This week, new research supported what moms sick of parent shaming have long suspected: people often judge how dangerous a given parenting practice is based on their sense of how moral it is, not based on a reasoned assessment of
actual danger to the child.
That is, people overestimate
the actual danger to children who are left alone by their parents, in order to better support or justify their moral condemnation of parents who do so.»
Not exact matches
Committed
to the mission of «fighting the belief that our
children are in constant
danger,» Free - Range Kids combats our greatest parenting fears with
actual stats, studies, and advice
to help keep kids safe without hindering their growth.
We need
to teach
children how
to be aware of their surroundings and keep an eye out for
actual danger by doing so ourselves.
Alienating strategies include bad - mouthing or denigrating the other parent in front of the
child (or within earshot), 2,3 limiting the
child's contact with the other parent, 4 trying
to erase the other parent from the
child's mind (e.g., withholding pictures of the
child with the other parent), 2 creating and perpetuating a belief the other parent is dangerous (when there is no evidence of
actual danger), 2 forcing the
child to reject the other parent, and making the
child feel guilty if he or she talks about enjoying time with the other parent.2 The impact of these behaviors on
children is devastating, but it also often has the opposite intended effect; parents who denigrate the other parent are actually less close with their
children than those who do not.3
Many alienating parents at this stage entertain the overt belief that the target parent presents an
actual danger of harm
to the
children.
Due
to lack of data on
actual real - world exposures, EPA has proposed a highly sophisticated alternative «framework» which instead would evaluate the probability that
children might someday be exposed
to lead paint
dangers in a commercial building