Interesting as the tales may be, we should always bear in mind that nothing should ever be accepted as «truth» without
actual objective evidence.
Not exact matches
As for our
actual investment position, that's always driven by the
objective evidence, and on that basis we are defensive.
No one yet has ever produced
actual (physical,
objective, independent, verifiable, factual)
evidence for any alleged (but never proven) god.
The
objective unity of the world, even though the experience of it may be difficult to reconstruct, is not of a character more lacking in
evidence than the concretion of the world in
actual, perishing occasions.
The IPCC climate models are programmed to predict the opposite of what
objective scientists believe due to the above
actual evidence, and what crazy billionaires know (and will invest) due to common sense.
A fascinating exercise for any
objective reporter to undertake would be to ask the student to cite
actual physical
evidence (full context document scans, undercover video / audio transcripts, leaked emails, money - transfer receipts, etc.) proving skeptic scientists were paid to fabricate demonstratively false science papers, reports, assessments or viewpoints — material that could stand up in a courtroom evidentiary hearing proving a pay - for - performance arrangement exists.