Sentences with phrase «actual human co2»

Not exact matches

, the actual worst case of human CO2 emission growth due to the pipeline is miniscule.

HERE is a line of empirical evidence: (human / industry CO2 emissions are causing global warming) * Climate Myth The Skeptic - Denier position: There's no empirical evidence «There is no actual evidence that carbon dioxide emissions are causing global warming.

Of course, if the NYTimes or WAPO or CNN or CBS or the AP were ever to report the actual cooling trend over the last 15 years (despite the massive amounts of human CO2 emissions) this would establish that they have been grossly misleading the public for years about consensus «global warming.»

I have looked at the actual past development of atmospheric CO2 and compared that with the actual development of both human population and GDP.

In actual fact, the rate of human CO2 emissions (the principal GHG) increased to 1.9 % per year (based on CDIAC data).

The alarmist hypothesis that human CO2 emissions are similar to a furnace's «thermostat» or a «control - knob» has proven also to be a pseudo-science claim, which actual scientists now consider an embarrassment best forgotten.

If he is to maintain the moronic green / left dogma that only human CO2 causes global warming and climate change, his only course is to denounce the actual CERN climate experiments as more Republican anti-science.

As climate alarmists rend their garments over fossil fuel emissions, a group of scientists has discovered that the world's plants have somehow increased their capacity to assimilate carbon, resulting in an actual decline in the percentage of human - produced CO2 remaining in the atmosphere.

The IPCC and AGW hypothesis supporters like to talk about net CO2 because it looks scary, but compared to the actual flux of CO2 and the associated uncertainty the human contribution is actually pretty small.

Whether its the old NASA computer model simulations or the newer variety of IPCC climate models, Hansen's 1988 prediction of rapidly accelerating and dangerous global warming from human CO2, and other greenhouse gases, has done poorly in comparison to actual observed temps.

Trenberth has no actual physical evidence proving any more than a 5 % contribution from humans to the 2.037 ppmv / year average increase in atmospheric CO2 over the past 10 years.

Since human emissions can be calculated in actual tonnage, simple algebra can show the relative contributions of CO2 to the atmospheric concentration from human and other sources.

CptWayne, given that accumulated human emissions are approximately double the actual rise in atmospheric CO2, as you yourself state, why should it be hard to understand that pretty much all of the atmospheric rise is attributable to human emissions from fossil fuel burning?