Sentences with phrase «actual measurement data»

Use of a uniform prior distribution with an infinite range is a device in Bayesian statistics intended to reflect a lack of knowledge, prior to information from actual measurement data, and any other information, being incorporated.

Unfortunately there were no vertical measurements taken in November 2011, the time we chose to model, so we plan in the future to do simulations for time periods for which actual measurement data exist.»

Not exact matches

Important questions yet to be resolved include the details of obtaining and confirming a target warhead during the zero - knowledge measurement; specifics of establishing and maintaining the pre-loaded detectors in a way that ensures inspecting party confidence without revealing any data considered sensitive by the inspected party; and feasibility questions associated with safely deploying active interrogation measurement techniques on actual nuclear warheads in sensitive physical environments, in a way that provides confidence to both the inspected and inspecting parties.

Estimating the errors inherent in the kind of measurements used by Maciejewski and his co-authors is a tough thing to do, Bean says; if the actual errors in the data were larger than the researchers had accounted for, the variations in the observed transit times could vanish.

The BMFL team covers the complete track from involvement in experimental design, study set - up and sample collection to the actual measurements, data analysis, identification of unknown compounds and comprehensive feedback on the results.

The paper excited experts, but they warned that the use of satellite data to estimate pH levels will never supplant the need for actual measurements.

The study brought together data from several spacecraft, as well as supporting observations from solar wind probes and ground - based geomagnetic observatories, to develop a model that describes the Earth's magnetic field and its interaction with the solar wind not just theoretically as had been the case previously, but based on actual measurements.

These have advantages in cost, but do not provide actual numbers that you can use to calculate a ratio, so if you're into the solid data like me, blood measurements are necessary.

The data has been gathered from such sources as blogs, online newspaper and magazine articles, company financial statements, company advertising information packages (including media packages), the actual dating service website (or their parent company website), and multiple website measurement services.

By contrast, weather forecasting that leverages «data science» collects a vast amount of historical information on air, temperature, and humidity, and assesses the relationship between those measurements and actual past events, such as whether or not a storm occurred.

Neuroskeptic — There are little to no actual data (i.e., temperature measurements) from most of the Artic.

If you're talking about global mean temperature I would advise you to compare the projections of the IPCC to the actual measurements of GISS as well as HadCRUT, RSS MSU, and UAH MSU measured data.

I would really be interested in seing actual arctic ground UVB measurements made during the last and next months... maybe Markus knows of a link to these data?

Professor Peter Wadhams, member of AMEG, expert on Arctic sea ice and a reviewer for the IPCC AR5 report, says that the PIOMAS data is based on actual thickness measurements.

[1] Reconstructing solar activity variability beyond the time scale of actual measurements provides invaluable data for modeling of past and future climate change.

Some measurements to date are showing it is negative (unless one does it using the new climate math where the signs of your actual data are just switched around the other way).

Using data without a safety margin, such as mean values for a given turbine model, measurements from a single turbine, or «best guess» for future turbines gives in principle a probability of 50 per cent that the actual erected turbines will emit more noise than assumed and that noise limits will be exceeded.»

While it is true that these data were derived from temperature measurements in boreholes, the database does not include the actual temperature vs. depth measurements.

I've been following the Argo data since these buoys started returning actual measurements

I think you can also see the fundamental problem with taking that smoothed data set and just throwing it in with actual temperature measurements with all of their year - to - year and decade - to - decade variations.

So please give an example where measurements of any given phenomenon were taken, with a potential error range of the equivalent of + / - 5 % that you stipulated in the initial measurements, where that poor initial data was processed using statistics, and provided an «actual average measurement within + / -.03 %, that was then verified against later, with subsequent more accurate measurements.

The Bureau have consistently said I am raising a non-issue: that there is no difference between the measurements from mercury thermometers and their electronic probes... while never providing any actual reports or data to back - up this claim.

This means that the trend indicated by the Colorado data is calibrated not to actual measurements, but co2 theory.

Empirical Data (actual measurements) doesn't fit theory predicted or models.

We have a lot of other issues — measurement biases, problems with historical reconstructions, role of the sun, etc — but this chart highlights the central problem — that catastrophic warming forecasts make no sense based on the last 100 + years of actual data.

It can only be settled by actual measurements, data.

Snow depth over sea ice data You might be surprised to find out how few data on snow depth over sea ice exists (i.e., actual observations or measurements), apart from measurements that ringed seal researchers have collected.

Atmospheric CO2 has risen from an estimated pre-industrial level of 280 ppmv (based on ice core data) to 390 ppmv today, based on actual Mauna Loa measurement.

The crowd of government - financed alarmists artificially introduced this signal by excluding Canadian, Siberian, high - altitude and other «inconvenient» measurements from data sets, by various «adjustments» fitting the desired outcome, by placing meteorological stations on airport tarmacs, at air conditioners» exhausts and in other artificially heated places, and by blatantly omitting, negating, and even reversing (as in prof. Mann's case) actual results.

If the actual temperature as represented by mesurement A is just as likely to be too high as too low then the data is unbiased and we can average it with other measurements and, given enough such measurements we can even come up with averages of greater accuracy than the individual measurements (though that's tricky and requires further examination of what sort of unbiasness we're dealing with.)

These surface networks have had so many changes over time that the number of stations that have been moved, had their time of observation changed, had equipment changes, maintenance issues, or have been encroached upon by micro site biases and / or UHI using the raw data for all stations on a national scale or even a global scale gives you a result that is no longer representative of the actual measurements, there is simply too much polluted data.

Measurement sites form the core input of the data set for calculating this «global mean temperature» (whatever that actually means), but the measurements from these sites is accurate at best to the nearest 1 degree, in actual practice around the nearest 5 degrees since many are reading off mercury thermometers — and this condition increases in frequency the further back in time you go.

The raw data represents the actual measurements; anything else that has been adjusted is not fully representative of the measurement reality no matter how well - intentioned, accurate, or detailed those adjustments are.

Use that correction on the data of the old equipment at the other 50 sites, and then compare it to the actual measurements there of the new equipment.

(And I don't mean statistical comparisons to model generated data, I mean comparisons to actual temp measurements.)

This study was released in 2010, and they used actual measurements, rather than proxy data and reconstructions like Mann did.

So does the NCEP process of using an operational weather forecasting model to integrate the actual measurements into a meteorologically coherent set of data presented on a regular grid.

I presume that their empirical data (ie., the BB calculations performed by NASA and the actual temperature measurements performed by NASA) are correct.

At the following two links, they describe in some detail the data they have, where the measurements are being taken (via satellites, ground - based, or planes, etc.), although they want you to pay to get the actual data.

When you plot observational sea ice data to satellite measurements of albedo you should be able to verify the actual impact, thus your arguments in regard to albedo changes (or cloud cover) in time and space might be interesting but doesn't change the general assumptions, the observations.

It is all actual measurements of real data from the real world.

Actual, hard number measurements, and you have to have enough data about your system to give you some actual information (never conflate data and information, they are not the same tActual, hard number measurements, and you have to have enough data about your system to give you some actual information (never conflate data and information, they are not the same tactual information (never conflate data and information, they are not the same thing).

This is a unique set of data and possibly the first evaluation of the NHS Health Check diabetes filter in a clinical practice setting whereby the actual risk for diabetes had been obtained directly from measurement of HbA1c.