Not exact matches
If
active investing was a
skill you could definitively learn and profit from, I think many would prefer it to the 9 - 5.
So when I say we want an ambitious,
active government, prepared to
invest in
skills, homes and infrastructure, to free individuals to be the very best they can be, it is because I am a liberal, and to be a liberal is to support those with enterprise.
IF, and this is will depend on many factors, but IF I become more confident in my stock selection
skills based (we're talking value
investing here), I'll pare the passive part down to maybe 60 % total (20 % each component) and have 40 %
active.
1:12:11 — Patrick looks to get Michael's take on quantitative
investing and if it is taking away the
skill from other
active managers.
Active investment in the stock market is very different to passive
investing and hence requires a different mindset and different
skill set for decision making.
A flexible, opportunistic stock fund that combines the
skills and expertise of multiple
active managers to
invest across sectors, market caps, and investment styles.
Whenever the points
invested in a
skill reach a certain threshold, a new ability (
active command) or trait (passive bonus) is gained, with the 10th and final ability or trait gained at 100 points.
That requires
active investing (developing knowledge, time and
skill) of which most of the investors I deal with are not interested in being.
There is one more option that I should mention... if the people you approach can contribute a
skill and become an
active partner they can
invest their money without the private offering.