If you get
an actual order from the court, you can not legally opt out; but their attorney can not compel you to to provide any information.
Not exact matches
To the extent permitted by law, we shall not be liable for any Losses by or with respect to the Account, except to the extent that such Losses are
actual Losses proven with reasonable certainty, are not speculative, are proven to have been fairly within the contemplation of the parties as of the date hereof, and are determined by a
court of competent jurisdiction or an arbitration panel in a final non-appealable judgment or
order to have resulted solely
from our gross negligence or willful misconduct and without limiting the generality of the foregoing, we will not be liable for any indirect, special, incidental or consequential damages or other losses (regardless of whether such damages or other losses were reasonably foreseeable).
Koch Media may also disclose personal data to law enforcement, or the appropriate civil authorities to enforce legal rights and comply with the law, or to comply with an
order from a government entity or other competent authority, or when we have reason to believe that a disclosure is necessary to address potential or
actual injury or interference with our rights, property, reputation, operations, users or others who may be harmed or may suffer loss or damage, or when we believe that disclosure is necessary to protect our rights, fraud protection and / or comply with a judicial proceeding,
court order, or legal process served on Koch Media.
Those issues are dealt with separately
from the
actual divorce either by way of a separation agreement, an arbitration award or a
court order.
102, 527 S.E. 2d 898 [3](2000), which states: [l] n
order for statements in medical records to be utilized as a prior inconsistent statement against a witness when the medical provider who recorded the witness» statements in the medical record is not present at trial, the trial
court must be able to reasonably infer
from the face of the records that the witness was the
actual source of the statements at issue if the witness denies having made the statement.
Despite attaining «tweet» levels between 1:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. generally only seen for the hottest Supreme
Court of Canada decisions,
actual page views of the decision were several
orders of magnitudes higher than growth in referrals
from twitter would suggest.