The comptroller's office on Monday announced what is known as a derivative lawsuit that allows shareholders to file legal
actions on the behalf of a corporation when its officers or directors have failed to meet their required fiduciary responsibilities.
The defendants argued that the claim was solely Martinrea's claim and that it had to be pursued as a derivative
action on behalf of the corporation, with leave of the court.
Not exact matches
NEW YORK --(BUSINESS WIRE)-- The Klein Law Firm announces that a class
action complaint has been filed
on behalf of shareholders
of Celgene
Corporation (NASDAQ: CELG) who purchased shares between September 12, 2016 and February 27, 2018.
Another independent expenditure (or IE) group, New Yorkers for Independent
Action weighed in
on behalf of CM Cabrera who is a staunch supporter
of school choice, charter schools and education tax credits for individuals and
corporations that donate to public, private and parochial schools.
A proposed class
action was commenced
on May 25, 2010 against Thomson Reuters
Corporation and Thomson Reuters Canada Limited
on behalf of a class
of Canadian lawyers and law firms.
Multiple investigations, cases and
actions brought
on behalf of Fortune 500
corporations for thefts and misappropriation
of trade secrets.
In Crawford v. London (City), 2000 CanLII 22350 (
ON SC), (2000), 47 OR (3d) 784 (S.C.J.), leave to appeal ref'd, [2000] O.J. No. 2088 (S.C.J.), referred to in the decision, a class action was permitted because an individual unit owner could not maintain a representative action under any act in Ontario on behalf of current or former owners of any of the units in a condominium corporatio
ON SC), (2000), 47 OR (3d) 784 (S.C.J.), leave to appeal ref'd, [2000] O.J. No. 2088 (S.C.J.), referred to in the decision, a class
action was permitted because an individual unit owner could not maintain a representative
action under any act in Ontario
on behalf of current or former owners of any of the units in a condominium corporatio
on behalf of current or former owners
of any
of the units in a condominium
corporation.
Sections 171 and 172
of the Strata Property Act, S.B.C. 1998, c. 43, permitted a strata
corporation to bring an
action on behalf of and as a representative
of owners.
You can also create rules around the appointment and termination
of officers, specify what earnings must be passed to the shareholders as dividends, and agree
on what
actions officers and shareholders may make
on behalf of the
corporation.
This class
action was commenced in May 2010 against Thomson Reuters
Corporation and Thomson Reuters Canada Limited
on behalf of a class
of Canadian lawyers and law firms.
On February 27, 2018, Barclay Damon commenced an action in federal court in Chicago seeking recovery of $ 1.2 billion on behalf Shelbourne North Water Street Corporation, the frustrated developer of the Chicago Spire, against National Asset Management Agency and National Asset Loan Management, both statutory bodies of the Republic of Irelan
On February 27, 2018, Barclay Damon commenced an
action in federal court in Chicago seeking recovery
of $ 1.2 billion
on behalf Shelbourne North Water Street Corporation, the frustrated developer of the Chicago Spire, against National Asset Management Agency and National Asset Loan Management, both statutory bodies of the Republic of Irelan
on behalf Shelbourne North Water Street
Corporation, the frustrated developer
of the Chicago Spire, against National Asset Management Agency and National Asset Loan Management, both statutory bodies
of the Republic
of Ireland.
The Court's decision in California State Teachers» Retirement System v. Alvarez — a suit brought
on behalf of Wal - Mart Stores, Inc. — refused to adopt the Delaware Court
of Chancery's recommendation that, as a matter
of federal due process, a judgment in one derivative
action should not bind the
corporation or its stockholders in another derivative
action unless either (i) the first
action has survived a motion to dismiss because a pre-suit demand
on the
corporation's board
of directors would have been futile or (ii) the board has given the plaintiff authority to proceed
on the
corporation's
behalf by declining to oppose the derivative suit.
The plaintiff's
action is brought
on its own
behalf, and
on behalf of a Class defined as all land surveyors (individuals,
corporations or partnerships) in Ontario who,
on or before March 26, 2014, were the:
Sharon Ava & Co., Inc. v. Olympic Tower Assoc. (259 A.D. 2d 315)- plaintiff fails to establish that it was licensed at the time it procured lease transaction and is barred by RPL § 442 - d from commencing
action to recover commission; fact that corporate plaintiff's president was licensed broker at the time
of the transaction does not save the cause
of action on behalf of the unlicensed
corporation.