But while this aspect of the eye structure can be associated with deterministic development, and
the actual growth is seen to be so, the light sensitive pigments that the units manifest are more complicated.
Not exact matches
Our
growth has
been stagnating a bit, and the last 2 months we've
seen an
actual decrease compared to the month before.
Now, this
was compared to so - called historical controls, meaning compared to the kind of cancer
growth one typically
sees in their situation — not to an
actual, randomized, control group.
This year, most major publishers
are not
seeing growth and
actual declines year on year.
And they have resisted subscription services that have
seen actual growth (Kindle Unlimited) while dabbling in services that
were operating like Ponzi schemes.
Forget the printed dollars and focus on the rapid creation of credit by the Fed — not
actual paper dollars for the metaphorical helicopter drop, but
actual credit — and we discover an even uglier truth: The Adjusted Monetary Base (
See St. Louis Fed chart below)
is collapsing EVEN AS MZM GROWTH IS MOVING TO NEW HIGH
is collapsing EVEN AS MZM
GROWTH IS MOVING TO NEW HIGH
IS MOVING TO NEW HIGHS.
However, if you do believe in Applegreen's
growth story, any reversal in fuel margin
is unlikely to mean a reduction in
actual fuel gross profit (model higher revenue numbers & you'll
see that), though obviously it would affect its earnings
growth trajectory.
The goal
is to develop the innate ability to
see a penny stock promotion for what it
is and when to know a company has
actual growth potential.
As can
be seen in the graphs below, the projected
growth lines quite accurately follow the
actual developments.
Based on past revisions alone, we estimate that even though +0.5 %
is the most likely value for Chinese CO2 emissions
growth in 2016 relative to 2015, the
actual value could
be anywhere from 3 % up to 2.5 % down (
see chart above).
2 - Scientists post explanation, [uea.ac.uk] showing the deniers» allegations to
be baseless (The «hidden» decline in tree ring
growth was published a decade ago -
see Nature link above; in this very publication, it
was shown to diverge from the
actual instrumental record after 1960; so for the post-1960 period we basically replace tree rings with the
actual instrumental data, because we trust thermometers more than tree rings when the two fail to agree; we cited the relevant articles in the caption for the graph just to
be sure).
The author of this article needs to at the very least provide a graph showing a comparison between
actual growth in energy usage since 1980 and the scenarios that Hansen provided, so we can
see which line on the graph we
're supposed to
be comparing observed temperature with.
Is not correct, for if you do a graph of the
actual growth rates of CO2 over a longer time period, the
actual nonlinear, exponential
growth can clearly
be seen in this graph:
Despite attaining «tweet» levels between 1:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. generally only
seen for the hottest Supreme Court of Canada decisions,
actual page views of the decision
were several orders of magnitudes higher than
growth in referrals from twitter would suggest.