Sentences with phrase «actual evidence for the claim»

More formally, the fact that most people have favorable emotions associated with the claim is substituted in place of actual evidence for the claim.

I am just being a «skeptic» in the true sense of the word and asking people to provide actual evidence for the claims that they make.

More formally, the fact that most people have favorable emotions associated with the claim is substituted in place of actual evidence for the claim.

Not exact matches

There is so much information for evolution that you have to purposely avoid any actual explanation of it and the evidence behind it to make any claim like you've done.

Back your claims with actual evidence for a change... you sound crazy making it otherwise.

Believing supernatural claims for which there is not a shred of actual evidence (fact) is not a requirement (fact) of certification or actual delivery of services.

ausphor Yes, if you don't worship it it's not a god, but unless there's actual evidence for this «creative universal force» I reject any claim that it actually exists.

Because a book written by unknown authors with absolutely no actual evidence for any supernatural claim, a book the Smithsonian says is not historical, says so?

No matter how unlikely life actually is, in order to claim evidence for your position, I think, you would need to either 1) eliminate all other possibilities or 2) identify the actual probalities for all alternatives, including those we aren't aware of, or 3) show evidence of an actual designer.

That's quite a bold claim — good thing Bai's article is short enough that there's no room for actual evidence.

Some online sources claim that oil pulling can help with everything from acne to sore throat and even reduce the chance of heart disease, but I haven't been able to find any actual evidence to back up these claims, other than the fact that good oral hygiene is important for overall health.

What I mean is simply that we have as much actual empirical evidence for the existence of even one unicorn in this world as we have for the basic AGW claim that more CO2 in the atmosphere can, will and does cause a net rise in Earth's average global surface temperature, i.e. NONE whatsoever!

-- If a scientific claim is involved, check for empirical evidence to support this claim: is the claim supported by actual physical observations or reproducible experimentation?

Unless you can provide actual evidence for this, it will just remain a bald claim of your own.

All of these things are technically possible, but they are so unlikely that our default position is a bemused and often unspoken «bullshit, did not» while politely waiting for hell to freeze over and actual evidence to emerge that experimentally supports the claim.

I apologize for asking for actual evidence to justify a claim... but you know, I am a «skeptic» in the true sense of the word and actually like to see a claim backed up by evidence.

Skeptics have claimed that for years, although they can't seem to agree on what it could be, nor offer any actual evidence.

Send me TWO links, one to the paper claiming the detection of solar sunspot - cycle related effects on surface datasets that you think is the strongest evidence for your case, and the second to the actual data used in that study.

So I would recommend — modestly — that skeptics try very hard not to buy into this and redirect all such discussions to questions such as why the models are in such terrible disagreement with each other, even when applied to identical toy problems that are far simpler than the actual Earth, and why we aren't using empirical evidence (as it accumulates) to reject failing models and concentrate on the ones that come closest to working, while also not using the models that are obviously not working in any sort of «average» claim for future warming.

The deputy judge had already found that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to establish either causation or actual damages in her assessment of the Respondent's claim for mental distress.

Further, given the Respondents» evidence that they pay a flat - rate monthly fee, there is a need to provide evidence of how these charges were calculated for this specific matter while ensuring that the amounts claimed in the Bill of Costs are a reflection of the actual disbursements.

For such a business claim to succeed, the judge had been entitled to require specific evidence such as evidence of the actual use of the damaged vehicle for business purposes before the accident and the use to which the hire vehicles had been put during the period of hiFor such a business claim to succeed, the judge had been entitled to require specific evidence such as evidence of the actual use of the damaged vehicle for business purposes before the accident and the use to which the hire vehicles had been put during the period of hifor business purposes before the accident and the use to which the hire vehicles had been put during the period of hire.

Advocate for the release and / or exoneration of individuals whose cases present meritorious innocence claims based on evidence of actual innocence;

Moreover, at the mid point of 2012 we are seeing evidence that the number of claims reported is up again and that claims costs for the 2012 program (that is projected costs for resolving actual claims plus the cost of running LAWPRO's claims units) will come in at the same $ 100 million level if not more.

Relevant exculpatory DNA evidence can satisfy the Schlup v. Delo actual Innocence gateway standard for permitting habeas review of otherwise procedurally defaulted claims.

It argued that the Texas Tort Claims Act didn't waive the county's governmental immunity for the plaintiff's negligence claims because the claims didn't involve the use or condition of personal property, and the law didn't waive immunity for the premises liability claim because the evidence showed the county didn't have actual knowledge about the Claims Act didn't waive the county's governmental immunity for the plaintiff's negligence claims because the claims didn't involve the use or condition of personal property, and the law didn't waive immunity for the premises liability claim because the evidence showed the county didn't have actual knowledge about the claims because the claims didn't involve the use or condition of personal property, and the law didn't waive immunity for the premises liability claim because the evidence showed the county didn't have actual knowledge about the claims didn't involve the use or condition of personal property, and the law didn't waive immunity for the premises liability claim because the evidence showed the county didn't have actual knowledge about the water.

Dismissal for lack of evidence or prosecutorial discretion is not the same as having a right recognized on the record that would enable you to win a claim for false arrest or other damages, get state laws struck down, etc. that would be able to be done if you had an actual right.

It's important that you bring an actual, real life scenario as evidence for your claim.

79 DOS 99 Matter of DOS v. Pagano - disclosure of agency relationships; failure to appear at hearing; proper business practices; unauthorized practice of law; unearned commissions; vicarious liability; fraudulent practice; jurisdiction; ex parte hearing may proceed upon proof of proper service; DOS has jurisdiction after expiration of respondents» licenses as acts of misconduct occurred and the proceedings were commenced while the respondents were licensed; licensee fails to timely provide seller client with agency disclosure form prior to entering into listing agreement and fails to timely provide agency disclosure form to buyer upon first substantive contact; broker fails to make it clear for which party he is acting; broker violates 19 NYCRR 175.24 by using exclusive right to sell listing agreement without mandatory definitions of «exclusive right to sell» and «exclusive agency»; broker breaches fiduciary duties to seller clients by misleading them as to buyer's ability to financially consummate the transaction; broker breaches his fiduciary duty to seller by referring seller to the attorney who represented the buyers when he knew or should have known such attorney could not properly protect seller's interests; improper for broker to use listing agreements providing for broker to retain one half of any deposit if forfeited by buyer as such forfeiture clause could, by its terms, allow broker to retain part of the deposit when broker did not earn a commission; broker must conduct business under name as it appears on license; broker engaged in the unauthorized practice of law in preparing contracts for purchase and sale of real estate which did not contain a clause making it subject to the approval of the parties» attorneys and were not a form recommended by a joint bar / real estate board committee; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency in using sales contract which purported to change the terms of the listing agreement to include a higher commission; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency in using contracts of sale which were unclear, ambiguous, vague and incomplete; broker failed to amend purchase agreement to reflect amendment to increase deposit amount; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness in back - dating purchase agreements; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness in participating in scheme to have seller hold undisclosed second mortgage and to mislead first mortgagee about the purchaser's financial ability to purchase; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness by claiming unearned commission and filing affidavit of entitlement for unearned commission; DOS fails to establish by substantial evidence that respondent acted as undisclosed dual agent; corporate broker bound by the knowledge acquired by and is responsible for acts committed by its licensees within the actual or apparent scope of their authority; corporate and individual brokers» licenses revoked, no action taken on application for renewal until proof of payment of sum of $ 2,000.00 plus interests for deposits unlawfully retained

Edina introduced evidence of actual confusion by consumers who claimed to mistake MLSonline for Edina.