Sentences with phrase «actual facts of the case»

The actual facts of the case were...

The actual application form is only 10 % of the entire package with the remaining 90 % being prepared according to the actual facts of the case.

Coverage depends on the actual facts of each case and the terms, conditions and exclusions of the policy.

Not exact matches

Except if you are worshipping at the Church of Byron Sharp, in which case there has to be a specific and extremely complicated reason why either the Brexit campaigners were in actual fact targeting everyone or this campaign clearly did not work, despite what everyone is starting to suggest.

In that case, either my experience does not have (at any moment) the unity of an actual entity (i.e., it is then in fact and finally many discrete experiences and not an experience at all), or my experience is an actual occasion including, or contributed to by, both the ego and the other occasions of the nexus.

Griffin does not avail himself of the distinction proposed by Pailin, whereby God's personal attributes are those values which God has in fact chosen for all occasions in this actual world, in either case, however, such personal attributes would be knowable in the same way that his metaphysical attributes are, namely, by way of philosophical inquiry.

For if he could speak at all, he might have spoken long before, and the weakness in this case would consist in the fact that he did not possess the maturity of spirit and the concentration to think in advance the whole pain but had thrust something away from him, so that the actual pain contained a plus over and above the thought pain.

The fact that Whitehead understands human experience to consist in discrete «drops» or «actual occasions» of experience may be an example of the fact that Whitehead's generalizations were developed from more than one starting point, in this case modern quantum theory as well as psychology.

In each case there is an actual fact — positive or negative — which must correspond to the assertion; this is significant since the correspondence is a constituent of the proposition qua proposition.

For the perfected actuality passes back into the temporal world, and qualifies this world so that each temporal actuality includes it as an immediate fact of relevant experience» (351) 3 Some interpreters refer also to Whitehead's reference to the «superjective nature» of God in Process and Reality: «The «superjective» nature of God is the character of the pragmatic value of his specific satisfaction qualifying the transcendent creativity in the various temporal instances» (88).4 In this case, however, the actual warrant lies again on page 351, as it is under the light of that particular passage that the «superjective character» on page 88 is interpreted as a reference to the objectification of the consequent nature.

The U.S. EPA in fact has no list of «endocrine disruptors» at all — preferring to assess chemicals on a case - by - case basis; taking into account the entire body of toxicological evidence available; and factoring in actual human exposure levels.

Social media has done much to bring back that sense of fashion - model ubiquity, but it doesn't change the fact that the models snapping those Insta stories are the body - type equivalent of the one percent (and, in the case of Jenner and the Hadids, who were famous and wealthy before they were models, they're also the actual one percent).

Thing is, that's okay, because there are so many terrific little touches sprinkled throughout that the fact the actual case the heroes are trying to solve is such utter nonsense is in and of itself just another element helping fuel the fun.

And (2) the famous 70 - percent royalty an author is paid in this setting by Amazon seems to be figured on the actual price of the sale (in this case, 99 cents) rather than the author's list price ($ 2.99), despite the fact that the author didn't know about the discount that doesn't seem to have been in response to any competitive price pressures.

Following some lengthy analysis of the facts and the previous decisions in the case, the district court «concludes that defendants are liable for breaching their fiduciary obligations and are liable beginning on August 16, 2001 — or for three funds the later date institutional share classes become available — for the actual loss in excessive fees paid and for the lost investment opportunity of this breach.»

You should go to a tax professional with the specific facts of your case, if the actual amounts involved are enough to make it worth it.

The next stages are easy to predict as well — the issues of «process» will be lost in the noise, the fake overreaction will dominate the wider conversation and become an alternative fact to be regurgitated in twitter threads and blog comments for years, the originators of the issue may or may not walk back the many mis - statements they and others made but will lose credibility in any case, mainstream scientists will just see it as hyper - partisan noise and ignore it, no papers will be redacted, no science will change, and the actual point (one presumes) of the «process» complaint (to encourage better archiving practices) gets set back because it's associated with such obvious nonsense.

So premise of such study would be the fact that that government would waving these environmental laws and also be looking a way to streamline governmental approval, so that it's the actual construction time which is the limiting factor and not the court cases, approval process which adding all the time to building nuclear power plants.

Explaining «why» all the thinking and writing is a far different question from explaining the facts of the actual case.

(For a discussion of the limits of IPCC, see, Brown, 2008) In fact observations of actual greenhouse gas atmospheric concentrations, temperatures, and sea level rise are near or exceeding the IPCC worst - case predictions.

It is therefore perhaps unsurprising that the experts judged the contrarian statements to be misleading and incompatible with the actual data, especially in comparison to the mainstream interpretations of the same data, which would of course state the obvious fact that most glaciers are shrinking (in this case, presented as «rural populations shrinking»).

In this case, your unsupported generalization that «the electorate could not care less» about climate change was rebutted with actual opinion polls showing that significant majorities of «the electorate» do, in fact, care a good deal, and consider the issue a priority for the President and the Congress, and support policies to regulate GHG emissions and to hold fossil fuel corporations responsible for the full costs of their products.

Any proper contemplation of one's duty to mitigate must be taken on a consideration of the actual facts applicable to any given case.

This is why FMLA cases require the help of an employment attorney to gather the necessary evidence and prove the actual facts of what happened.

However, it is the task of the court to seek to apply in a rational fashion the principles that have been laid down in the decided cases, always bearing in mind that the facts in each case are going to have a significant influence on the actual outcome of the individual application.

The Judge concluded the case by pointing out that the dispute demonstrated the range of possible outcomes when parties are calculating Close - Out Amounts, and the wisdom of ISDA making the changes that it did in the 2002 Agreement — NPC illustrated the type of outcome that a party given the role of decision maker and limited only by a requirement of rationality might press for, regardless of the fact of an actual replacement transaction.

On its facts, Rigby was a case, like Smith, of an «actual and intended continuation of the relationship of employer and employee without interruption».

The facts of these cases are confidential, as are the clients and actual case names.

-- A service provider shall not be liable for monetary relief, or, except as provided in subsection (j), for injunctive or other equitable relief, for infringement of copyright by reason of the provider referring or linking users to an online location containing infringing material or infringing activity, by using information location tools, including a directory, index, reference, pointer, or hypertext link, if the service provider --(1)(A) does not have actual knowledge that the material or activity is infringing; (B) in the absence of such actual knowledge, is not aware of facts or circumstances from which infringing activity is apparent; or (C) upon obtaining such knowledge or awareness, acts expeditiously to remove, or disable access to, the material; (2) does not receive a financial benefit directly attributable to the infringing activity, in a case in which the service provider has the right and ability to control such activity; and (3) upon notification of claimed infringement as described in subsection (c)(3), responds expeditiously to remove, or disable access to, the material that is claimed to be infringing or to be the subject of infringing activity, except that, for purposes of this paragraph, the information described in subsection (c)(3)(A)(iii) shall be identification of the reference or link, to material or activity claimed to be infringing, that is to be removed or access to which is to be disabled, and information reasonably sufficient to permit the service provider to locate that reference or link.

If, however, you were convicted, and the Court found that you knew that the victim hadn't died at the time of trial, but you did not raise the fact that the victim wasn't dead, it isn't clear if you could have the original conviction vacated because it was a fair trial and you knew evidence sufficient to get yourself acquitted (which you may have refrained from presenting to avoid conviction on a lesser charge like kidnapping or aggravated assault), and the status of an «actual innocence» grounds for vacating a conviction after trial is hotly disputed, conservatives like the late Justice Scalia generally say «no», liberals generally say «yes», moderates like to say «yes» but make it almost impossible to establish except in rare cases like one where a live person walks in when there was a murder conviction for killing that actually living person.

D - Link denies these allegations and on Jan. 31 moved to dismiss the case on a variety of grounds, including the fact that there is no evidence of actual or likely consumer injury, and that liability can not be based on «unspecified and hypothetical» risk of future harm.

The Lloyds report rather pooh - poohs this fact by suggesting that the actual number of cases that reach court is just the tip of an expanding iceberg.

In fact, both parties may even agree to use top lawyers even if it means a disproportionate budget so far as the case managing judge is concerned, albeit he might well comment on its apparent unreasonableness for the purposes of the record and any subsequent assessment of actual costs incurred.

Therefore, the High Court passed undertakings by which traders committed not to «create the false impression that the consumer has already won, will win or will on doing a particular act win, a prize or equivalent benefit, when in fact taking any action recommended by the [trader] in relation to claiming the prize or other equivalent benefit is subject to the consumer paying money or incurring a cost which is either: (a) a substantial proportion of the unit cost to the defendant of the provision to the consumer of the thing described as a prize or other equivalent benefit; or (b) in the case of a charge stated to be for delivery and insurance, used by the defendant to finance in whole or in part its acquisition, handling or other cost of the making available of that thing, other than the actual cost of its delivery to the consumer and insurance (if any) in transit» (account rendered by the CJEU in C - 428 / 11 at para 20, emphasis added).

The actual opinion relates to evidentiary issues resolved on appeal, but the post highlights a bizarre and startling set of facts in the case that are worth repeating.

Furthermore, based on the facts of your case, the estimate of your settlement or recovery produced here could be higher or lower than the actual amount you may receive in the process of your settlement or case.

I use the fact that I personally handle all aspects of their case as a selling point, which is very beneficial to clients who have come from bigger law firms where they rarely ever spoke to the actual attorney on their case.

«24.1 I accept that on the facts of this case there was no actual interference with justice because the bank was at pains to prevent any loss to the prosecutor or to the Crown from anything that was done.

In particular Flaux J held that while the analysis of cases into categories might be helpful in identifying a strand of authority that was most relevant, there were «any number of cases [that emphasised] that whether or not actual damage has been suffered is, in each case, a fact specific question, an approach which by definition militates against analysis of the cases into... rigid categories».

The judge made it clear that, while the question of when actual damage is suffered is fact specific to each case, where a solicitor owes a duty to bring about a transaction with particular characteristics, if upon completion the transaction is fl awed because those characteristics are absent, the client suffers actual damage on the date of the transaction.

The principle difference lies in the fact that if your coverage is for replacement value, the insurance company reimburses the replacement cost of your home, whereas in case your coverage is for cash value, the company will pay only the actual market value of your home.

In fact, there is no actual obligation that the money must be used to pay off the loans, although in the vast majority of cases this is what happens.