Sentences with phrase «actual facts and evidence»

I have made up my own mind about the 19th Congressional District race based on actual facts and evidence.
I highly suggest watching Cosmos so you can be educated outside of your bible on actual facts and evidence.

Not exact matches

That would just be ludicrous), as time goes on, there seems to be more and more evidence coming up that there isn't a god, especially YOUR kind of god at least, as the Bible just seems to be getting destroyed with actual facts.
For example, against both dualism and reductionistic determinism and in favor of the pancreationist, panexperientialist view that the actual world is made up exhaustively of partially self - determining, experiencing events, there is considerable evidence, such as the fact that a lack of complete determinism seems to hold even at the most elementary level of nature; that bacteria seem to make decisions based upon memory; that there appears to be no place to draw an absolute line between living and nonliving things, and between experiencing and nonexperiencing ones; and that physics shows nature to be most fundamentally a complex of events (not of enduring substances).
First you must have actual and real scientific proof that you are 100 % positive that there is no God.You must facts and evidence not opinions and faith.
And so because they're committed to a super-young-earth model of Creation, the AIG folks end up dismissing a ton of actual scientific and historical evidence (like the fact that we have more than 4,937 years of after - Flood history) that's really a deal - breaker for anyone who really wants to sit down and think this throuAnd so because they're committed to a super-young-earth model of Creation, the AIG folks end up dismissing a ton of actual scientific and historical evidence (like the fact that we have more than 4,937 years of after - Flood history) that's really a deal - breaker for anyone who really wants to sit down and think this throuand historical evidence (like the fact that we have more than 4,937 years of after - Flood history) that's really a deal - breaker for anyone who really wants to sit down and think this throuand think this through.
I'm waiting for all the facts and actual evidence before I pass ANY judgement.
Their mission is to get the evidence from national guidelines and medical literature into the hands of parents, professionals, and providers — to make VBAC accessible to more people based on actual facts, quality information, and current research, rather than conventional wisdom based on myths and misperceptions.
This is thinking where you look at what the actual facts are and the actual evidence is.
Add to that the anecdotal evidence that some patients can tolerate lean meats and others get sick from eating pork rinds (which, oddly enough, don't contain any actual meat at all, only fat), and alpha - gal molecules riding on fat are a strong contender for explaining both the unusual delayed reaction and the fact that it's triggered by a sugar.
The U.S. EPA in fact has no list of «endocrine disruptors» at all — preferring to assess chemicals on a case - by - case basis; taking into account the entire body of toxicological evidence available; and factoring in actual human exposure levels.
Some online sources claim that oil pulling can help with everything from acne to sore throat and even reduce the chance of heart disease, but I haven't been able to find any actual evidence to back up these claims, other than the fact that good oral hygiene is important for overall health.
The judge stated: «They have offered no evidence that consumers who use Apple's iBooks software to download ebooks have come to believe that Apple has also entered the publishing business and is the publisher of all of the downloaded books, despite the fact that each book bears the imprint of its actual publisher.»
WFA's «Information Council for the Environment» that Gelbspan so widely touts as smoking gun evidence of a top - down industry directive «to reposition global warming as theory rather than fact «lasted just six months ** [See Author's 12/19/14 note below] in its entirety, with the actual PR tour being restricted to just three cities in May of 1991 and maybe a single 60 - second national radio ad on Rush Limbaugh's program at that time.
talks about his funny but fact - filled documentary, which follows actual left - wing scientists who examine the evidence, become climate change skeptics — and are then ostracized by their peers.»
Ezra Levant Show: «Marc Morano of ClimateDepot.com talks about his funny but fact - filled documentary, which follows actual left - wing scientists who examine the evidence, become climate change skeptics — and are then ostracized by their peers.»
(and note, I don't put that word in quotes — I really mean more evidence — more facts) More actual measurements of more things is what I ask for.
That's 15 scientific studies, using actual empirical evidence, confirming the known facts and historical anecdotal evidence.
As someone who follows climate change news fairly closely, something that's been simultaneously frustrating and scary is how many people seem to believe that scientists are exaggerating the effects of climate change as a scare tactic, when in fact, if you compare their predictions with the actual observational evidence, scientists have overwhelmingly UNDERestimated the speed and violence of climate impacts.
This is why FMLA cases require the help of an employment attorney to gather the necessary evidence and prove the actual facts of what happened.
It covers confidential communications between a lawyer and his or her client, or a lawyer or client and a third party (such as a witness of fact, an expert witness or a consultant) where the dominant purpose is advising on, or obtaining evidence in relation to, actual or contemplated litigation.
The principle in R v Sussex Justices [1924] 1 KB 256, [1923] All ER Rep 233 — justice must not only be done but must manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be done — requires that, even where a tribunal shows no actual evidence of bias, it must also satisfy the «apparent bias test» in Porter v Magill [2001] UKHL 676 [2002] 2 AC, para 103 «whether the fair minded and informed observer, having considered the facts conclude that there was a real possibility that the tribunal was biased».
If, however, you were convicted, and the Court found that you knew that the victim hadn't died at the time of trial, but you did not raise the fact that the victim wasn't dead, it isn't clear if you could have the original conviction vacated because it was a fair trial and you knew evidence sufficient to get yourself acquitted (which you may have refrained from presenting to avoid conviction on a lesser charge like kidnapping or aggravated assault), and the status of an «actual innocence» grounds for vacating a conviction after trial is hotly disputed, conservatives like the late Justice Scalia generally say «no», liberals generally say «yes», moderates like to say «yes» but make it almost impossible to establish except in rare cases like one where a live person walks in when there was a murder conviction for killing that actually living person.
Adverse possession codified under s. 4 of the Limitations Act was established by evidence of three facts: (1) actual possession, (2) intention to exclude the true owner (i.e. on title) and (3) effective exclusion: Masidon Investments v. Ham, 1984 CarswellOnt 578 (C.A.), at para. 14.
D - Link denies these allegations and on Jan. 31 moved to dismiss the case on a variety of grounds, including the fact that there is no evidence of actual or likely consumer injury, and that liability can not be based on «unspecified and hypothetical» risk of future harm.
The problem is not with the juries wanting to convict on otherwise insufficient evidence, the problem is that juries seldom or never get to hear sufficient evidence to establish the sufficiency of the actual facts and circumstances involved.
Courts have authority to consider new evidence of actual innocence without regard to the statutory one - year limitation period for newly discovered evidence, and that the standard for granting a new trial based upon newly discovered evidence should not be a strict «outcome - determinative» test, at least where the state relied at trial upon facts that turned out to be false.
If they don't know the dynamics of PA, and the underlying dynamics of the family in question, they will think, something bad must have happened between this child and parent, when in actual fact all the evidence suggests the targeted parent and child had a very good relationship.
Please come back with some actual facts and / or some empirical experiential evidence, anecdotes even, to buttress your negative opinions vis a vis your perceived impression of me and my flunkie band of followers / non-producers et al..
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z