It was easy to guess that someone will attack the paper based on the name of the first author, but who is going to point out
actual errors in the paper.
Not exact matches
What I am refuting is that there is not enough evidence with this
paper to say x is now greater than y and that it does not differ greatly with historical evidence, There may be an
error, on the hot side (
in the models), but the
actual historical trend line didn't really change.
It makes quickly removing basic
errors when jotting down quick notes
in OneNote an easy process and also helps ensure the Surface Pro 4's writing experience more closely replicates the feeling of writing on
actual paper.