• Educate researchers about their legal rights and responsibilities on issues surrounding their work; • Serve as a clearinghouse for information related to legal
actions taken against scientists; and • Recruit and assist lawyers representing these scientists.
Narasimha wrote in a letter to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh that the «
actions taken against the scientists could demoralize the Indian Space Research Organization's scientific community, and adversely affect its ability to take the kind of technological initiatives — not always without risk — that are the hallmark of an innovative organization.»
We also serve as a clearinghouse for information related to legal
action taken against scientists, which can inform strategies for — and outcomes of — future cases.
Not exact matches
In 1976, the AAAS Board and Council jointly created a permanent Committee on Scientific Freedom and Responsibility to develop policies and procedures to protect
scientists, engineers and health care professionals
against infringements of scientific freedom and responsibility, to monitor policies and
actions taken by governments that might affect their professional rights and duties, and to promote attention to scientific freedom and responsibility within AAAS, its affiliated societies, and the general public.
The risk of legal attack on any individual
scientist is small, but there are
actions researchers can
take to protect and defend themselves
against politically - motivated attacks.
As they tend to do from time to time in an effort to distract from the climate science consensus, a group of
scientists who are also climate «skeptics» have published an opinion - editorial (op - ed), trying to make the case
against taking action to address climate change.
Jacobson has even suggested that he might
take legal
action against NOAA
scientist Christopher Clack and twenty coauthors whose critical evaluation of his work was published by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in June.
We also call for an end to McCarthy - like threats of criminal prosecution
against our colleagues based on innuendo and guilt by association, the harassment of
scientists by politicians seeking distractions to avoid
taking action, and the outright lies being spread about them.
We call for an end to McCarthy - like threats of criminal prosecution
against our colleagues based on innuendo and guilt by association, the harassment of
scientists by politicians seeking distractions to avoid
taking action, and the outright lies being spread about them.
The first link in my article
takes readers to a prior one where I show how the very same Sheldon Rampton appeared before a US House hearing and regurgitated an accusation phrase
against skeptic
scientists that was made famous by anti-skeptic book author Ross Gelbspan and the enviro - advocacy group Ozone
Action in 1996 - 7 — these people have every appearance of being the epicenter of the accusation that skeptic
scientists operate under a coal / oil industry directive to fabricate false assessments in exchange for mega-millions...... an accusation that has no evidence to support it that I can find, and its central piece of evidence is a 1991 coal industry memo that no one is allowed to see in its complete context.
Further, «We also call for an end to McCarthy - like threats of criminal prosecution
against our colleagues based on innuendo and guilt by association, the harassment of
scientists by politicians seeking distractions to avoid
taking action, and the outright lies being spread about them.»