With LegalZoom's win in South Carolina, the Alabama suit dismissed, and the Arkansas case sent to arbitration, the only
active court action against LegalZoom over the UPL issue is the North Carolina case.
But, here, two of the Second Circuit's
active judges ruled
against Marblegate, the dissent was by a senior judge who can not vote on an en banc petition, and the Second Circuit has historically granted fewer en banc rehearings than any other circuit
court.5 Other avenues could include Marblegate filing a petition for a writ of certiorari with the US Supreme Court and / or pursuing other federal or state law remedies, including state law theories of successor liability or fraudulent conveyance against the new EDMC subsidiary, theories that the Second Circuit noted as potential causes of action but did not ana
court.5 Other avenues could include Marblegate filing a petition for a writ of certiorari with the US Supreme
Court and / or pursuing other federal or state law remedies, including state law theories of successor liability or fraudulent conveyance against the new EDMC subsidiary, theories that the Second Circuit noted as potential causes of action but did not ana
Court and / or pursuing other federal or state law remedies, including state law theories of successor liability or fraudulent conveyance
against the new EDMC subsidiary, theories that the Second Circuit noted as potential causes of
action but did not analyze.