But
the actual facts in this case actually do cause grief for Graeme Frost, his family and the Democrats.
If this reads as harsh against Bungie or Activison, that's a reflection on
the actual facts in the case and not on any particular bias in the article.
Not exact matches
Except if you are worshipping at the Church of Byron Sharp,
in which
case there has to be a specific and extremely complicated reason why either the Brexit campaigners were
in actual fact targeting everyone or this campaign clearly did not work, despite what everyone is starting to suggest.
In that case, either my experience does not have (at any moment) the unity of an actual entity (i.e., it is then in fact and finally many discrete experiences and not an experience at all), or my experience is an actual occasion including, or contributed to by, both the ego and the other occasions of the nexu
In that
case, either my experience does not have (at any moment) the unity of an
actual entity (i.e., it is then
in fact and finally many discrete experiences and not an experience at all), or my experience is an actual occasion including, or contributed to by, both the ego and the other occasions of the nexu
in fact and finally many discrete experiences and not an experience at all), or my experience is an
actual occasion including, or contributed to by, both the ego and the other occasions of the nexus.
Griffin does not avail himself of the distinction proposed by Pailin, whereby God's personal attributes are those values which God has
in fact chosen for all occasions
in this
actual world,
in either
case, however, such personal attributes would be knowable
in the same way that his metaphysical attributes are, namely, by way of philosophical inquiry.
For if he could speak at all, he might have spoken long before, and the weakness
in this
case would consist
in the
fact that he did not possess the maturity of spirit and the concentration to think
in advance the whole pain but had thrust something away from him, so that the
actual pain contained a plus over and above the thought pain.
The
fact that Whitehead understands human experience to consist
in discrete «drops» or «
actual occasions» of experience may be an example of the
fact that Whitehead's generalizations were developed from more than one starting point,
in this
case modern quantum theory as well as psychology.
In each
case there is an
actual fact — positive or negative — which must correspond to the assertion; this is significant since the correspondence is a constituent of the proposition qua proposition.
For the perfected actuality passes back into the temporal world, and qualifies this world so that each temporal actuality includes it as an immediate
fact of relevant experience» (351) 3 Some interpreters refer also to Whitehead's reference to the «superjective nature» of God
in Process and Reality: «The «superjective» nature of God is the character of the pragmatic value of his specific satisfaction qualifying the transcendent creativity in the various temporal instances» (88).4 In this case, however, the actual warrant lies again on page 351, as it is under the light of that particular passage that the «superjective character» on page 88 is interpreted as a reference to the objectification of the consequent natur
in Process and Reality: «The «superjective» nature of God is the character of the pragmatic value of his specific satisfaction qualifying the transcendent creativity
in the various temporal instances» (88).4 In this case, however, the actual warrant lies again on page 351, as it is under the light of that particular passage that the «superjective character» on page 88 is interpreted as a reference to the objectification of the consequent natur
in the various temporal instances» (88).4
In this case, however, the actual warrant lies again on page 351, as it is under the light of that particular passage that the «superjective character» on page 88 is interpreted as a reference to the objectification of the consequent natur
In this
case, however, the
actual warrant lies again on page 351, as it is under the light of that particular passage that the «superjective character» on page 88 is interpreted as a reference to the objectification of the consequent nature.
NOT a hypothetical: «
In this real
case with an
actual arrest and victim, let's make up the
fact that she actually threatened him...»
(Although
in my
case I don't think anything was worse than the
actual facts.)
The U.S. EPA
in fact has no list of «endocrine disruptors» at all — preferring to assess chemicals on a
case - by -
case basis; taking into account the entire body of toxicological evidence available; and factoring
in actual human exposure levels.
Social media has done much to bring back that sense of fashion - model ubiquity, but it doesn't change the
fact that the models snapping those Insta stories are the body - type equivalent of the one percent (and,
in the
case of Jenner and the Hadids, who were famous and wealthy before they were models, they're also the
actual one percent).
Thing is, that's okay, because there are so many terrific little touches sprinkled throughout that the
fact the
actual case the heroes are trying to solve is such utter nonsense is
in and of itself just another element helping fuel the fun.
And (2) the famous 70 - percent royalty an author is paid
in this setting by Amazon seems to be figured on the
actual price of the sale (
in this
case, 99 cents) rather than the author's list price ($ 2.99), despite the
fact that the author didn't know about the discount that doesn't seem to have been
in response to any competitive price pressures.
Following some lengthy analysis of the
facts and the previous decisions
in the
case, the district court «concludes that defendants are liable for breaching their fiduciary obligations and are liable beginning on August 16, 2001 — or for three funds the later date institutional share classes become available — for the
actual loss
in excessive fees paid and for the lost investment opportunity of this breach.»
The next stages are easy to predict as well — the issues of «process» will be lost
in the noise, the fake overreaction will dominate the wider conversation and become an alternative
fact to be regurgitated
in twitter threads and blog comments for years, the originators of the issue may or may not walk back the many mis - statements they and others made but will lose credibility
in any
case, mainstream scientists will just see it as hyper - partisan noise and ignore it, no papers will be redacted, no science will change, and the
actual point (one presumes) of the «process» complaint (to encourage better archiving practices) gets set back because it's associated with such obvious nonsense.
I do not pretent to have gone very deeply into the matter, and publish this note merely to draw attention to the
fact that trapped radiation appears to play but a very small part
in the
actual cases with which we are familiar.
(For a discussion of the limits of IPCC, see, Brown, 2008)
In fact observations of
actual greenhouse gas atmospheric concentrations, temperatures, and sea level rise are near or exceeding the IPCC worst -
case predictions.
It is therefore perhaps unsurprising that the experts judged the contrarian statements to be misleading and incompatible with the
actual data, especially
in comparison to the mainstream interpretations of the same data, which would of course state the obvious
fact that most glaciers are shrinking (
in this
case, presented as «rural populations shrinking»).
In this case, your unsupported generalization that «the electorate could not care less» about climate change was rebutted with actual opinion polls showing that significant majorities of «the electorate» do, in fact, care a good deal, and consider the issue a priority for the President and the Congress, and support policies to regulate GHG emissions and to hold fossil fuel corporations responsible for the full costs of their product
In this
case, your unsupported generalization that «the electorate could not care less» about climate change was rebutted with
actual opinion polls showing that significant majorities of «the electorate» do,
in fact, care a good deal, and consider the issue a priority for the President and the Congress, and support policies to regulate GHG emissions and to hold fossil fuel corporations responsible for the full costs of their product
in fact, care a good deal, and consider the issue a priority for the President and the Congress, and support policies to regulate GHG emissions and to hold fossil fuel corporations responsible for the full costs of their products.
However, it is the task of the court to seek to apply
in a rational fashion the principles that have been laid down
in the decided
cases, always bearing
in mind that the
facts in each
case are going to have a significant influence on the
actual outcome of the individual application.
The Judge concluded the
case by pointing out that the dispute demonstrated the range of possible outcomes when parties are calculating Close - Out Amounts, and the wisdom of ISDA making the changes that it did
in the 2002 Agreement — NPC illustrated the type of outcome that a party given the role of decision maker and limited only by a requirement of rationality might press for, regardless of the
fact of an
actual replacement transaction.
Although there was no
actual physical touching
in this
case, the offence to the plaintiff's dignity and autonomy was similar, and the
facts were analogous to sexual assualt.
-- A service provider shall not be liable for monetary relief, or, except as provided
in subsection (j), for injunctive or other equitable relief, for infringement of copyright by reason of the provider referring or linking users to an online location containing infringing material or infringing activity, by using information location tools, including a directory, index, reference, pointer, or hypertext link, if the service provider --(1)(A) does not have
actual knowledge that the material or activity is infringing; (B)
in the absence of such
actual knowledge, is not aware of
facts or circumstances from which infringing activity is apparent; or (C) upon obtaining such knowledge or awareness, acts expeditiously to remove, or disable access to, the material; (2) does not receive a financial benefit directly attributable to the infringing activity,
in a
case in which the service provider has the right and ability to control such activity; and (3) upon notification of claimed infringement as described
in subsection (c)(3), responds expeditiously to remove, or disable access to, the material that is claimed to be infringing or to be the subject of infringing activity, except that, for purposes of this paragraph, the information described
in subsection (c)(3)(A)(iii) shall be identification of the reference or link, to material or activity claimed to be infringing, that is to be removed or access to which is to be disabled, and information reasonably sufficient to permit the service provider to locate that reference or link.
If, however, you were convicted, and the Court found that you knew that the victim hadn't died at the time of trial, but you did not raise the
fact that the victim wasn't dead, it isn't clear if you could have the original conviction vacated because it was a fair trial and you knew evidence sufficient to get yourself acquitted (which you may have refrained from presenting to avoid conviction on a lesser charge like kidnapping or aggravated assault), and the status of an «
actual innocence» grounds for vacating a conviction after trial is hotly disputed, conservatives like the late Justice Scalia generally say «no», liberals generally say «yes», moderates like to say «yes» but make it almost impossible to establish except
in rare
cases like one where a live person walks
in when there was a murder conviction for killing that actually living person.
In fact, Model Civil Jury Charge 2.33, which covers wrongful termination and discrimination
cases, contains a subsection, 2.33 (8), that says that a back pay award «should be reduced by any
actual earnings,» but a plaintiff should not be docked for unemployment benefits or «other unearned income.»
With sophisticated processes
in place to screen for problem secured lending scenarios, it is often the
case that a lender's standard credit risk process, can
in actual fact be the trigger for a purchaser to actually identify the need to consider these issues further.
In fact, both parties may even agree to use top lawyers even if it means a disproportionate budget so far as the
case managing judge is concerned, albeit he might well comment on its apparent unreasonableness for the purposes of the record and any subsequent assessment of
actual costs incurred.
Therefore, the High Court passed undertakings by which traders committed not to «create the false impression that the consumer has already won, will win or will on doing a particular act win, a prize or equivalent benefit, when
in fact taking any action recommended by the [trader]
in relation to claiming the prize or other equivalent benefit is subject to the consumer paying money or incurring a cost which is either: (a) a substantial proportion of the unit cost to the defendant of the provision to the consumer of the thing described as a prize or other equivalent benefit; or (b)
in the
case of a charge stated to be for delivery and insurance, used by the defendant to finance
in whole or
in part its acquisition, handling or other cost of the making available of that thing, other than the
actual cost of its delivery to the consumer and insurance (if any)
in transit» (account rendered by the CJEU
in C - 428 / 11 at para 20, emphasis added).
The
actual opinion relates to evidentiary issues resolved on appeal, but the post highlights a bizarre and startling set of
facts in the
case that are worth repeating.
A products liability
case may bring the
actual defective product into court to show the judge or jury that the product did
in fact break
in the way that witnesses say it did.
Furthermore, based on the
facts of your
case, the estimate of your settlement or recovery produced here could be higher or lower than the
actual amount you may receive
in the process of your settlement or
case.
In particular Flaux J held that while the analysis of cases into categories might be helpful in identifying a strand of authority that was most relevant, there were «any number of cases [that emphasised] that whether or not actual damage has been suffered is, in each case, a fact specific question, an approach which by definition militates against analysis of the cases into... rigid categories»
In particular Flaux J held that while the analysis of
cases into categories might be helpful
in identifying a strand of authority that was most relevant, there were «any number of cases [that emphasised] that whether or not actual damage has been suffered is, in each case, a fact specific question, an approach which by definition militates against analysis of the cases into... rigid categories»
in identifying a strand of authority that was most relevant, there were «any number of
cases [that emphasised] that whether or not
actual damage has been suffered is,
in each case, a fact specific question, an approach which by definition militates against analysis of the cases into... rigid categories»
in each
case, a
fact specific question, an approach which by definition militates against analysis of the
cases into... rigid categories».
The principle difference lies
in the
fact that if your coverage is for replacement value, the insurance company reimburses the replacement cost of your home, whereas
in case your coverage is for cash value, the company will pay only the
actual market value of your home.
In fact, there is no actual obligation that the money must be used to pay off the loans, although in the vast majority of cases this is what happen
In fact, there is no
actual obligation that the money must be used to pay off the loans, although
in the vast majority of cases this is what happen
in the vast majority of
cases this is what happens.
«We do not like the
facts in this recent Koh Tao
case and we do not believe the Thai court has convicted the
actual murderers,» the figure said, speaking
in a digitised voice.