Your actually quite arrogant amateur opinion versus the professional opinions of thousands upon thousands of
actual practicing scientists for centuries now since the Enlightenment.
Not exact matches
The next stages are easy to predict as well — the issues of «process» will be lost in the noise, the fake overreaction will dominate the wider conversation and become an alternative fact to be regurgitated in twitter threads and blog comments for years, the originators of the issue may or may not walk back the many mis - statements they and others made but will lose credibility in any case, mainstream
scientists will just see it as hyper - partisan noise and ignore it, no papers will be redacted, no science will change, and the
actual point (one presumes) of the «process» complaint (to encourage better archiving
practices) gets set back because it's associated with such obvious nonsense.
His comments here and elsewhere over time make clear that his skepticism is informed not by his command of the evidence and of the scientific method as it is
practiced by
actual scientists, but by his disdain for «orthodoxy» and his resentment at being told he doesn't know what he's talking about.
Because this statement was made in the context of doing
actual climate science, you are referring to a fairly large group of
scientists and suggests to me that you must be aware of a sizable subgroup of
practicing climate
scientists that elicit this behavior.
While
scientists have long understood the carbon storing potential of tropical peatland forests — they lock up to five times more carbon than tropical forests and account for a third of the world's total carbon reserves — much less is known about the
actual amounts of carbon stored in their soils and the impacts of unsustainable land - use
practices.
«The advent of AI means that technology teams will effectively become another pillar of legal service delivery in the
practice, and computer
scientists will find themselves working alongside lawyers and partners on
actual transactions and disputes.