In addition to factors previously disclosed in Tesla's and SolarCity's reports filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the «SEC») and those identified elsewhere in this document, the following factors, among others, could cause
actual results to differ materially from forward - looking statements and historical performance: the ability to obtain regulatory approvals and
meet other closing conditions to the transaction, including requisite approval by Tesla and SolarCity stockholders, on a timely basis or at all; delay in closing the transaction; the ultimate
outcome and results
of integrating the operations
of Tesla and SolarCity and the ultimate ability to realize synergies and other benefits; business disruption following the transaction; the availability and access, in general,
of funds to
meet debt obligations and to fund ongoing operations and necessary capital expenditures; and the ability to comply with all covenants in the indentures and credit facilities
of Tesla and SolarCity, any violation
of which, if not cured in a timely manner, could trigger a default
of other obligations under cross-default provisions.
In a nutshell, she points out that the
MET study asked whether
actual observation
of teaching, student surveys, or VAM test score measures did a better job
of predicting future student test score growth, which «privileges» test scores by using it both as a variable being tested and as the
outcome reflecting gains.
The Equality Impact Statements analyze provincial legislation using gender as a focal point to compare the intentions
of law - makers to
meet standards
of fairness and equality with the
actual outcomes of legislative and policy choice; the ultimate goal was to ensure that provincial legislation was having a positive impact on British Columbians.