwater and did not
allege that seller engaged in concealment or otherwise deceitful conduct designed to prevent the discovery of such
contamination; seller is under no duty to speak; salesperson of one of the defendant real estate agencies represented to buyer that the house was in good condition