Sentences with phrase «actual arguments of»

The first being an initial motion for directions from the judge, the second being the actual argument of the summary judgment motion and the third being a second hearing involving viva voce evidence, should the motions judge decide that oral evidence is necessary.

Not exact matches

The Court of Appeal rejected the arguments, saying Mars Canada had an obvious interest in defending its trademark rights, and it did sustain actual damages given that its sales were cannibalized by the grey market products.

With that said, I would like to play the devil's advocate for a second vis - à - vis your arguments regarding actual GDP growth and the overall productivity of investment.

The argument is that the warrant, submitted to a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court, relied on dubious information from the Trump - Russia dossier compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele — and that the judge was not informed about the actual source of the information.

For some, this might be an argument in favor of going online, however, there are sometimes situations when speaking with an actual person is more helpful than trying to get your home loan over the Internet.

Jewish tradition of Jesus's time would have mandated actual study and argument.

If examining rational arguments, perceiving God in transcendent experience, and delving deeply into difficult questions are what drew me closer to Christ, seeing Christ work in the lives of actual Christians is what opened my heart to Him in the first place, allowing me to see how He had been working in my own life all along, even when I had refused to seek Him.

Opponents of Catholic moral teaching, whether inside or outside the Church, seldom give actual arguments; more often, they demonize the «harsh,» «obsessive,» «judgmental» Catholic who emphasizes dogma and wants to tell others how to live their lives.

You have an agenda, so instead of trying to understand my arguments you're just rattling off a lot of irrelevant stuff that does nothing to address my actual points and then declaring I haven't proved anything.

Denying that some of these myths sprang from actual people at the time kind of undercuts our argument.

(2) Abstraction from the actual antecedent world of conditions which may fit the requirements of a hypothetico - deductive argument precludes the possibility of accounting for the emergence of a given novel event in its full particularity.

But once one has seen that the advocacy of education and science as solutions to the world's problems expresses the interests of those who are rich and powerful and that the actual effects weaken the weak and impoverish the poor, one discounts the arguments of proponents of the existing systems.

Based upon my experience, it is all too often the atheist / agnostic audience that poses emotional, baseless, illogical arguments that show a lack of actual critical thinking.

Saying someone «has no clue» is not convincing as an argument if it's not accompanied by actual reasons, lines of evidence, etc..

The argument that life begins at conception is absurd in that what should be said is parasitic life begins at conception, actual human life only becomes a valid argument when the fetus is able to live outside the womb, prior to that the life is basically in the hands of the host — mother.

jack: I appreciate your ability to create an actual argument, as opposed to many of the rantings on this board.

Cal, they are trying to show atheists to be hypocrites and think it is easier to try to use the cry of «hypocrite» instead of making an actual argument because they do not have any arguments that can not be torn down.

Despite many interpretive arguments to the contrary, it seems undeniable that Whitehead intended «actuality» (or «actual») to be a proper predication of superjects.

Also, by a similar transitivity argument, condition (I) is satisfied: If F were identical to D, each actual entity in F would feel an actual entity in F, contradicting the definition of «duration.»

For if the argument appeals to contingent features of the interrelation of actual occasions in our cosmic epoch, it obviously can not settle the relation of God and the world.

My argument has presented an analysis of the extensive continuum which clearly makes it true to say that the extensive continuum, as just that set of actual relations among actual occasions which makes the very conception of the continuum as real potentiality intelligible, is indeed actually increased in extent by the concrescence of new occasions.

Sherburne tends, in his argument against regional inclusion, to quote passages in which Whitehead is making the point that when the region of an actual occasion is divided the subregions correspond to its physical feelings but that these physical feelings are not actual occasions capable of independent existence.

I even agree with the conclusion he takes «from these various argument... that the unity of a subject involves irrevocably the extensive elements which identify the standpoint, or region, of an actual entity» (PS 1:104).

To frame the argument the way you framed it is an injustice to those of us who can take actual meaning from between the lines of religion instead of finding every possible way to demean it.

For the British, it was the actual experience of slavery in some of its most brutal forms in the West Indies that precipitated thinking hard about slavery, which then precipitated biblical and theological arguments against it, which then led to political action.»

This is the actual context of Sherburne's argument.

The argument is fine if one is genetically engineering clones, but this possible range of diversity simple isn't expressed in actual reproduction; particularly when starting with only two individuals.

Very true Capitalist, they won't provide any argument because their is no actual way to know whether or not there is a god or the nature of existence after death.

My first point is that there already exists a carefully documented set of arguments which shows that within the Whiteheadian system it is impossible for there to be any relation of overlapping or inclusion among standpoints of actual occasions.

Very true Capitalist, the believers won't provide any argument because their is no actual way to know whether or not there is a god or the nature of existence after death.

Julie in Austin, (I actual used to go to school at the Jewish temple in downtown Austin) «In other cases, it assumes (as often do the arguments of Atheists) the very conclusion it is trying to reach».

Sentence two is the closest to an actual argument he makes, but it is a fact that science has little to no information on what happens after we die, as you pointed out yourself, we do not know (in the sense of having empirical proof).

In dealing with the arguments that underlie the primordial nature of God and / or the principle of concretion, Ely states that they are based «on a fundamental postulate of Whitehead's — that the possible is prior to the actual, not only logically but metaphysically» (p. 14).

I accept the results of this argument and grant that eternal objects are present in the first phase of concrescence as realized determinant [s]» (PR 239 / 366) of the actual entities that are being prehended by the new actual entity.

Winer relegated the Granville Sharp rule to obscurity for nearly a hundred years with nothing more than a disparaging mention in a footnote — sheer scholarly intimidation, and not a scintilla of actual argument.

Richard Dawkins» The God Delusion has a subchapter on «the argument from personal «experience,»» but he spends no time exploring the actual experience of God.

This argument is that Paul could not have recognized as Jesus the glorious figure which, according to Acts, appeared to him in his vision on the Damascus road, if he had not already had in his mind such a picture of Jesus as could have been gained only by actual sight.

If the argument in favor of the correspondence of an entertained possibility of a state of affairs to an actual state of affairs is entirely based on coherence and consistency, we seem to be left with the question as to what more is affirmed, when we claim correspondence, than that this is the most coherent and consistent belief to hold?

My argument is not against the intentions and actual sensibility of leading deep ecologists.

Often they explain the history of thought and argument that has led to contextual relativism in ways that imply that their accounts correspond to important features of an actual tradition of thought.

The reader, who understands this, will also understand that our argument has no interest in nor is affected by marginal and non-typicalcases (as, for instance, the older man who marries and may not be capable of actual insemination).

In concluding this argument for God as the cause of the being as well as of the form of actual occasions, I want to suggest that Whitehead's thought moved in the direction I have developed.

This final part of Griffin's argument for the process theodicy turns on an assumption that he appears to have borrowed by Hartshorne, viz., that the so - called «social view» of omnipotence is the only alternative to the monopolistic (and thus to the standard) view.9 The critique of the latter thus established the former as (in Griffin's words) «the only view that is coherent if one is talking about the power a being with the greatest conceivable amount of power could have over a created, i.e. an actual world» (GPE 269).

This is the form of the cosmological argument, now generally abandoned as invalid; because our notion of causation concerns the relations of stares of things within the actual world, and can only be illegitimately extended to a transcendent derivation.

I.e., the more pa.ssionate and fervent the argument, the greater likelihood the cause is a suppression of belief for the contrary argument, and the subsequent confirmation that it is the (actual) truer statement.

Argument: Suppose again that A and B are actual beings and that A has power to completely determine the activities of B even when B is doing whatever it can to determine its own activities for itself.

Truth is quite vague — lets get into the quality of this argument with some actual definable propositions of «truth».

«8 He even echoed the argument that some of the Southern apologists used for very different purposes; namely that the slave is in some degree better off than the factory worker since he never faces the uncertainties of unemployment or the pangs of actual physical want that afflict the latter.

The same argument, it might be added, applies to the view, such as Cobb's, that God is a never - ending series of actual entities.

I have four of my own arguments against the reinterpretation of creativity as the substantial activity at the base of things; (a) first, assuming that we reject a nominalist interpretation, and assuming that this substantial activity can not be parsed as a factor in one or more actual entities, it would have to have some kind of identity of its own.