Jonathan frequently
acts in cases concerned with EU law.
Our team has extensive experience in field of «serious medical treatment», having recently
acted in cases concerning Obstetric / gynaecological treatment for women with mental health difficulties; Withholding or withdrawing artificial nutrition and hydration from a person in a permanent vegetative state or a minimally conscious state; Organ or bone marrow donation by a person who lacks capacity to consent; Non-therapeutic sterilisation of a person who lacks capacity to consent and Life - saving but invasive surgical treatment.
He has acted for successful applicants for leave to appeal under s. 69 of
the Act in cases concerning points of law on implied indemnities in a voyage charter; the assessment of damages for loss of a time charter; liability for restowage expenses and hire following a cargo shift; and in connection with speed and performance claims.
He also
acts in cases concerning the overlap between the Administrative Court and the Court of Protection.
Holly regularly advises and
acts in cases concerning the range of community care issues, including needs assessment and provision, capacity issues and Court of Protection applications, deprivation of liberty, deputy appointments, etc..
He has
acted in cases concerning the commercial impact of sanctions schemes, for example IRISL v Steamship Mutual Underwriting and HM Treasury (frustration of insurance contract), and Maud v Libyan Investment Authority (the ability of a sanctioned entity to initiate bankruptcy proceedings).
Not exact matches
In that case, God does not force His human children, nor do they act in entire independence of God's concer
In that
case, God does not force His human children, nor do they
act in entire independence of God's concer
in entire independence of God's
concern.
This
concern figures prominently
in the
case of cremation, which is disturbing to the sister who interprets that
act as a violation of her sister and a threat to her resurrection.
Tomorrow and Wednesday, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments
in two
cases regarding same - sex marriage... one
concerning California's Proposition 8 and the other the Defense of Marriage
Act.
For if a relationship is to make a difference to the entities involved, as opposed to being purely «external» 5 — and such a difference is precisely what is involved
in a «structural relationship» — then that relationship can only be effected by the
acting of the entities
concerned; since unless they
act to bring about a relationship, any relationship which there might be would be entirely external, as it is
in the
case of the physical conceived as «matter.»
That piety guided him to simplify his business and family life so that they would serve the «
concern» that grew upon him until he became a one - man abolition society traversing the colonies to
act for justice
in the
case of slaves.65
If you did you would be more
concerned about the 38 MILLLION
cases in the general public than the maybe 4000
acts committed by priests.
This ability also enables human beings to
act on the basis of a much broader scope of
concern for others than is possible
in the
case of subhuman creatures.
Goodell's memorandum also promised support and training to athletes to help prevent future
cases of domestic violence, though the NFLPA has a host of
concerns with the program — chiefly, that the program is too
concerned with how players may be punished if they commit an
act domestic violence, rather than fostering values to stop domestic violence from occurring
in the first place.
As Hatch notes, the cohabiting couples she interviewed look and
act a lot like married couples, with the same
concerns and arguments, shared responsibilities (including
in some
cases children) and yes, even commitment.
Besides, under the «Targeted Lendület Research» grant scheme, the MTA and the company (as grantors) on the one hand, and the research unit
acting as host institution — alternatively, the MTA TKI
in the
case of a university - based research group --(as grantee (s)-RRB- on the other hand, shall conclude an agreement with each other, laying down the detailed rules
concerning the use of the grant amounts as well as the possibilities of transferring any intellectual property rights related to the results of the activities supported by the grant.
In any
case, he doesn't seem to have any problems letting actors do their thing, at least as far as A Bigger Splash was
concerned: «I cast people who are not going to «
act» but are going to «behave».»
In fact, it allows for Romney and conservative and Republican reformers
acting as surrogates for his campaign to make a strong
case that neither Obama nor Duncan are fit to take on the tough task of advancing systemic reform from the federal level; given that swing states such as Virginia have been granted waivers despite their poor records on advancing reform, they can even argue that the waivers are politically - motivated by the president's re-election
concerns (even though there is no evidence of this).
In either
case, you must support Bill 1096, An
Act Concerning Charter Schools.
In case of a dispute concerning the validity of the information provided by DOT to the Attorney General, or his / her designee, it shall be a routine use of the information in any DOT system of records to make any disclosures of such information to the National Background Information Check System, established by the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, as may be necessary to resolve such disput
In case of a dispute
concerning the validity of the information provided by DOT to the Attorney General, or his / her designee, it shall be a routine use of the information
in any DOT system of records to make any disclosures of such information to the National Background Information Check System, established by the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, as may be necessary to resolve such disput
in any DOT system of records to make any disclosures of such information to the National Background Information Check System, established by the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention
Act, as may be necessary to resolve such dispute.
It is primarily
concerned with the jurisdictions
in the common law, and deals with the
cases of civil wrong where someone else has to suffer loss or harm which results
in legal liability for the person who happens to commit a tortuous
act.
[FN69] The Federal Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organizations (RICO)
Act [FN70] has also been employed
in cases concerning a variety of credit repair services.
A court granted the Humane Society of Missouri and a Missouri citizen
concerned for the welfare of dogs permission to enter a legal
case as defendants
in a challenge to the Puppy Mill Cruelty Prevention
Act initiative.
As far as this historic period is
concerned, the reconstruction of past temperatures based on deep boreholes
in deep permafrost is one of the best past temperature proxies we have (for the global regions with permafrost — polar regions and mountainous regions)-- as a signal of average temperatures it's even more accurate than historic direct measurements of the air temperature, since the earth's upper crust
acts as a near perfect conservator of past temperatures — given that no water circulation takes place, which is precisely the
case in permafrost where by definition the water is frozen.
Labor pretends to be
concerned by climate change, but do nothing to stop support for the fossil fuel industry (Adani coal mine is a
case in point), and continue the green wash of society who actually think that they are
acting on the issue.
Individual applicants no longer need to meet the arbitrary and harsh test of individual
concern when they seek to challenge an
act of general application that is a non-legislative
act (and there are many of such
acts, including the regulation that implements the contested legislative
act in this
case itself!).
Article 2 With regard to
cases concerning an order issued prior to the enforcement of this
Act pursuant to the provisions of Article 10 of the
Act on the Prevention of Spousal Violence and the Protection of Victims prior to the revision by this
Act (referred to as the «Old
Act»
in the following paragraph) pertaining to a petition for an order under the same Article, the provisions then
in force shall remain applicable.
The Chamber joined with a coalition of business groups to file a reply brief
in support of its cross-motion for summary judgment
in these two
cases concerning the listing of the northern long - eared bat as a threatened species under the Endangered Species
Act.
in a
case concerning novel issues of class construction under the Companies
Act.
It advised HQ Theatres and Hospitality on TUPE advice
concerning its acquisition of a new theatre and
acted for a secondary school
in a
case concerning allegations of discrimination against a disabled pupil.
She is instructed
in a wide range of company
cases, from actions
concerning share purchase agreements to numerous applications pursuant to the Companies
Act 2006.
More recently, Neil has
acted exclusively for government departments and agencies
in work of this nature and has been involved
in some of the most - high profile such
cases including the Alexander Litvinenko inquest / inquiry, the Saudi arms trade litigation and a number of applications to European Court of Human Rights
concerned with the bulk interception of communications and communications data.
Gregg & Co. (Knottingley) Ltd. & Anor - v - Emhart Glass Ltd. [2005] EWHC 804 (TCC)-- a Technology & Construction Court
case, successfully
acting for a customer
in a claim
concerning the supply of defective industrial equipment.
The Alabama Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement
Act (UCCJEA) applies
in cases where a custody decision is made or which impact access to a child — including divorce, legal separation, neglect, dependency, guardianship, paternity, termination of parental rights, and protection from abuse
concerning the legal custody, physical custody and visitation of children are decided.
The view of the Advocate General, whereby a different legal element —
concerning for example the intention of the perpetrator — could entail that the «
acts» (Article 54 CISA) or the «offence» (Article 50 CFREU) are not the same for the purpose of ne bis
in idem, is not entirely persuasive as regards its coherence with the previous CJEU
case law.
Furthermore, the AG's reference to the Grimaldi and Gauweiler
cases also support this opinion: only
acts, whatever they are, adopted by an EU institution (like a recommendation from the Commission
in the first
case, and decisions of the Governing Council of the European Central Bank,
in the second
case) are
concerned by Article 267 TFEU.
Whereas,
in the latter
case, it is entitled to avoid the policy if it can establish that the consumer either knew or did not care that the misrepresentation was: (i) untrue or misleading; and (ii) that it
concerned a matter that was relevant to the insurer (ie that it was a material misrepresentation), regardless of whether it might have been prepared to offer cover on different terms, see s 5 (2) and Sch 1 Pt 1 (2) of the
Act.
In a case concerning an alleged discrimanatory pension scheme in the Czech republic that resulted from the dissolvation of Czechoslovakia, it held that the Court in its judgment in Case C - 399 / 09 Landtová acted ultra vires and subsequently gave Czech national law precedence over EU la
In a
case concerning an alleged discrimanatory pension scheme in the Czech republic that resulted from the dissolvation of Czechoslovakia, it held that the Court in its judgment in Case C - 399 / 09 Landtová acted ultra vires and subsequently gave Czech national law precedence over EU
case concerning an alleged discrimanatory pension scheme
in the Czech republic that resulted from the dissolvation of Czechoslovakia, it held that the Court in its judgment in Case C - 399 / 09 Landtová acted ultra vires and subsequently gave Czech national law precedence over EU la
in the Czech republic that resulted from the dissolvation of Czechoslovakia, it held that the Court
in its judgment in Case C - 399 / 09 Landtová acted ultra vires and subsequently gave Czech national law precedence over EU la
in its judgment
in Case C - 399 / 09 Landtová acted ultra vires and subsequently gave Czech national law precedence over EU la
in Case C - 399 / 09 Landtová acted ultra vires and subsequently gave Czech national law precedence over EU
Case C - 399 / 09 Landtová
acted ultra vires and subsequently gave Czech national law precedence over EU law.
Many of its files will be familiar to regular readers of the national media, and include the $ 9 - billion Sino - Forest Corp. shareholder class action claim; an application against Rogers Communications Inc. and Chatr Wireless Inc. involving a constitutional challenge to the Competition
Act; and a
case concerning oil pollution
in the Amazon
in which the firm
acted for Ecuadoran plaintiffs.
In the case of Lambert v. Travelers Indemnity Company of America, three judges resolved disagreements between the workers» compensation law and the Automobile Insurance Cost Reduction Act, both of which concern the way in which medical liens should be satisfie
In the
case of Lambert v. Travelers Indemnity Company of America, three judges resolved disagreements between the workers» compensation law and the Automobile Insurance Cost Reduction
Act, both of which
concern the way
in which medical liens should be satisfie
in which medical liens should be satisfied.
(1) Regarding the formation and effect of a contract (excluding labor contracts; hereinafter referred to
in this Article as «consumer contract») between a consumer (i.e., an individual, excluding those
cases where the party
acts as a business or for a business) and a business operator (i.e., a juridical person or other corporate association, or an individual
in those
cases where the party is
acting as a business or for a business), even where by choice under Article 7 or variation under Article 9, the applicable law would be a law other than that of the consumer's habitual residence, when the consumer indicates to the business operator his or her intention that a particular mandatory rule from within the law of the consumer's habitual residence should apply, this mandatory rule shall also apply to the matters covered by the rule
concerning the consumer contract's formation and effect.
Girleanu v. Romania, ECtHR,
acting alone, represented Guardian News and Media Limited
in a third party intervention before the European Court of Human Rights
in a
case concerning the imposition of sanctions upon a journalist for possession of sensitive information alleged to impinge upon national security.
Work highlights
Acted for Public
Concern at Work, the UK's leading whistle - blowing charity, on a
case which resulted
in LLP members being classified as «workers», and consequently winning the right to all relevant whistle - blowing protections.
Belhadj v. Security Service [2015] UKIPTrib 13 132 - H (IPT): Junior Counsel for the Claimant
in a landmark
case concerning the interpretation and application of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers
Act and the protection under Article 8, ECHR of confidential information,
in particular, legally privileged information.
[73]
In this
case, Canadian Transit — established as a federal corporation under the federal Special
Act to pursue federal objects and invoking a federal provision allowing the Federal Court to make declarations
concerning federal works and undertakings — has asked the Federal Court what exactly its rights are... [more]
As to the fourth issue, where, as
in the instant
case, the person
concerned was ex-hypothesi disabled and the public authority was discharging its functions under statutes which expressly directed its attention to the needs of the disabled persons, it might be entirely superfluous to make express reference to s 49A of the 1995
Act and absurd to infer from an omission to do so a failure on the authority's part to have regard to their general duty under that section.
The three dominant themes
in 2008
cases where PIL was invoked were as follows: UK / EU law implementation of UNSC resolutions
concerning freezing of alleged terrorist assets (sanctions
cases); the
acts / omissions of UK authorities
in Iraq / Afghanistan viewed
in the context of PIL and provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and Human Rights
Act 1998 (Iraq / Afghanistan related
cases); and state / diplomatic immunity
in the context of civil proceedings and / or attempts to enforce arbitration awards against assets of State entities
in the UK (Civil immunity
cases).
«TCC claims 2.1 The following are examples of the types of claim which it may be appropriate to bring as TCC claims --(a) building or other construction disputes, including claims for the enforcement of the decisions of adjudicators under the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration
Act 1996; (b) engineering disputes; (c) claims by and against engineers, architects, surveyors, accountants and other specialised advisers relating to the services they provide; (d) claims by and against local authorities relating to their statutory duties
concerning the development of land or the construction of buildings; (e) claims relating to the design, supply and installation of computers, computer software and related network systems; (f) claims relating to the quality of goods sold or hired, and work done, materials supplied or services rendered; (g) claims between landlord and tenant for breach of a repairing covenant; (h) claims between neighbours, owners and occupiers of land
in trespass, nuisance etc; (i) claims relating to the environment (for example, pollution
cases); (j) claims arising out of fires; (k) claims involving taking of accounts where these are complicated; and (l) challenges to decisions of arbitrators
in construction and engineering disputes including applications for permission to appeal and appeals.»
Chief Constable of West Midlands Police v Blackburn [2009] IRLR 135 (Court of Appeal) Appeared (led by Elizabeth Slade QC — now Mrs Justice Slade) on behalf of the Chief Constable at first instance,
in the EAT and
in the Court of Appeal
in a
case brought under the Equal Pay
Act 1970
concerning the genuine material factor defence and justification for the payment of night shift supplements.
Concerning the «new public» criterion the AG opined that it would only be applicable
in cases where the first
act of communication (to an initial public) has taken place with the consent of the copyright holder, reserving this criterion for
cases of legally posted content.