Sentences with phrase «actual answers to things»

Denying that science can find the actual answers to things is just plain silly.

Not exact matches

You are much better off to give your potential hire actual questions to answer — things you don't expect them to know but which will show if, in fact, there is what you are looking for between the ears of the person you are considering hiring!

There are more stories out of the bible that have been proven impossible and or wrong by science than have been shown to have any credibility... Of course I'm talking about actual science... not that christian science and creation «science»... which use scientific sounding things and jump to ridiculous unjustifyable conlusions, or that create incorrect premises and then make up answers to suit the questions.

@fimeilleur actually i can back up the claims i make both personally and historically, one example Abraham, Machpelah (actual location of his tomb and remains along with 5 others in Israel right where they are supposed to be) Kedorlaomer king of Elam, (defeated by Abraham and recently discovered) it is said Abraham believed God and it was credited to him as righteousness.More than that Abraham saw God and spoke with Him, not the god you are on about that men use to justify their evil intent, but the God who has created all things, the God that no one especially you can not contain.Ignorance is your choice but that will not negate the existence of God in any way.No one that i am aware of has all the answers at this point regarding spiritual things, evolution or evilution there are areas God has not yet revealed to mankind but every day more is discovered.I find it amazing that God is big enough to share discovery even with those who would reject Him.

Whitehead's insistence upon the organismic connectedness of things is certainly conducive to answering this question by means of analogy and metaphor, mapping in isomorphic fashion characteristics of the actual occasion onto the macrocosmic objects of human experience.

----- So I answer her and you, knower of all things, guru of my life experiences, the man with the crystal ball, ---- wait a minute; are you telling me as I describe my relationship with God that I haven't had an actual experience, as I describe to Lynn with God?

If the question as to why things are at all is raised in the Whiteheadian context, the answer must be in terms of the decisions of actual entities.

Before science came around to give the actual explanations to things in nature anyone saying there were no gods wouldn't have had any alternative answers so, of course, they would have looked foolish.

The usual answer is that the structure which Whitehead imputes to his functional feeling is «micrological» in character, i.e., that feeling, as the function of actual entities, belongs to an impalpable subatomic realm lying at the basis of things.

The answer lies in the application of the ontological principle, which says that»... the reasons for things are always to be found in the composite nature of definite actual entities.»

This time around we saw more of the actual game, and more details of what to expect have been confirmed, some new things have been alluded to and there is plenty to speculate about, however fewer questions have been answered than we would have liked.

When I'm doing things that aren't the actual words on the page writing, but like editing, revising things, research, answering emails, I try to do that while I'm exercising if I can, whether it's on an exercise bike or what have you.

After the registration and paperwork is done you now need office space, office equipment (and more), and unless you're a one - person brokerage you'll need staff to answer phones, create marketing material and a hundred other things that take away time from any actual selling you still need to do to pay the bills and earn an income.