2) The bible is a work of fiction, or at least it's not a fully factual account of
actual events in history.
Incarnation is
an actual event in the history of Spirit: God «empties» himself completely of his transcendent form and is now becoming totally incarnate in the world.
Not exact matches
The books of the New Testament were closer
in time to the
actual event than most
histories of that time or earlier that are generally accepted as true.
But we maintain, on the contrary, that we know the Jesus of
history very well, even if we do not have a precise and photographic account of his day - by - day activities; and the unique claim of Christianity is that
in and by those
events in the
actual realm of historical happenedness, God is revealed — revealed, of course,
in and under the conditions of
history and human life, but revealed nonetheless.
To confess the death of God is to speak of an
actual and real
event, not perhaps an
event occurring
in a single moment of time or
history, but notwithstanding this reservation an
event that has actually happened both
in a cosmic and
in a historical sense.
If God foresees the
actual details of the future,
events in nature -
history are nothing but the unfolding of a previously written scroll negating creaturely freedom.
Thus if «I» do something like «deciding upon a course of action,» that «deciding» is not» to be attributed to an «I» which is to be regarded as
in some way distinct relatively to the
actual spatiotemporal
events comprising the occurrences of my life -
history: it is to be attributed to those occurrences themselves.
Such a problem would lead us to suggest that the only consistent alternatives would be either a radical, a historical translation as mentioned above, or — if the historical framework of biblical thought were to be retained — a systematic theology where the bridge between the centuries of biblical
events and our own time was found
in the
actual history of the church as still ongoing
history of God's people.
Where Whitehead and Santayana are strikingly similar is
in holding that the spatio - temporal world is ultimately atomic or quantic so that what constitutes the world at any one moment, or a piece of
history, is a system of facts,
events, natural moments, or
actual occasions, whose relations (or perhaps rather possibilities of relations) constitute space and time (as opposed to their being as mere possibilities of relations) rather than are
in them as containers (see ED 27).
Please don't listen to these people on here they have so many different views and ideas of their own but don't listen to them they have closed their heart to God and are doing Satans work of misleading people away from the Almighty they look for men who like to have their ears tickled so don't take mine our anyone else's word for it look it up for your self
history attests to the bible as true and The writings of Moses is far older than anything they have ever found thats right Moses wrote the first parts
in the bible 3,500 years ago The scriptures weren't inspired by Pagan stories Pagan stories was inspired by
actual events just like those
in the bible because if you notice that a lot of the stories found
in the bible have a lot to do about people worshipping false Gods.
It seems to me that we have enough integrity
in our historical scholarship, even if we rely on the secular canons of historicity, to be clear that much of what the Bible records is
history or is based on reminiscence of
actual events.
I regard a Christology as modern if it uses every relevant insight of modern knowledge to differentiate the historical element
in its interpretation of the
event Jesus Christ from the mythological, and remembers that the
actual event comprises only
history and the ontological reality of God's presence and action within that
history — whilst the mythology expresses that reality
in ways which may indeed convey deep truth, yet have
in themselves the status not of ontological reality but of poetry.
It pertains not to
history as a firsthand description or recording of
actual events (Historie) but to
history in the sense of the phenomenal life of humankind
in the world (Geschichte).
The account of origins presented
in Genesis is a simple but factual presentation of
actual events and therefore provides a reliable framework for scientific research into the question of the origin and
history of life.
Mark is interested
in theology — a very elementary theology, but a real one — rather than
in history; that is to say, a theological idea is more important to him than the
actual course of
events in the life of Jesus.
The
actual redemptive presence of God
in the world is discerned less
in God's taking the sovereign lead
in events and more
in God's picking up the pieces after
history has misfired.
But whereas for Hegel as for Mill feeling is
actual in the sense that it is an
event in the
history of the mind, for the later Bradley feeling is not an
event or occurrence of any kind.
I'm curious how and when (
in a «
history or sociology» way) the unexpected
events are taken into consideration
in public discussion by the
actual working scientists — specifically.
Koei, the developer of Mystic Heroes, is well known for making games based on
actual events from the Three Kingdoms period of Chinese
history, with a few fantasy elements thrown
in.
The author brought this dark time
in history alive with her engaging story based on
actual events.
Working across various media
in portraits, interiors, nudes and landscapes, Marshall conflates
actual and imagined
events from African American
history and culture and integrates a range of stylistic influences to address the limited historiography of black art.
There are so few data observation points anyway, that water level data is surely as anecdotal as when I make references to
actual historical
events demonstrating sea levels over extended periods
in mans recent
history?
A problem could arise with biblical literalists, but one could address that by suggesting that some fictional stories have great value
in teaching some lesson or illuminating some aspect of the «human (or other sentient being) condition», and also address
actual historical
events in the translation of the bible — or one could be more abbrassive and ask «do you believe deaf people can't be saved» (see one of Paul's letters, and the
history of the Catholic Church)-- oh, you don't — so when you said you were a literalist, you were speaking figuratively?»