Sentences with phrase «actual meaning of this phrase»

but many readers unfamiliar with the actual meaning of this phrase might think that some clarity was needed in important sections rather than the real truth that the paper is a shambles.

Not exact matches

For purposes of illustration, let us have a simple example: A and B are actual entities, and B prehends A. And so there is the nexus — call it the A-B nexus — that is constituted by B's prehension of A. 6 The phrase «prehensions of each other» in the category suggests that, in order to have a nexus, A must also prehend B. However, I think that Whitehead used that phrase loosely, and so its meaning can also be expressed as «prehensions of one another.»

As I read Hartshorne, he maintains that «God is not spatially localized» (Schilpp, 545) and the meaning of this phrase is that God is everywhere — «God is not spatially separated from things» he has written (Schilpp, 545), and in a recent book he claims that deity, the universally immanent, is everywhere.5 Given this assumption Hartshorne is then able to say that since God, being everywhere, includes the regional standpoint of every temporal actual entity, he must intuit all occasions wherever they are as they occur» (Schilpp, 545).

In Pastor Benke's actual prayer (as opposed to the written text from which he departed), he made no mention of Jesus (except in the closing phrase), nor of the significance of Christ's life, death, and resurrection as the unique expression of God's love, nor of the need for repentance and faith in Christ as means of grace.

[2] The phrase's actual meaning implies the increasing likelihood of suppressed feelings for the contrary of that which is being argued.

Shall we then conclude that philosophers such as Descartes who thought that there are actual beings (material objects) that do not have such power, were simply confused on a point of semantics — mistaken about the meaning of the phrase «actual being?»

As for the actual term, «clean label,» however, only 58 % of the respondents (who defined themselves as ingredient conscious) were familiar with the phrase, and of those, more than a third said they did not know what the term meant.

For the spoken phrases in both games, was there an attempt for a similar kind of consistency in constructing an actual language, or were those spoken phrases left to be more open and flexible in their meaning and context?

Indiana saw the word «Love» often in his religious upbringing in such phrases as «God is Love,» Indiana explains that «LOVE is purely a skeleton of all that word has meant in all the erotic and religious aspects of the theme, and to bring it down to the actual structure of calligraphy [is to reduce it] to the bare bone.»

It's immediately understandable — even if you don't know exactly what a garbage person is, you have a pretty good idea of what a garbage person is — it's so absurd that it can be mean or funny depending on how you need to utilize it, and it has its roots in both 16th - century figurative use of the word «garbage» and Charles Manson using the actual phrase «garbage people,» so you can sound completely sophisticated every time you type it.